著者
納富 信留
出版者
日本哲学会
雑誌
哲学 (ISSN:03873358)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.2017, no.68, pp.45-62, 2017-04-01 (Released:2017-06-14)
参考文献数
1

In the first part of this paper, in order to reconsider the significance of the history of philosophy, I examine its relationship with philosophy in three respects. First, the history of philosophy aims to examine the beginning (archē) of philosophy. By revealing its beginnings (not only in ancient Greece), we can start to engage in a new philosophy. Second, the history provides us with philosophical texts that encourage our thinking. We find there rich resources of reasoning and ideas on philosophical issues. Third, this history shows us our own position in two ways. It presents a set of philosophical concepts, problems and frameworks that we inherit from past philosophers. Also, an examination of this heritage reveals our own position within philosophy.In the second part, I critically survey the various candidates for “first philosopher” in ancient Greece. Each thinker, from Thales to Plato, has supporters and good justification for being considered the first. Then, in the third part, I propose a new perspective, “compound eye history”, in which we investigate plural lines of thinking. Each distinct line started from a new problem raised by a philosopher and developed through critical or positive responses by his contemporaries or later thinkers. I envisage 10 “plots” or lines of ancient philosophy by which we can conceptualise that whole intellectual activity of human life and wisdom.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (4 users, 5 posts, 11 favorites)

ネオ高等遊民さんがご紹介の通り、納富信留が柄谷行人『哲学の起源』を批判していますが、納富さんによる「哲学の起源」とでもいえる論文がネットで読めます。/「始まりを問う哲学史」 https://t.co/2ojVp4zTmz
とても素晴らしい論考を紹介していただいたのでシェアします。 納富信留氏の『始まりを問う哲学史ーー複眼的ギリシア哲学史への試み』でございます。 以下のリンクで全文読めます。 https://t.co/9JYR9PFFZs 私のようなものが感想をいうことは控えますが、氏の提言に心から賛同させていただきます! https://t.co/GOkLgJ6sQY
@nanamaru_8810 これですね!! ネットで読めるとは最近の学術誌は素晴らしい・・・ https://t.co/QGSrYkbaRG

収集済み URL リスト