- 著者
-
上野 太祐
- 出版者
- 日本倫理学会
- 雑誌
- 倫理学年報 (ISSN:24344699)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.69, pp.249-262, 2020 (Released:2021-05-24)
This paper explains how Yamamoto Jōchō interpreted the teaching “I have
found the way of the warrior in death” for himself. This teaching is generally
interpreted as helping warriors find the determination to die. However, it entailed
for Jōchō a self-contradictory situation. Despite his insistence that warriors
had to die, Jōchō was, of course, still alive when he pronounced the teaching.
In such a situation─espousing a teaching on death yet surviving his master─he arrived at a profound insight into life’s meaning after deep contemplation.
Approaching this teaching from this perspective allows for a meaningful reinterpretation
of this purportedly “radical”, and “dangerous” teaching.
Jōchō could not commit suicide upon his master’s death because his master
had forbidden it. He therefore decided upon world-renunciation instead. After
his symbolic death through world-renunciation, he anguished over having to
continue living without his master. His teaching must therefore be interpreted
in this light: Jōchō was suffering through survival.
In retrospect, there were two remarkable events in his life. One was the experience
of acquiring meaning for his life through a command: his master requested
that Jōchō served at his side. Jōchō looked upon himself as a “worthless” retainer
but decided to devote his life to his master. The other event was a
miracle. Jōchō had a sudden premonition and reached his master to be with him
at his death. This demonstrated for Jōchō, his unity, body and soul, with his
master. Jōchō realized that he had already become an authentic “Nabeshima retainer”
by becoming an authentic retainer to his master. These moments generated
an existential conflict between committing suicide and surviving because of
his master’s prohibition. Seen from the perspective of this existential problem,
Jōchō’s teaching should be understood as a confession of his anguished self-suffering
based on this ambivalence rather than a radical enjoinment of the warrior
to embrace death.