- 著者
- Kazuho Yoshida Takahiro Yamashita Kengo Sasaki Keiichi Inoue Yoshinori Shichida Hideki Kandori
- 出版者
- The Biophysical Society of Japan
- 雑誌
- Biophysics and Physicobiology (ISSN:21894779)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.14, pp.183-190, 2017 (Released:2017-12-19)
- 参考文献数
- 44
- 被引用文献数
- 4
We previously showed that the chimeric proteins of microbial rhodopsins, such as light-driven proton pump bacteriorhodopsin (BR) and Gloeobacter rhodopsin (GR) that contain cytoplasmic loops of bovine rhodopsin, are able to activate Gt protein upon light absorption. These facts suggest similar protein structural changes in both the light-driven proton pump and animal rhodopsin. Here we report two trials to engineer chimeric rhodopsins, one for the inserted loop, and another for the microbial rhodopsin template. For the former, we successfully activated Gs protein by light through the incorporation of the cytoplasmic loop of β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR). For the latter, we did not observe any G-protein activation for the light-driven sodium pump from Indibacter alkaliphilus (IndiR2) or a light-driven chloride pump halorhodopsin from Natronomonas pharaonis (NpHR), whereas the light-driven proton pump GR showed light-dependent G-protein activation. This fact suggests that a helix opening motion is common to G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) and GR, but not to IndiR2 and NpHR. Light-induced difference FTIR spectroscopy revealed similar structural changes between WT and the third loop chimera for each light-driven pump. A helical structural perturbation, which was largest for GR, was further enhanced in the chimera. We conclude that similar structural dynamics that occur on the cytoplasmic side of GPCR are needed to design chimeric microbial rhodopsins.
- 著者
- Takahiro Yamashita Akihisa Terakita Yoshinori Shichida
- 出版者
- The Japanese Biochemical Society
- 雑誌
- The Journal of Biochemistry (ISSN:0021924X)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.130, no.1, pp.149-155, 2001 (Released:2008-11-18)
- 参考文献数
- 45
G protein-coupled receptors identified so far are classified into at least three major families based on their amino acid sequences. For the family of receptors homologous to rhodopsin (family 1), the G protein activation mechanism has been investigated in detail, but much less for the receptors of other families. To functionally compare the G protein activation mechanism between rhodopsin and metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR), which belong to distinct families, we prepared a set of bovine rhodopsin mutants whose second or third cytoplasmic loop was replaced with either the second or third loop of Gi/Go-or Gq-coupled mGluR (mGluR6 or mGluR1). Among these mutants, the mutants in which the second or third loop was replaced with the corresponding loop of mGluR exhibited no G protein activation ability. In contrast, the mutant whose third loop was replaced with the second loop of Gi/Go-coupled mGluR6 efficiently activated Gi but not Gt: this activation profile is almost identical with those of the mutant rhodopsins whose third loop was replaced with those of the Gi/Go-coupled receptors in family 1 [Yamashita et al. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 34272-34279]. The mutant whose third loop was replaced with the second loop of Gq-coupled mGluR1 partially retained the Gi coupling ability of rhodopsin, which is in contrast to the fact that all the rhodopsin mutants having the third loops of Gq-coupled receptors in family 1 exhibit no detectable Gi activation. These results strongly suggest that the molecular architectures of rhodopsin and mGluR are different, although the G protein activation mechanism involving the cytoplasmic loops is common.