著者
伊藤 大幸
出版者
日本認知科学会
雑誌
認知科学 (ISSN:13417924)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.17, no.2, pp.297-312, 2010 (Released:2010-12-17)
参考文献数
52
被引用文献数
4

Incongruity theory holds a dominant position in explaining the mechanisms behind humor as a transient emotional reaction accompanied by laughing or smiling. However, there are two opposing models of this theory: the incongruity model and the incongruity-resolution model. This study looks at the differences in the role of the incongruity concept in each model and proposes an integrative model that clearly differentiates between structural incongruity as peculiarity and logical incongruity as the lack of causal relation between information. To test this integrative model, I manipulated these two different incongruities separately by changing the descriptions in the stimulus episodes. The results showed that each type of incongruity independently influenced the elicitation of humor. The possibility of confounding between the two factors was clearly negated by the results of the manipulation check and the general linear model analysis. These indicated the validity of the conceptualization of my integrative model, which can provide a unified theoretical framework for future humor studies.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (4 users, 4 posts, 21 favorites)

大喜利でウケたい気持ちが高まりすぎてついに認知心理学の論文を読む段階に入りました 伊藤 大幸 (2010). ユーモアの生起過程における論理的不適合および構造的不適合の役割 
伊藤大幸(2010) ユーモアの生起過程における論理的不適合および構造的不適合の役割"Cognitive Studies",17,297-312 https://t.co/YaeI2OVWyK
もっと詳しくやられていた [伊藤2010] https://t.co/QcJQokpuks では不適合を論理(因果性の欠如)と構造(組み合わせの特異さ)に対するものに分けている。その上で、ユーモア自体は"構造"から生じ、"論理"の解決が"構造"の認知に寄与する場合もある、というモデルを立て、実験から妥当性を支持している

収集済み URL リスト