著者
木村 敦
出版者
大阪産業大学
雑誌
大阪産業大学経済論集 (ISSN:13451448)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.11, no.3, pp.307-327, 2010-06

The aim of this study is to express an opinion about "What is the essence of social welfare", and to clarify "social welfare as a subject of investigation", based on that opinion. Recently, the state of social welfare policy has changed greatly, and the term for a person who receives social welfare benefits has changed from "recipient" to "subject" and then to "user". However, the change in name has not improved the recipients' life circumstances. In short, recent social welfare policy has not contributed to "a better life" for people. In this situation, I think that "social welfare policy theory as social science" is necessary in order to contribute to "a better life" for people, i.e., in order to amend current social welfare policy. The aim of this study was decided based on the reasons above. To achieve this aim of clarification of social welfare as a subject, social welfare provisions from the standpoint of the economic theories of Kazuo Okochi and Shoichi Kohashi are first explained. Then, relying fundamentally on Kohashi's theory, arguments regarding these provisions from the standpoint of sociological / functional / movement theory are explained by way of critique. In conclusion, problems are explained which arise when Kohashi's theory is applied to the practice of social work.

言及状況

Twitter (10 users, 11 posts, 17 favorites)

@kn_socio_ftfc ご存知かもしれませんが、木村論文のpp.16-18で孝橋から運動論への反論を整理する中で、副田論文と同じく1972年の孝橋の著作をもとに福祉労働への見解を紹介しています。 CiNii 論文 -  社会福祉はなぜ社会政策を「補充・代替」するのか--孝橋正一の所論を手がかりに https://t.co/Hu4zS5qzST #CiNii
【脱貧困から非貧困へ】生活保護闘争である朝日訴訟が「生活保護基準」を引き上げたという「運動が社会福祉を拡充させたこと」より重要なのは…。孝橋は、運動の進展が社会政策の発展を招来し、そのことによって社会福祉が代替させられる領域が縮小することが評価すべきと。 https://t.co/bIBQArcp4E

収集済み URL リスト