著者
石野 美久 ISHINO Miku
出版者
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科 教育科学専攻
雑誌
教育論叢 (ISSN:0288996X)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.62, pp.15-27, 2019-03-20

In this research, I picked up the brass band club of junior high school and presented the possibility that an educational viewpoint intervened in the review of the All Japan Wind Instruments Competition by reviewing the music magazine "Band Journal". Among the reviews of "Band Journal", there are several educational viewpoint and they are classified as follows: 1, Closeness to natural style of junior high school student. 2, Development stage. (It is further divided into "effort, attitude to challenge", "performance technique", "music selection".) 3, Background of practicing process and club activity. 4, Physical performance other than musical performance. Originally, each performance is evaluated only by technological skill and expression skill. However, it turned out that the educational point of view mentioned above exists in "Band Journal" as a substitute for the competition evaluation. Advisers and members of the brass band club who think "Band Journal" has the evaluation of official competition may reflect the educational perspective in daily exercises and performances. In addition, because the educational viewpoint intervenes in the brass band competition though "B J," the brass band competition has two characteristics that is not only a competitive aspect but also an ducational aspect. By this research, it was suggested that the brass band contest of the junior high school has another aspect.
著者
須田 昂宏 SUDA Takahiro
出版者
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科 教育科学専攻
雑誌
教育論叢 (ISSN:0288996X)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.58, pp.19-34, 2015-03-21 (Released:2015-06-30)

This research focuses on Reaction-Paper as a clue to understand students’ learning in a lesson, and examines how to utilize the descriptive contents of Reaction-Paper. As a result of examining nine precedent studies that try to understand students’ learning by using their descriptive contents of Reaction-Paper, three are suggested. First, precedent studies can be classified into [the fact report type], [the qualitative interpretation type] and [the category analysis type], but each type has its own weakness. Therefore, a new analytical method that enables us to understand students’ learning “specifically” and “systematically” is needed. Second, research to analyze various aspects of students’ learning organically is needed. And finally, research to correlate Reaction-Paper with other related data is needed.