文献一覧: 鈴木良隆 (著者)

17 0 0 0 OA 職員層への女性の進出と「女の仕事」の形成 1918~41年:三菱で働いた1,642人に見る

著者: 鈴木良隆
出版者: 公益財団法人三菱経済研究所
雑誌: 三菱史料館論集 (ISSN:13453076)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.2023, no.24, pp.91-108, 2023-03-20 (Released:2023-08-01)

2023-08-04 11:53:25
17 + 37 Twitter

2 0 0 0 OA イギリス産業革命と労務管理

著者: 鈴木良隆
出版者: 経営史学会
雑誌: 経営史学 (ISSN:03869113)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.5, no.2, pp.23-45,ii, 1971-03-25 (Released:2010-11-18)

This thesis deals with two aspects of labour management of the Lancashire cotton industry during the first half of the 1830's; 1) organization within workshops and 2) the efficient use of labour. The main difficulties of these two aspects as faced by mill-owners during the Industrial Revolution Era has been repeatedly pointed out by Andrew Ure.1) As regards organization within workshops: as a conclusion of the author's study of that “Indirect Employment by the Master”, the intervention by the mill-owner in the matter of the management is clearly seen in several points. On the other hand, under “Direct Employment by the Masters”, the centralized management by mill-owners can be seen but even in that case there was no completed organization of management from the first. The work of the overseer was differenciated because of the division of processes, due to the expansion of the mills, and the regulation of the organization of operation.2) As regards the efficient use of labour: though attention was paid to the appropriate placement of the labour and the skill, the maintenance of factory discipline was the most significant. For the maintaining of discipline the use of fines and threat importance was attached to educating for the purpose of moral improvement.

1 0 0 0 OA 「内部請負制」は一九世紀イギリスの工場における作業組織を、有効に説明するか?

著者: 鈴木良隆
出版者: 経営史学会
雑誌: 経営史学 (ISSN:03869113)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.20, no.2, pp.1-21,i, 1985-07-30 (Released:2009-11-06)

To mention subcontract has been an answer to the question how the factories were operated in nineteenth century Britain. First, this article examines whether or to what extent this system was prevalent, and second, whether it played the same managerial functions in various industry branches. Finally, in place of subcontract, a different framework in interpretating the nineteenth century employment is proposed. Whether the subcontract system was prevalent or not can be measured by investigating the forms of wages paid to the foremen or skilled workers who were in charge of a group of workers. Some were paid by piece, but they were mostly paid by time. In the latter case, these workers were not subcontractors. More important still was the attitude of skilled workers to subcontract or 'piece-masters', and further to the forms of payment, which differed from industry to industry. These indicate that the subcontact did not carry out the same managerial function throughout all the industries. Further, in spite of these seemingly different attitudes to wages and employment, they have one motive in common, i.e., to maintain the autonomy of skilled workers. Various facts can be interpretated more successfully by using a different framework rather than by subcontract. That is to use the idea of internalisation of production function and the transaction of labour to the manufacturing firms. In these respects, autonomy of skilled workers lies in the intermediate areas between the systematically organised workshops since the end of the nineteenth century and the sequential spot contracts of labour before the Industrial Revolution.