著者
利光 功
出版者
美学会
雑誌
美學 (ISSN:05200962)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.45, no.3, pp.1-11, 1994-12-31

From the second half of the 1940's to the first half of the 1960's, as is generally known, the linguistic analytic method has dominated over Anglo-American aesthetics. Recently this aesthetics, now colled anaylitic aesthetics, has been retrospected and reexamined by the various sides. Then, we also would like to analyze and loom up its primitive figure, focussing on the William Elton (Ed.) ; Aesthetics and Language (1954). In our view, analytic aesthetics can be characterized by the following three aspects, that is, its presupposition, theme and aim. (1) Analytic aestheics presupposes that the aesthetic discourse must be fundamentally empirical scientific, and based on the fact or its experience. (2) Its main theme is to analyze the ambiguous concepts and propositions, and to clarify the aesthetic discourse. (3) Its final aim is to take up the position that there is no such thing as essence in art and, therefore, no criterion for the judicial criticism. And J. A. Passmore once called aesthetics which searches for essence or the general properties dreary. Our conclusion, however, is that not aesthetics proper but analytic asethetics is dreary, for the latter never affords any insights about aesthetic or artistic phenomena.

言及状況

はてなブックマーク (6 users, 6 posts)

[美学][論文][study][critique] via あおいんさん。批評と分析美学の歴史的な関係をデッサンしてもいる
[aesthetics][cinii] 利光 功

Twitter (4 users, 4 posts, 7 favorites)

分析美学は分析哲学からかなり分派化した領域に思えるが、ホワイトヘッドやラッセルの基礎に戻った方が普遍性があると思う。数理的に見えて、現代の分析美学は汎用性が狭い。その辺りを書かれた論考かと。http://t.co/svwPdWLM95
@torakoyama 日本での分析美学については、すでに主要学会誌上で壮大にdisられた歴史もありますので、それなりに覚悟はしております・・・。利光功(1994)「美学はわびしいか : 分析美学の射程と限界」 http://t.co/LZ1pSudY @kasa12345
かつて「美学はわびしいか」とかいう論文を読んだことがあって、結論は「分析美学はわびしい」という感じなんだけど、うちの先生も割かしそういうことを感じているのかもしれない。 http://t.co/IgqMgSvT
CiNii 論文 -  美学はわびしいか : 分析美学の射程と限界 http://t.co/vU2p2U8z

収集済み URL リスト