3 0 0 0 OA 法命題の正当化と根元的規約主義—市場への法規制を素材にして—
- 著者
- 山田 八千子
- 出版者
- 日本法哲学会
- 雑誌
- 法哲学年報 (ISSN:03872890)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.2001, pp.114-123, 2002-10-30 (Released:2008-11-17)
- 参考文献数
- 19
- 著者
- 山田 八千子
- 出版者
- 日本評論社
- 雑誌
- 法学セミナー (ISSN:04393295)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.59, no.5, 2014-05
1 0 0 0 OA 法曹養成・法科大学院・法哲学教育
- 著者
- 山田 八千子
- 出版者
- 日本法哲学会
- 雑誌
- 法哲学年報 (ISSN:03872890)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.2006, pp.84-99,265, 2007-10-30 (Released:2010-12-16)
- 参考文献数
- 26
New legal training system was established at 2004. It organically connects legal education, the national bar examination and legal training as a “process”. Law school system would be its core. Law schools have to provide the education especially for training for the legal professions (judges, prosecutors, and lawyers). Therefore the education at law school should build a bridge between theoretical education and practical education. This paper would examine that the subject of legal philosophy plays an crucial role in such new legal training system. Legal education would be classified into two categories. These categories are the rationalistic theoretical education and the apprentice education as apprenticeship. In Japan the undergraduate schools and the postgraduate schools have given great deal of weight to the rationalistic theoretical education. But not only the theoretical education but also the apprentice education are indispensable for the education for legal professions.
1 0 0 0 OA 私法におけるリバタリアニズムの自由の構造 契約法理論を中心にして
- 著者
- 山田 八千子
- 出版者
- 日本法哲学会
- 雑誌
- 法哲学年報 (ISSN:03872890)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.2004, pp.88-104,202, 2005-09-30 (Released:2008-11-17)
- 参考文献数
- 19
In this paper I presuppose that liberty has a structure. Such structure of liberty also exits in private law. I would especially deal with some issues of contract law. Contract law is the core in libertarian legal theory. That is a reason why I focus on contract law. Libertarians respect the principle of freedom of contract. This is one of main principles of so called “classical private theory” or classical contract theory. By contrast, modern contract law is based on Welfarism which is criticized by libertarian in general. If modern contract theory is in harmony with Welfarism, it seems that libertarianism contributes not to these field of modern contract law theory. But I believe that it is a misunderstanding about libertarianism. We should explore practical implication of libertarianism for modern contract law. I argue that libertarianism provide useful suggestions for resolving a number of problems that modern contract law theory have to cope with. Firstly I indicate a number of dilemmas in modern contract law as follows. Although in modern contract law “consent by parties” would be often regulated for weaker parties, such regulations are not necessary produce the desired result. This is the point of libertarian argument. For instance, I refer to an example with regard to a relation between landlord and tenant in Land and House Lease Law in Japan. Secondly I explain libertarian arguments about “the nature of market order” and “the knowledge of the circumstance in market”. Indeed there are substantial differences in knowledge between consumer and company. But such differences are not necessary good reason to intervene to market. According to libertarian argument, market order is one of spontaneous order. So the knowledge never exists in concentrated, integrated form. If we wish to make good use of such knowledge in market, we have to take seriously the libertarian theory.
1 0 0 0 OA 契約違反と受約者の権利(序論)
- 著者
- 山田 八千子
- 出版者
- 日本法哲学会
- 雑誌
- 法哲学年報 (ISSN:03872890)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.1992, pp.191-199, 1993-10-30 (Released:2008-11-17)
- 参考文献数
- 8
1 0 0 0 OA 法と経済学の法哲学的総合研究
本研究では、法と経済学に関して、法哲学を基軸としつつ経済哲学的・実定法学的な視点も導入した学際的視座から、総合的かつ多角的な考察を実施した。(1)学問方法については、効率性・正義等の基本概念の分析、経済学的法観念と法学的法観念の比較検討、経済学的人間モデルの吟味、法解釈学の射程の論定、厚生経済学の批判的精査を、(2)学問対象については、経済学的研究が従来未開拓だった公的扶助、学校教育、民事訴訟での立証責任分配に関する分析を行った。