- 著者
- 三島 江津子 岡戸 洋 加藤 さおり 櫛原 秀之 黒田 純子 榊原 隆志 首代 みどり 鈴木 厚志 松岡 加恵 宮坂 朋恵 渡辺 法男 横田 学 板倉 由縁 鈴木 照美 斉藤 寛子
- 出版者
- 一般社団法人日本医療薬学会
- 雑誌
- 医療薬学 = Japanese journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences (ISSN:1346342X)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.35, no.6, pp.403-408, 2009-06-10
- 参考文献数
- 11
- 被引用文献数
- 1
When pharmacists provide drug guidance to in-patients,they are often asked about health foods such patients are regularly taking in expectation of anti-cancer effects.However,pharmacists cannot always answer these questions based on scientific evidence.<br>To further evaluate the efficacy of health foods for this purpose,we did a survey of the literature concerning 5 frequently used health foods said to have anticancer effects using the PubMed and Ichushi search services,obtaining 1,300 papers from the former and 1,142 papers from the latter.However among them,we could not find any providing data from randomized controlled trials and thus there was no clear scientific evidence,though some of the papers noted an improvement in the quality of life of patients.<br>In conclusion,when pharmacists provide guidance on health foods to patients and their families,it is important for them to collect detailed information and evaluate them on a scientific basis.
- 著者
- 三島 江津子 岡戸 洋 加藤 さおり 櫛原 秀之 黒田 純子 榊原 隆志 首代 みどり 鈴木 厚志 松岡 加恵 宮坂 朋恵 渡辺 法男 横田 学 板倉 由縁 鈴木 照美 斉藤 寛子
- 出版者
- 一般社団法人日本医療薬学会
- 雑誌
- 医療薬学 (ISSN:1346342X)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.35, no.6, pp.403-408, 2009 (Released:2010-08-19)
- 参考文献数
- 11
- 被引用文献数
- 1 1
When pharmacists provide drug guidance to in-patients,they are often asked about health foods such patients are regularly taking in expectation of anti-cancer effects.However,pharmacists cannot always answer these questions based on scientific evidence.To further evaluate the efficacy of health foods for this purpose,we did a survey of the literature concerning 5 frequently used health foods said to have anticancer effects using the PubMed and Ichushi search services,obtaining 1,300 papers from the former and 1,142 papers from the latter.However among them,we could not find any providing data from randomized controlled trials and thus there was no clear scientific evidence,though some of the papers noted an improvement in the quality of life of patients.In conclusion,when pharmacists provide guidance on health foods to patients and their families,it is important for them to collect detailed information and evaluate them on a scientific basis.
- 著者
- 佐々木 俊則 大島 有美子 三島 江津子 伴 晶子 桂川 健司 永松 秀紹 吉岡 祐貴 築山 郁人 久田 達也 板倉 由縁 水谷 三浩
- 出版者
- 公益社団法人 日本薬学会
- 雑誌
- YAKUGAKU ZASSHI (ISSN:00316903)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.136, no.7, pp.1023-1029, 2016 (Released:2016-07-01)
- 参考文献数
- 15
It is often necessary to modify the dose or schedule of eribulin mesilate (Eri) because of adverse events. Therefore, we retrospectively investigated the optimal approach for Eri dose adjustment and/or dosage interval adjustment. Patients who received Eri at the institutions affiliated with the Division of Oncology of the Aichi Prefectural Society of Hospital Pharmacists between July 2011 and November 2013 were enrolled in this study. We compared the group that underwent dose reduction without changes to their dosage interval (dose reduction group) with the group that had a change in their dosage interval (dose-interval prolongation group). The primary end-point was time to treatment failure (TTF), and the secondary end-points were overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and adverse events. The TTF and OS of the dose reduction group were approximately two times longer than those of the dose-interval prolongation group. In addition, the dose reduction group had significantly improved ORR and CBR, which together indicate an antitumor effect (p=0.013 and 0.002, respectively). Although peripheral neuropathy occurred significantly more frequently in the patients in the dose reduction group (p=0.026), it was grade 1 and controllable in most of the cases. There were no differences in the occurrence of other adverse effects between the two groups. Therefore, we suggest that dose reduction with maintenance of the dosage interval is the preferred treatment approach in cases where Eri dose or schedule modification is necessary.