著者

直江 眞一 朝治 啓三 井内 太郎 國方 敬治 苑田 亜矢 都築 彰 沢田 裕治 吉武 憲司

出版者

九州大学

雑誌

基盤研究(B)

巻号頁・発行日

2003

---

本研究は、イギリス(イングランドのみならずスコットランドおよびウェールズも含む)中世史および近世史における諸史資料を、総合的・学際的・系統的に検討し、あわせて諸史資料の解釈を通して、イギリス中・近世史の再構成を試みたものである。研究分担者の間では、史資料を、[1]文書の性格に応じて、統治・行政文書(都築)、荘園関連文書(宮城)、証書(中村)、叙述史料(有光)、私文書(森下)に分類する一方、[2]発行主体に応じて、国王裁判文書(澤田)、国王立法関連文書(苑田)、国王宮廷関連文書(吉武)、国家財政関係文書(井内)、貴族家政文書(朝治)、領主支配関連文書(國方)、ジェントリ関連文書(新井)に一応分類することによって、全体として体系性を保つようにした。研究代表者および研究分担者はそれぞれ、研究対象とする史資料に関するマニュスクリプトをはじめとする1次史料に関する情報を国内外の図書館・文書館から収集し、それらを分析・整理する一方で、とりわけ研究会における共同討議を重視した。毎年度2回、研究期間全体で8回開催された研究会の活動を通して、史資料に関する情報の共有化、さらには各史資料の間での形態・様式・機能・伝来状況の比較研究等、個人レヴェルでの研究では到達しえない研究組織全体としてのイギリス中・近世史資料に関する知見の拡大を得ることができた。また、毎年度3名がイギリスに出張し、史資料の調査・収集および学会ないし研究会における研究成果の発表あるいはイギリス在住研究者との意見交換等を通して、研究の深化を図ることができた。

著者

井内 太郎

出版者

広島史学研究会

雑誌

史学研究 (ISSN:03869342)

巻号頁・発行日

no.194, pp.p48-70, 1991-09

---

In the royal financial administration of medieval England, the Exchequer functioned as the main department. The system of assignment was one of the important ways to receipt and issue the money which was used in the Exchequer from mid-14th century to mid-17th century.In former studies, the role of this system has been underestimated. It has been said that this system was the obstacle of the financial administration of the Exchequer, and it was one of the reasons why the Exchequer was on the decline from Lancasterian period to mid-Tudor period. The purpose of this article is to re-examin this estimation of this system. The authours's argument is as follows;(1) The function of this system is devided into four types. The function was very defferent by each period, espicially changed at York and Cromwellian period.(2) Through this system, the Exchequer continued to function as the main department with the king's Chamber in the financial system.(3) As the result, the development of this system gave the opportunity to reform the accounting system of the Exchequer to the efficient one. The Exchequer, therefore, is not always unchaned nor conservative.The conclusion is that the Exchequer functioned as the main department in the financial system with the Chamber even in York and early Tudor period through the system of assignment. The second is it was recovering the size of the revenue enough to be the main department and efficiently changing the accounting system by the reform of 1554. Therefore, the Exchequer was not always unchanged nor conversative.

著者

井内 太郎

出版者

広島大学

雑誌

広島大学大学院文学研究科論集 (ISSN:13477013)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.61, pp.73-90, 2001-12-28

---

In March of 1996, the symposium was held in the Institute of Historical Research of London University. The theme of this symposium was 'Eltonian legacy'. G.R.Elton was the authority of the study of Tudor dynasty who died in 1994. His famous book was Tudor Revolution in Government (Cambridge, 1953) in which he emphasized on the radical change of the administration in 1530's and tbe important role of T.Cromwell in this change. Since then, there had been the controversy of his theory. One of the purposes in the symposium was to locate his study in the history of British historical study. What was the Eltonian legacy? In this article, I'll examine the Eltonian legacy on the basis of the argument of this symposium and the recent study of Tudor dynasty in the view of the history of administration, parliament, politics. The conclusion is as follows ; We can't accept his theory as it is, which is the objection to be critisized. But the attractive point of his argument is the sharp critical mind and new point of view. His capacity to examine materials is the point in which he should be appraised, too. One of the subjects for further study of Tudor dynasty is to relate his study of the central government with the new study of local government to define the state formation in early modern England.