著者

宮越 直樹

出版者

一般社団法人日本品質管理学会

雑誌

品質 (ISSN:03868230)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.46, no.1, pp.7-13, 2016-01-15

---

In Japan, the lessons learned from Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear accident have been reflecting and implementing to the nuclear facilities in order to re-start their operations. However, when we review the Fukushima nuclear accident from the viewpoint of the quality assurance, it is regrettable that this nuclear quality assurance could not contribute to prevent from Fukushima nuclear accident. The nuclear quality assurance up to now was mainly focused to the quality of the products and maintaining and operating activities of the nuclear facilities. Essentially, the quality assurance is a scientific approach to achieve the objectives and consists of identifying quality problems, providing their solutions and corrective actions to prevent from recurrence. It should be also effective to achieve nuclear safety. Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear accident taught us that nuclear safety is achieved by the efforts of all participants of the nuclear business. Nuclear safety starts from siting and terminates decommissioning including emergency preparedness. It is important to reconsider wide-ranging and more in-depth management systems to contribute safety. It should be a kind of social system involving all participants.

著者

鳥飼 誠之 小澤 通裕 鐘ヶ江 直道 谷 雅明 班目 春樹 宮越 直樹

出版者

一般社団法人 日本原子力学会

雑誌

日本原子力学会和文論文誌 (ISSN:13472879)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.9, no.4, pp.347-359, 2010 (Released:2012-02-08)

参考文献数

12

被引用文献数

1 2

---

On March 30, 2007, Japan's electric utilities reported the results of a complete review of their power-generating units to the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency of the Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI). The Ethics Committee of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan (AESJ) then recommended an assessment method to analyze the seriousness of the problems from multiple perspectives in order to support the public's understanding of the reported problems. Accordingly, the Ethics Committee conducted the assessment. The assessment considered each reported problem associated with nuclear power-generating units and the preventive measures completed between June 2007 and September 2008 (corrective measures continued beyond that period). The results were presented at the autumn conferences of AESJ in 2007 and 2008, and are discussed in this report.