著者
丸山 和昭
出版者
日本教育社会学会
雑誌
教育社会学研究 (ISSN:03873145)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.75, pp.85-104, 2004-11-15

Organizations of clinical psychologist were organized on two occasions in Japan at the initiative of professional societies. The move toward professionalization in the 1960s used a strategy which gave priority to the acquisition of specialist status and autonomy than to obtaining a state-granted qualification. As a result, it failed to obtain the support of professionals working in the clinical field. However, in the 1970s, the whole clinical mental occupation reached consensus on the need to promote specialist status, from a sense of crisis brought about by the unwillingness of the Ministry of Health and Welfare and doctors to create a qualification. In the second professionalization in the 1980s, calls were made for the advancement of specialist status and the establishment of a training system. Thanks to a strategy of professionalization aimed at developing an educational field, it came to attain "miraculous" growth. This professionalization of clinical psychologists was based on the leadership of professional societies, which developed specialist attributes for the cultivation of a "science-profession" core based on a "dual strategy", to gain professional status. The clinical psychologists used a dual strategy toward the Ministry of Health and Welfare and the Ministry of Education, expanded the market autonomously and produced a great deal of "science-profession." However, it can be said that the professional society-led model has the danger of following the route of very unstable professionalization, which can be easily influenced of many domains although it has the potential for expanding new markets and the development of an autonomous training system.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (14 users, 24 posts, 17 favorites)

カウンセラー(臨床心理士)の養成に関して、厚生省側の「教育よりも業務が先にある」の意見に耳を傾けない(反発して)、文部省接近、発展していった http://t.co/FSaOqmKqA1 けど、
丸山和昭/専門職化戦略における学会主導モデルとその構造 http://t.co/ygVdH32hhv この論文,とても勉強になります。上滑りしながら読もうと思ったのですが,ついじっくり読んでしまう。 丸山先生に,虐待防止の専門職について分析していただきたいです。
@rotemeister 1971年とその後の心理臨床学会立ち上げの流れだん http://t.co/pqUjQmvgbw のp.8 http://t.co/2vAvKFWg2J のp.7
@hiyoccoo @enaringo0903 60年代、70年代、80年代、90年代、00年代の形を変えてのリバイバルかと。 http://t.co/2vAvKFWg2J
@afcp_01 以前ロテ職人さんにも紹介 http://t.co/3WYzfrMh87 した資料です。 同著者の http://t.co/2vAvKFWg2J http://t.co/F6IlKDvHz2 後は http://t.co/pqUjQmvgbw あたりが参考かと。
@guriko_ @neko7henge 質がばらばらで、審査が煩雑( http://t.co/ltC8NEbZfN http://t.co/pqUjQmvgbw )だから指定制度にシフトしたのに、積み重ねてきたものに逆行したり、それでも質が…って認めるかどうかは不明だけど。
専門職化戦略における学会主導モデルとその構造 : 臨床心理士団体にみる国家に対する二元的戦略 丸山 和昭 http://t.co/ltC8NEbZfN

収集済み URL リスト