著者
中尾 央
出版者
The Philosophy of Science Society, Japan
雑誌
科学哲学 (ISSN:02893428)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.46, no.1, pp.1-16, 2012 (Released:2016-01-13)
参考文献数
31

For the last two decades, since Barkow et al. (1992), evolutionary psychology has been fiercely criticized by many philosophers of science and other scientists. This article aims to rebut these criticisms and defend the research program of evolutionary psychology. I mainly focus on three criticisms: (1) we have not evolved as many modules in the changing environments as evolutionary psychologists have assumed, (2) massive modularity hypothesis fails, and (3) it is difficult to infer the present from the past. Through rebutting them, I conclude that evolutionary psychology is methodologically valid, and also empirically promising to some degree.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

はてなブックマーク (1 users, 1 posts)

Twitter (3 users, 3 posts, 0 favorites)

J-STAGE Articles - 進化心理学の擁護—批判の論駁を通じて https://t.co/cFlf48Vs1W

収集済み URL リスト