文献一覧: 栗原彬 (著者)

12 0 0 0 OA 動物心理学における再現可能性の問題

著者: 澤幸祐栗原彬
出版者: 心理学評論刊行会
雑誌: 心理学評論 (ISSN:03861058)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.59, no.1, pp.46-56, 2016 (Released:2018-04-13)
参考文献数: 40
被引用文献数: 6

The reproducibility and reliability of research are fundamental tenets in science, and in animal psychology. In the field of animal psychology, researchers have used a number of different species in various tasks and settings, such that considerations of the reproducibility are necessary compared with human research. Furthermore, using the appropriate statistical analysis and improving experimental design, a concrete theoretical background underlying each research question seems only to be important for improving the reproducibility between experiments in which the same species were used, but also in the situation where different species have been used. Because it is sometimes difficult to standardize the tasks and settings among investigations in animal psychology, theoretical consideration should help improve the reproducibility of research, as well as the validity of the interpretation of results obtained. Such efforts would also contribute to reduce the unnecessary use of animals from the perspective of animal welfare.

2023-10-27 21:59:52
12 + 17 Twitter

3 0 0 0 OA 「新しい人」の政治の方へ

著者: 栗原彬
出版者: 日本政治学会
雑誌: 年報政治学 (ISSN:05494192)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.58, no.2, pp.2_142-2_162, 2007 (Released:2012-11-06)

In the postwar Japan, productivity-oriented Keynesian welfare state caused marginal people like Minamata sufferers pollution and social exclusion. Politics of neo-liberalism and globalization have not only aggravated social exclusion of marginal people, but brought about new social exclusion inside the civil society. “New Men” who rose up among Minamata sufferers have constructed Human Politics, differentiated from citizen's politics, as counter politics against social exclusion. The action-framework of Human Politics is compounded of survival politics, convivial politics and existence-oriented politics. It could be shared with the newly excluded poor.