著者
鈴木 宏尚 SUZUKI Hironao
出版者
名古屋大学大学院法学研究科
雑誌
名古屋大學法政論集 (ISSN:04395905)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.260, pp.253-275, 2015-02-25 (Released:2015-03-05)

本論文は、平成23-26年度科学研究費補助金基盤研究(A)(課題番号23243026)「日米特殊関係による東アジア地域再編の政治経済史研究」の助成を受けた研究成果の一部である。
著者
鈴木 宏尚 SUZUKI Hironao
出版者
名古屋大学大学院法学研究科
雑誌
名古屋大學法政論集 (ISSN:04395905)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.260, pp.253-275, 2015-02-25

本論文は、平成23-26年度科学研究費補助金基盤研究(A)(課題番号23243026)「日米特殊関係による東アジア地域再編の政治経済史研究」の助成を受けた研究成果の一部である。
著者
鈴木 宏尚
出版者
名古屋大学大学院法学研究科
雑誌
名古屋大学法政論集 (ISSN:04395905)
巻号頁・発行日
no.260, pp.253-275, 2015-02

本論文は、平成23-26年度科学研究費補助金基盤研究(A)(課題番号23243026)「日米特殊関係による東アジア地域再編の政治経済史研究」の助成を受けた研究成果の一部である。
著者
鈴木 宏尚
出版者
財団法人 日本国際政治学会
雑誌
国際政治 (ISSN:04542215)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.2008, no.151, pp.89-104,L11, 2008-03-15 (Released:2010-09-01)
参考文献数
83

This article explores the foreign policy of the Hayato Ikeda administration toward the “Free World” of the United States and its European allies. In July 1960 in the immediate aftermath of the controversy surrounding revision of the U. S. -Japan security treaty, the Ikeda cabinet found itself in the midst of domestic turmoil and felt the sense of losing credibility from the international liberal camp. Hence it was imperative for the cabinet to stabilize domestic politics and restore Western trust on balance.The Ikeda cabinet sought to unify the nation in the economic sphere by adopting the Doubling National Income Plan. The plan relied on Western markets as exclusively export-oriented destinations for economic growth leading to European powers, such as Britain and France, to invoke the General Agreement of Tariff and Trade (GATT) Article XXXV to discriminate against Japanese imports. Improvement of relations with Europe was thus imminent for the sake of economic growth.This meant the Ikeda administration's effort to integrate Japan in the liberal camp via the deepening of its relations with the West. Subsequent diplomatic investment resulted in Japan's forging an “equal partnership” with Washington, gaining access to the meetings of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), and European states' discontinuation of discriminatory measures. Hence Japan established itself to be part of the Free World.One can consider the movement against the U. S. -Japan security treaty as an intensification of “domestic cold war” closely associated with the Japan's position in “international cold war.” Ikeda won the domestic cold war by way of economic growth, which required Japan to be part of the West during the international cold war. In other words, the success of the Ikeda administration in balancing its domestic economic agenda with international situations epitomizes the interaction between domestic politics and foreign policy.
著者
鈴木 宏尚
出版者
財団法人 日本国際政治学会
雑誌
国際政治 (ISSN:04542215)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.2005, no.140, pp.57-72,L8, 2005-03-19 (Released:2010-09-01)
参考文献数
79

This article examines the diplomatic process of Japan's joining in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and illustrates that Japan's participating in the OECD should be regarded as its struggle for expanding its diplomatic space in the Free World, searching for both political and economic interests.The OECD, which was reorganized from the Organization European Economic Corporation (OEEC) under the initiative of the United States in 1961, was a forum established with the purpose of coordinating economic, trade and foreign aid policy among its members. Almost all the developed countries in the so called the “Free Word” or the West, including the US, Western European nations and Canada joined the OECD as its original members, but Japan was not one of them. This caused Japan to hold serious concerns about its isolation from the Free World. Japan had already established bilateral relations between the US, through which Japan and the Free World were only linked together. In that situation, Japan had an aspiration for expanding its diplomatic space in the Free World beyond its relations to the US, by participating in the OECD. Moreover, Hayato Ikeda administration, which wanted Japan to be equal footing with the US and European countries, considered that the membership of the OECD was essential to keep its economic growth. Thus it can be said that Japans' aim of joining in the organization was to pursue both economic and political interests.For the part of the US, Japan's participation in the OECD was regarded as its own interest, since it might enhance Japan's cooperation on economic assistance to the developing countries and strengthen its relation to the Free World stronger. Hence Japan was allowed its membership in the Development Assistance Group (DAG) of the OEEC in 1960. After OECD set on, the DAG was reorganized as the Development Assistance Committee (DAC), which was one of the main committees of the OECD. The biggest obstacle to Japan's joining in the main body of OECD was that European countries, which were the majority of the organization, opposed to it.Japan made diplomatic efforts to gain the support from European countries with the assistance of the US. Prime Minister Ikeda's visit to the European countries including the United Kingdom, France, West Germany and so on paved the way for the membership of the OECD. Through the discussion with Ikeda, the heads of these countries agreed to Japan's joining in the OECD. In March 1963, the OECD ultimately accepted Japan's full membership.
著者
鈴木 宏尚
出版者
一般財団法人平和・安全保障研究所
雑誌
若手研究(B)
巻号頁・発行日
2008

本研究は、日本、米国、英国、カナダ、経済協力開発機構(OECD)の外交文書を収集し、マルチアーカイバル・アプローチによって、日本のOECD加盟を国際関係史の視点から検討した。そしてOECDが「冷戦」と「経済」が交錯した場であり、日本のOECD加盟外交においても「冷戦の論理」が用いられていたという知見を得た。