著者
江原 由美子
出版者
日本マス・コミュニケーション学会
雑誌
新聞学評論 (ISSN:04886550)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.37, pp.51-65,322-321, 1988

The audience "interprets" messages from mass media. Would this fact be inconsistent with an emphasis on the strong impact of mass media ? Phenomenological sociology and ethnomethodology been analyzing conversations in "every day", face-to-face interactions. This article is an attempt to apply this face-to-face, interactive communication model to the analysis of communication between mass meida and the audience. The audience does not "passively" receive the massage from mass media as expressed, but "actively" makes out the meaning by interpreting it. In these interpretative-practices, however, the audience is strongly influenced by mass media. In this article, we take up the complaint of the women's movement against a TV commercial as an example. Hearing a news report on the complaint against the commercial, some of the audience took exception to the act of complaning and expressed various opinions about it. These opinions reval the audience's interpretative-practices clearly. The audience imaginatively categorized the complanants according to certain personality types and expessed a sense that the complaint was not relevant to the audience. Acoording to this analysis, we can build up a model for the interpretative -practice on TV commercials of the audience. The audience, (1) interprets cemmercial messages in terms of the primary interest in an advertisement for the goods. (2) distinguishs "serious" messages from "joking" ones, and restrains the interpretation which confuses the difference between them. (3) makes up for "tacit" messages, which are not directly expressed in the commercial messages, by interpreting them. As analyzed above, it is obvious that the audience is actively engaged in interpretative-practices of making sense out of both TV commercials and news reports. The interpretative-practice, however, should not deny the great influence of mass media. The audience is under the strong influence of the "tacit messages" of mass media in terms of interpretative-practices.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (8 users, 10 posts, 9 favorites)

堀先生が「僕食べる人、私作る人」のCMへの批判を挙げているけれど、このCMへの批判に対する再批判でもっとも多かったのは、「この告発は本質をはずれている」というもの。 実は今回と同じ構図といえて、今回はその数が可視化されたことが大きな違い。 https://t.co/EAzVuGIKVd
コンテンツに対する批判は、受け手の解釈を批判することになる。だから、一般的な価値観とは異なる観点からの批判は、その告発は不当だと多くの反感を買う。 このことは、フェミニストとしても有名な江原由美子から1988年の時点で指摘されていて興味深い。 https://t.co/EAzVuGIKVd
広告に対する批判と言えば1975年の「私作る人、僕食べる人」のCMが有名だけど、この批判に対する再批判として一般的だったのは、「この告発は本質をはずれている」というものだったのは興味深い。 https://t.co/EAzVuGIKVd
江原由美子「「受け手」の解釈作業とマス・メディアの影響力 (<特集>新しい「受け手」論の研究)」は、ハウス食品工業の「私作る人、僕食べる人」を巡る批判と再批判について論じているが、「お母さん食堂」にもかなり当てはまると思う。 https://t.co/TV1jity3Fi

収集済み URL リスト