著者
間山 広朗
出版者
東洋館
雑誌
教育社会学研究 (ISSN:03873145)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.70, pp.145-163, 2002
被引用文献数
11

"Ijime suicide (or suicide caused by bullying) has been one of the most serious problems in Japanese primary and secondary schools since the late 1970s. The problem has been widely studied in Japan. Generally speaking, the prevailing view is that though bullying has always existed, the situation of children committing suicide because of bullying is getting worse. Against this prevailing view, some scholars in the field of the sociology of education claim that "ijime suicides" existed in the past, and bullying condition may not be getting worse, but what has happened is that people have become more sensitive. In other words, they refer to the social condition itself. However, if we strictly observe the methodological standard of social constructionism, the bracketing of the ontological status of "social problems, " we must conclude that they are making an error of "ontological gerrymandering." We may have a tendency to regard ijime as bullying. However, according to Jeff Coulter, To claim that 'X' is the same action as 'Y' can mean creating a connection between them rather than simply recording a pre-existing relationship. We may misunderstand the property of our description. According to Peter Winch, the human activity we study is carried on according to rules. Therefore, we need to study the rulefollowing discourse of "ijime suicide" carefully. I would claim that "ijime suicide" does not exist until people learn of this term and the discourse. This is not an empirical, but rather a conceptual problem. Consequently, the aim of this paper is to solve this problems and explain "ijime suicide" itself analytically by focusing on the discourse involved, and then to indicate the possibility that a discursive reformation can dissolve "ijime suicide."""

言及状況

はてなブックマーク (6 users, 6 posts)

[論文][社会学][あとで読む]
[sociology] 間山 広朗「概念分析としての言説分析:「いじめ自殺」の<根絶=解消>へ向けて」
[教育][自殺] イジメが自殺の動機の語彙になるという話だが他の動機が今までも自殺はされてきた。名目はどうあれ自殺総数が減らない限り意味無かろう。ポストモダニズムに拘泥しないと宣言してるが拘泥しているように見える。

Twitter (53 users, 83 posts, 57 favorites)

久々に観ましたが、いじめ問題に関して示唆に富む、質の高い論文だと思います。https://t.co/L3nHxwUlL9
「いじめの苦しみ」の一般的な表現形態が「自殺」であるかのような認識構造が成立していること(http://t.co/Pq9hYODyzK)は大きな問題であり、たとえば鬱状態にあるという診断を得ることが自殺の機能的等価物になりうるように現実や言説を変えてゆくことができないものか。
「いじめ自殺」という言葉は両義的だ。 自殺の原因としていじめを告発できる。 他方で,「いじめを受けたのだから自殺に値する」という思考を導いてしまう。 詳しくはこちら(学会賞受賞論文)→ ▼間山広朗/概念分析としての言説分析 http://t.co/tLuHN3yjFO
間山広朗「概念分析としての言説分析-「いじめ自殺」の〈根絶=解消〉へ向けて-」(pdf)http://t.co/VQS4oq3S
こちらからPDFで→http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110001878026

収集済み URL リスト