著者
Yuki TAKANO Tatsuya ISHIKAWA Takayuki FUNATSU Seiichiro EGUCHI Masatake SUMI Koji YAMAGUCHI Takakazu KAWAMATA
出版者
The Japan Neurosurgical Society
雑誌
NMC Case Report Journal (ISSN:21884226)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.9, pp.371-376, 2022-12-31 (Released:2022-11-09)
参考文献数
20

Spontaneous internal carotid artery dissection (CAD) is a relatively rare disease, with patients, including those with bilateral CAD, often recovering after conservative therapy. However, patients with symptomatic and progressive disease require urgent carotid artery stenting (CAS). If CAD extends to the petrous portion of the internal carotid artery (ICA), it is difficult to treat with a carotid stent alone. This report describes a rare case of consecutive spontaneous bilateral CAD that required an intracranial stent with an interval of 4 years between the first and second CAS. A 58-year-old man with a history of dyslipidemia was admitted for transient ischemic attacks. He underwent CAS with carotid and intracranial stents on the third day for the left CAD due to exacerbation of symptoms under antithrombotic therapy and new stroke on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). He recovered well. However, 4 years after the initial treatment, the patient was admitted again because of a sudden headache, photophobia, and transient weakness of the left lower limb. He was diagnosed with CAD on the contralateral side. He underwent CAS with carotid and intracranial stents due to progressive neurological deterioration under antithrombotic therapy. After treatment, he was clinically stable without any new infarctions on a follow-up MRI. He was discharged without neurological deficit. Our case of bilateral internal CAD treatment demonstrated that early revascularization with immediate stenting with carotid and intracranial stents in CAD contributes to the prevention of extensive neurological damage, thereby providing a favorable outcome in some cases.
著者
Tsuyoshi Ohta Tetsu Satow Manabu Inoue Kanta Tanaka Junpei Koge Takeshi Yoshimoto Eika Hamano Taichi Ikedo Masatake Sumi Koji Shimonaga Yuji Kushi Hisae Mori Koji Iihara Masafumi Ihara Masatoshi Koga Kazunori Toyoda Hiroharu Kataoka
出版者
The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy
雑誌
Journal of Neuroendovascular Therapy (ISSN:18824072)
巻号頁・発行日
pp.oa.2022-0018, (Released:2022-07-20)
参考文献数
17

Objective: To evaluate whether changes in the practice of mechanical thrombectomy could affect the clinical outcomes during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic.Methods: Patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy from April 2019 to March 2021 for anterior circulation proximal large artery occlusion in our institute were divided into two groups of pre- and post-COVID-19, with April 2020 assumed to be the start of the COVID-19 era with the first declaration of a state of emergency. We compared patient characteristics, proportions of patient selection depending on rapid processing of perfusion and diffusion (RAPID) CT perfusion, outcomes including treatment variables such as time and reperfusion status, and patient independence at 3 months.Results: Data for 112 patients (median age, 79 years; 44 females) were included in the analysis. A total of 50 patients were assigned to the pre-COVID-19 group (45%). More patients were selected with RAPID CT perfusion in the post-COVID-19 compared with the pre-COVID-19 (69% vs. 16%; P <0.001). Treatment details and clinical outcomes did not differ between the groups, including the door-to-puncture time (median [interquartile range], 66 [54–90] min vs. 74 [61–89] min; P = 0.15), proportions of significant reperfusion (82% vs. 87%; P = 0.60), and modified Rankin scale score of ≤2 at 3 months (46% vs. 45%; P >0.99). Multivariate logistic regression analysis for the clinical outcome of modified Rankin scale score of ≤2 at 3 months was performed and included the following factors: age, sex, the onset-to-door time, significant reperfusion, and pre- and post-COVID-19. The treatment period did not influence the outcomes (post-COVID-19 group, odds ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.34–1.85, P = 0.59).Conclusion: In the setting of a limited access to emergency MRI during the COVID-19 pandemic, RAPID CT perfusion was performed significantly more often. Changes in the practice of mechanical thrombectomy with the protected code stroke did not bring the different level of treatment and clinical outcomes as before.