文献一覧: 河内春人 (著者)

6 0 0 0 OA 古代東アジアにおける政治的流動性と人流

著者: 河内春人
出版者: 専修大学社会知性開発研究センター
雑誌: 専修大学社会知性開発研究センター古代東ユーラシア研究センター年報
巻号頁・発行日: vol.3, pp.103-121, 2017-03

文部科学省私立大学戦略的研究基盤形成支援事業

2022-04-14 12:32:41
6 + 1 Wikipedia

2 0 0 0 OA 『新唐書』日本伝の成立

著者: 河内春人
出版者: 東洋文庫
雑誌: 東洋学報 = The Toyo Gakuho (ISSN:03869067)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.86, no.2, pp.185-215, 2004-09

The official history of the Tang Dynasty is contained in two volumes, the Jiu-Tangshu 旧唐書 and Xin-Tangshu 新唐書, both of which are said to have original content. This article examines their value as source materials through an analysis of their content, focusing on the information they provide regarding Japan.Originally, the Chinese Dynasties acquired their information about foreign affairs through the Honglusi 鴻臚寺 office, which was in charge of entertaining foreign guests. Reports would be made to the emperor, then the information was transferred to the compilers of official histories. In the case of the Xin-Tangshu, compiled in 1060, information on Japan centers around the genealogy of the royal family, the Onendaiki 王年代紀, prepared by the Buddhist monk Chonen 奝然, who had visited China in 984. What appeared in the compilation was an account of the genealogy with its Buddhist information replaced by facts about Japanese emissaries paying tribute. For this reason, the Xin-Tangshu contains no new information about Japan, relying mainly on what was contained in the Jiu-Tangshu and supplementing it with accounts from the Tanghuiyao 唐会要, etc.Moreover, from the mid-Tang through the first half of the Song 宋 period, a confusion existed about Japan in the form of distinguishing between the kingdoms of Wo 倭 and Nippon 日本, which was the name adopted under the Ritsuryo 律令 system. However, the Xin-Tangshu contains only a section dealing with Nippon, having combined the information on the two kingdoms. This is how the Onendaiki functioned to consolidate the information about Japan in China from the mid-eleventh century on.

2022-11-10 09:40:57
1 + 3 Twitter
1 + 1 Wikipedia

http://id.nii.ac.jp/1629/00006079/

2 0 0 0 IR 詔勅・処分に見る新羅観と新羅征討政策 (特集日本・中国・朝鮮関係史の研究)

著者: 河内春人
出版者: 明治大学史学地理学会
雑誌: 駿台史学 (ISSN:05625955)
巻号頁・発行日: no.108, pp.23-42, 1999-12

2022-03-19 19:36:03
2 + 2 Wikipedia

https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/120001438973

1 0 0 0 OA 唐から見たエミシ : 中国史料の分析を通して

著者: 河内春人
出版者: 公益財団法人史学会
雑誌: 史学雑誌 (ISSN:00182478)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.113, no.1, pp.43-61, 2004-01-20 (Released:2017-12-01)

The Emishi 蝦夷, who resided in the northeast portion of the Jap-anese archipelago, appear in the Chinese sources both as "Emishi" and as "Mojin" 毛人. The description of the former includes their geographical location, customs and year of arrival in China, while the latter merely mentions them as living in northeastern Japan. All of this information was amassed from interviews with foreign emissaries to the Tang Dynasty. Regarding the Emishi, there are both Chinese and Japanese records of them accompanying an envoy from the land of Wa 倭 (Japan) in the year AD 659 and also an account of the Chinese inquiring about them from a Japanese envoy in AD 702 ; however, the latter account, which appears in Shin-Tojo 新唐書, cannot be verified, so 659 is the only time that Emishi became part of a Japanese envoy to China. The information concerning Emishi customs in the Chinese sources matches the content of the report submitted by the 659 Wa envoy to China ; and all of it is characterized by them being introduced through Japan. In particular, the inclusion of Emishi in the 659 envoy was politically motivated to create the image of Wa/Japan as a great empire, but the Tang Dynasty was not impressed. As a result, the Japanese were unable to realize their diplomatic goals, and a gap appeared in the international relations between the two countries. While the Japanese expressed the term "Emishi" with the characters 蝦夷, there is also the strong opinion that the characters 蝦〓 were originally used. However, the source for such an argument being the historically spurious Shin-Tojo, there is no other source to prove that ; and the manuscript of the Nihon Shoki 日本書紀 expresses the term with different characters. The expression 蝦夷 appeared during the late seventh century, together with the creation of a Wa/Japanese ideology concerning its frontiers, leading to the move to take Emishi to China. However, the existence of the Emishi in Tang-Wa diplomacy following the Japan defeat at the Hakuson 白村 River in Korea, had to be covered up, as the term Mojin came into use at the time of the Taiho era Japanese envoys to China. After that time, no new information about the people of northeastern Japan surfaced in Tang China.