著者
倉光 ミナ子
出版者
一般社団法人 人文地理学会
雑誌
人文地理 (ISSN:00187216)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.50, no.4, pp.383-395, 1998-08-28 (Released:2009-04-28)
参考文献数
36

A lot of research on reclamation settlements has been done by Japanese geographers. Most of it has been the studies developing statistical data and not focusing on the consciousness of the settlers who actually built the settlements. The culture, especially ritual, transplanted from their homeland to their new settlement has a significance as a symbol in the process of settling. The purpose of this study is to consider the relationship between the formation of reclaimed settlements and ‘revived’ ritual in terms of the settlers.The field of the study, ‘Miyuki-cho’, is formally divided into Nishimiyuki and Higashimiyuki-cho in Toyohashi-shi. It was settled immediately after the Second World War. In 1945, a group of people from Toyone village, the north-eastern part of Aichi Prefecture, started to settle in this area. That was a policy of Toyone village because of its lack of land for cultivation. As reclamation was conducted by Iwanishi agricultural cooperative association, this settlement became a highly united one in comparison with other settlements. In 1949, the Miyuki shrine was established as a result of transplanting a part of their original settlements' shrines. This provided the necessary setting for the settlers to start a ritual, Hanamatsuri, in 1956.There were two contexts in reviving Hanamatsuri. First, the tools for Hanamatsuri were transferred from the people of the Bunchi settlement in Toyone village, who had to move from their original site because of the construction of the Sakuma dam. Among the tools Onimen (mask of gods) is the most crucial one and is the object of worship by the people. Secondly, the cognition of the people concerning Hanamatsuri is significant. They used to learn Hanamatsuri customs in their youth in their home village. It was natural for the people to practice Hanamatsuri and they never questioned its meaning.In conclusion, the settlers started Hanamatsuri as it was indispensable for their life. It was important to revive Hanamatsuri in the process of developing settlements as it meant a final success of their reclamation for the settlers. In sum, in considering the formation of the reclamation settlements, not only physical and economic points of view, but also socio-cultural and subjective viewpoints are necessary.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (4 users, 8 posts, 7 favorites)

@qattuie こちらをご参照ください。 "開拓地の形成と「花祭り」の再生 愛知県豊橋市「幸 (みゆき) 町」を事例に" 倉光ミナ子 お茶の水女子大学・院 公開日 2009/04/28 https://t.co/5qxQKSQCPv
@KatsuoOkuhara こちらの論文が参考になります。 開拓地の形成と「花祭り」の再生 愛知県豊橋市「幸 (みゆき) 町」を事例に 倉光 ミナ子 お茶の水女子大学・院 https://t.co/3a9erA2Y9z https://t.co/5qxQKSQCPv
@KatsuoOkuhara こちらの論文が参考になります。 開拓地の形成と「花祭り」の再生 愛知県豊橋市「幸 (みゆき) 町」を事例に 倉光 ミナ子 お茶の水女子大学・院 https://t.co/3a9erA2Y9z https://t.co/5qxQKSQCPv
豊橋花祭の起こりについて、興味深いジャーナルです。 人文地理学からのアプローチです。 人文地理Vol. 50 (1998) No. 4 P 383-395 開拓地の形成と「花祭り」の再生 愛知県豊橋市「幸 (みゆき) 町」を事例に https://t.co/vHOCy0XD7L

収集済み URL リスト