著者

鈴木 泰平

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.33, no.3, pp.293-363, 1961-04

---

史學科開設五十周年記念序論 史料解説およびデムーラン略傅本論 (一) 「ヴュウ・コルドリエ」研究 (一) 「ヴュウ・コルドリエ」發行の背景 (二) 「ヴュウ・コルドリエ」一號,二號 (三) 「ヴュウ・コルドリエ」三號,四號 (四) 「ヴュウ・コルドリエ」五號,六號 (五) 「ヴュウ・コルドリエ」の史料的價値と問題提起 (二) ダントン,エベール兩派の研究 (一) アルフォンス・オーラールの所論 (二) アルベェール・マティエの所論 (三) ジョルジュ・ルフェーブルの所論 (四) 史學史的研究に於る問題の所在 (三) ブーショット大佐の研究 (一) ブーショットに於る問題提起およびエベール派とダントン派 (二) ブーショットとエベール派(一) (三) ブーショットとエベール派(二)結論 陸軍長官ブーショットあとがき 補註"Vieux Cordelier", the paper published by Camille Desmoulins, tell's us not only about political assertion of Dauton's party, but aboutcomplicated matters of Revolutionary France from the end of 1793 to early 1794. Colonel Bouchotte, the name of which is put as the title was one of the characters through those matters. He was attacked violently by Danton's party through Desmoulins's paper. Colonel Boucotte was nothing but the director of Military Committee belonged to Temporary Administration Committee, an excutive body of Revolutinary Government of Robespierrian party, but the matter in why he came to be attacked. About details of this attack, we found little accounts in materials so the problem why he was attacked was left unsolved. But after exermining the Collection of Historical Materials of Comite du salut public" by Bouchez et Roux and Aulard, we found the facts that Hebert's party, as well as well as Danton's, moved serching for some profit to the Government and especially, the conflict between the two about military supply, was severe and then resulted in Desmonlins's attack against Bouchotte.