文献一覧: 小原一馬 (著者)

Despite an abundance of application opportunities, for a long time Goffman’s sociology of play/games has practically been ignored in the studies of play theory. The aim of this paper is to give his sociology of play an appropriate position in the historical development of play theories. To this end, the following points are demonstrated: 1. What were the achievements and the problems of the play theories (of Huizinga, Caillois, and Bateson) before Goffman? 2. How did Goffman inherit the previous works’ achievements and solve their problems? 3. What kind of relationship did Goffman’s sociology of play have with Csikszentmihalyi’s flow theory, which had the greatest influence on the development of play theories after Goffman? While Caillois basically inherited Huizinga’s definitions of play he criticized Huizinga’s concept of play as being too wide, and his definitions of play are not appropriate for “play” as a whole but only to a part of it. Therefore, Caillois redefined “play” to the domain of culture, and also he classified “play” into four by two categories. Responding to Caillois’ criticism of Huizinga, Goffman developed Bateson’s frame theory, and he showed that the fun of play can be explained through a single, integrated one without any classification. This new frame theory by Goffman can be summarized as the playing field introducing various valuable things from the outside world into itself through its frame while blocking any irrelevant objects; it is important to balance the way of its reflection of the outside world in order to heighten participants’ concentration on its unique reality utilizing randomness and symbolic distance. This theory of Goffman’s is in a complementary relationship with Csikszentmihalyi’s flow theory, which also emphasizes concentration, and thus its integration will lead to a more complete theory.

2023-01-03 08:03:23
7 + 6 Twitter

6 0 0 0 IR スクールカーストはなぜ生まれ、それは「悪い」ものになってしまうのか―スクールカースト生成の歴史的要因と上位者の攻撃性が高まる要因の考察―

著者: 小原一馬 Kazuma KOHARA
出版者: 宇都宮大学共同教育学部
雑誌: 宇都宮大学共同教育学部研究紀要. 第1部 = The Research Bulletin of the Cooperative Faculty of Education Utsunomiya University. Section 1 (ISSN:24325546)
巻号頁・発行日: no.71, pp.149-174, 2021-03-31

2022-03-19 16:09:55
5 + 3 Twitter
1 + 1 Wikipedia

https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/120007026190

5 0 0 0 OA 「かわいいおばあちゃん(その1) : 現代女子大学生における「かわいい」の語法(研究発表III III-1部会青少年)

著者: 小原一馬
出版者: 日本教育社会学会
雑誌: 日本教育社会学会大会発表要旨集録
巻号頁・発行日: no.51, pp.107-108, 1999-10-01

本発表は、現代の若者、特に女子のライフコースのイメージの変化に関して、「かわいいおばあちゃん」をキーワードとする一連の調査・研究の発表の初回となる予定である。本発表では、現代女子大学生における「かわいい」という言葉の語法、特に、従来「かわいい」という形容がほとんどもちいられなかったと考えられる年上の男性、中高年の女性(特に両親、おじいちゃん、おばあちゃん)に対する「かわいい」の語法についての調査結果を示す。

2014-10-17 22:49:46
5 + 3 Twitter

https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110001891656

4 0 0 0 OA スクールカーストはなぜ生まれ、それは「悪い」ものになってしまうのか―スクールカースト生成の歴史的要因と上位者の攻撃性が高まる要因の考察―

著者: 小原一馬 Kazuma KOHARA
出版者: 宇都宮大学共同教育学部
雑誌: 宇都宮大学共同教育学部研究紀要. 第1部 = The Research Bulletin of the Cooperative Faculty of Education Utsunomiya University. Section 1 (ISSN:24325546)
巻号頁・発行日: no.71, pp.149-174, 2021-03-31

2022-07-06 14:59:22
4 + 2 Twitter

http://hdl.handle.net/10241/00012614

4 0 0 0 遊びの面白さ:遊び理論におけるゴフマン社会学の位置付け

著者: 小原一馬
出版者: 社会学研究会
雑誌: ソシオロジ (ISSN:05841380)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.56, no.2, pp.3-118, 2011

Despite an abundance of application opportunities, for a long time Goffman's sociology of play/games has practically been ignored in the studies of play theory. The aim of this paper is to give his sociology of play an appropriate position in the historical development of play theories. To this end, the following points are demonstrated: 1. What were the achievements and the problems of the play theories (of Huizinga, Caillois, and Bateson) before Goffman? 2. How did Goffman inherit the previous works' achievements and solve their problems? 3. What kind of relationship did Goffman's sociology of play have with Csikszentmihalyi's flow theory, which had the greatest influence on the development of play theories after Goffman? While Caillois basically inherited Huizinga's definitions of play he criticized Huizinga's concept of play as being too wide, and his definitions of play are not appropriate for "play" as a whole but only to a part of it. Therefore, Caillois redefined "play" to the domain of culture, and also he classified "play" into four by two categories. Responding to Caillois' criticism of Huizinga, Goffman developed Bateson's frame theory, and he showed that the fun of play can be explained through a single, integrated one without any classification. This new frame theory by Goffman can be summarized as the playing field introducing various valuable things from the outside world into itself through its frame while blocking any irrelevant objects; it is important to balance the way of its reflection of the outside world in order to heighten participants' concentration on its unique reality utilizing randomness and symbolic distance. This theory of Goffman's is in a complementary relationship with Csikszentmihalyi's flow theory, which also emphasizes concentration, and thus its integration will lead to a more complete theory.