著者

松尾 純子 Matsuo Junko

出版者

法政大学大原社会問題研究所

雑誌

大原社会問題研究所雑誌 (ISSN:09129421)

巻号頁・発行日

no.585, pp.78-81, 2007-08

---

本書は、戦後15年間(1945~60年)に限り、男性労働者と主婦に注目して、彼らが担った平和運動の意義と草の根平和主義の形成について考察している。日本の平和主義の意義と限界を、人類史としてより深く研究するための一助となる。

著者

松尾 純太郎 村山 崇 栃原 裕

出版者

日本生気象学会

雑誌

日本生気象学会雑誌 (ISSN:03891313)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.43, no.2, pp.79-89, 2006

---

本研究の目的は上下温度差の違いが温熱快適性および知的生産性に及ぼす影響を検討することである.人工気候室内に空調 BOX を設置することで,身体上部と下部の気温を独立して変化させた.健常な男子学生 8 名を被験者とし,すべての被験者は上下温度差(上部温度&minus;下部温度)が &minus;8.0℃,&minus;4.0℃,0.0℃,+4.0℃,+8.0℃となる 5 条件にそれぞれ曝露された.直腸温,平均皮膚温および全身の温冷感は各条件間で有意な差は認められなかった.上下温度差 +8℃の条件において,温熱的不快感はもっとも高い値を示した.温熱的不快感と「ねむけ感」スコアおよび「ねむけ感」スコアと各作業成績の間にそれぞれ有意な相関が認められた.これらの結果は,いわゆる「頭寒足熱」型条件は,温熱快適性を向上させるものの,眠気を誘起し,作業成績を低下させることを示唆していると考えられる.<br>

著者

松尾 純

出版者

経済学史学会

雑誌

経済学史学会年報 (ISSN:04534786)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.30, no.30, pp.120, 1992 (Released:2010-08-05)

著者

松尾 純 Jun Matsuo 桃山学院大学経済学部

出版者

桃山学院大学総合研究所

雑誌

桃山学院大学経済経営論集 = ST. ANDREW'S UNIVERSITY ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS REVIEW (ISSN:02869721)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.50, no.3, pp.59-80, 2008-12-10

---

Professor Noriko Maehata and I have been engaged in discussions concerning the understanding of the concept of "actual overproduction of capital" as contained in Karl Marx's Das Kapital Volume III. The discussion originated in Professor Maehata's criticism("'Law of the Tendency of the Rate of Profit to Fall' and 'Absolute Overproduction of Capital' - An Issue in Research on the Theory of Crisis," Economic Society of Rikkyo University(Rikkyo Keizai Gaku Kenkyu), Vol. 55, No. 1, July 2001)of my understanding of "actual overproduction of capital." I immediately responded in my paper entitled, "'Actual Overproduction of Capital' and 'Absolute Overproduction of Capital' - A Response to the Criticisms of Professor Noriko Maehata -"(St. Andrew's University Economic and Business Review, Vol. 43, No. 4, March 2002). In answer to my response, Professor Maehata published a second paper entitled, "Law of the Tendency of the Rate of Profit to Fall and Crisis - Regarding 'Actual Overproduction of Capital'"(Keizaigaku Kenkyu(Hokkaido University), Vol. 56, No. 2, November 2006). This second criticism more clearly delineated the differences in our two views. Specifically, the problems contained in Professor Maehata's understanding of "actual overproduction of capital" became very clear. The purpose of this present paper is to examine the problems in Professor Maehata's understanding of "actual overproduction of capital." In her second paper, Professor Maehata explained the mechanism of the occurrence of "actual overproduction of capital" in the form of the following causal nexus: "increased producing powers of labor → advancement of the organic composition of capital → fall in profit rate and increased mass of profit → 'concurrence among capitals("small split capitals" and "fresh branches of capital")' → rapid absorption of relative overpopulation and 'reduction' in relative overpopulation (but not its 'exhaustion')→ rise in wages → diminished degree of exploitation of labor → rapid decrease in profit rate → occurrence of 'actual overproduction of capital' → 'concurrence among capitals' → 'exhaustion' of relative overpopulation → occurrence of 'absolute overproduction of capital'." I cannot agree with Professor Maehata's explanation that "actual overproduction of capital" occurs as a result of the causal nexus: "rapid absorption of relative overpopulation → rise in wages → decrease in mass of profit → rapid decrease in profit rate." My disagreement is based on the following expositions of "actual overproduction of capital" contained in the manuscripts of Volume III of Das Kapital.(1)"Actual overproduction of capital" is the "overproduction of means of production which may serve to exploit labor at a given degree of exploitation." "A fall in the intensity of exploitation below a certain point... calls forth disturbances and stoppages in the capitalist production process, and the destruction of capital."(2)"Overproduction of capital is accompanied by more or less considerable relative overpopulation."(3)The rate of profit is lowered through the process of "increased producing powers of labor → accumulation of capital." This process simultaneously creates relative overpopulation.(4)Relative overpopulation is not employed by the surplus-capital. Even if employed, relative overpopulation would be employed at a "low degree of exploitation," which would "call forth disturbances and stoppages in the capitalist production process, and the destruction of capital." Professor Maehata makes the following argument. "Faced with a declining rate of profit, 'small split capitals' and 'fresh branches of capital' are used as capital(that is, these capitals are combined with relative overpopulation), which gives rise to 'concurrence among capitals.' In the process of 'concurrence among capitals,' overpopulation is used by capital newly trying to become independent and additions to existing capital. As a result, overpopulation is reduced." However, this is not the thinking of Marx. Marx's assertion is as follows.<" The rate of profit will fall as increased producing powers and accumulation of capital advances. However, at the same time, the mass of profit will increase. While the "increase in the mass of profit compensates for the decline in the rate of profit," this "compensation" applies "only to the total social capitals and to the big, firmly placed capitalists. The new additional capital operating independently does not enjoy any such compensating conditions. It must still win them." If they cannot "win them" through competitive struggle, these capitals become excess capital. If concurrence among capitals becomes intensified, an even greater number of "small split capitals" and "fresh branches of capital"(in other words, capital newly trying to become independent and additions to existing capital)that are unable to "exploit labor at the 'intensity of exploitation' necessary for the 'sound' and 'normal' development of the capitalist production process"(Maehata)become excess capital. At the same time, the excess population employed by excess capital will continue to increase.>

著者

松尾 純廣 出川 通 安部 博文

出版者

特定非営利活動法人 産学連携学会

雑誌

産学連携学 (ISSN:13496913)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.8, no.2, pp.2_1-2_23, 2012 (Released:2012-06-20)

参考文献数

51

---

本稿の課題は,「大学発ベンチャー」を対象として産学官連携によるイノベーションのプロセスと方法について明らかにすることである.主な分析方法は,次の3つである.第1に,イノベーション・マネジメントによる大学研究成果のイノベーション・プロセス分析.第2に,MOTによるベンチャー企業の「死の谷」分析.第3に,インキュベーション・マネジメントによる「大学発ベンチャー」のケーススタディ.その結果,第1に,イノベーション・プロセスにおける「大学発ベンチャー」の位置付け,第2に,「大学発ベンチャー」のイノベーション・マネジメント手法に関する一定の知見(「魔の川」のマネジメント,「死の谷」のマネジメント)を得た.

著者

松尾 純治 棚橋 寿倫 田中 博史 和田 智之

出版者

日本鉄道技術協会特定部会日本鉄道サイバネティクス協議会・事務局

雑誌

Cybernetics : quarterly report (ISSN:18836690)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.22, no.1, pp.16-20, 2017-01-01