6 0 0 0 OA 制度のなかで生きるとはどのような経験か—公共的正当化論の再考に向けて—
- 著者
- 那須 耕介
- 出版者
- 日本法哲学会
- 雑誌
- 法哲学年報 (ISSN:03872890)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.2000, pp.164-172, 2001-10-30 (Released:2008-11-17)
- 参考文献数
- 9
2 0 0 0 OA [論説] リバタリアン・パターナリズムとその10年
- 著者
- 那須 耕介
- 出版者
- 京都大学大学院人間・環境学研究科 社会システム研究刊行会
- 雑誌
- 社会システム研究 (ISSN:13434497)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.19, pp.1-35, 2016-03-28
- 著者
- 那須 耕介
- 出版者
- 日本法哲学会
- 雑誌
- 法哲学年報 (ISSN:03872890)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.1996, pp.197-206, 1997-10-30 (Released:2008-11-17)
- 参考文献数
- 6
1 0 0 0 OA 遵法責務論への道
- 著者
- 那須 耕介
- 出版者
- 日本法哲学会
- 雑誌
- 法哲学年報 (ISSN:03872890)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.2008, pp.190-197, 2009 (Released:2021-12-29)
For the theory of the duty to obey the law. its introductory discussion is as important as its main discussion. In order to bring out the importance and role of theory of the duty to obey the law. we cannot avoid examining its practical significance as well as its theoretical specificity. Here I propose to focus not only on the traditional problem of 'evil law' but also on the problem of 'doubtful law'. Each provides the means to overcome the skepticism about the importance (or, theoretical specificity) of the theory of the duty to obey the law. The former, 'evil law' approach have pointed out that the concept of law's content-independent morality - legality, or L. L. Fuller's 'inner morality of law' - is the key to establish the general duty to obey the law. Besides, the latter, 'doubtful law' approach opens up the perspectives to a new domain of inquiry on the conditions of subjects who are expected to obey and respect their law that is, the conditions of citizenship or law-abiding morality.
1 0 0 0 IR リバタリアン・パターナリズムとその10年
- 著者
- 那須 耕介
- 出版者
- 京都大学大学院人間・環境学研究科 社会システム研究刊行会
- 雑誌
- 社会システム研究 (ISSN:13434497)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- no.19, pp.1-35, 2016-03
1 0 0 0 OA 非法律家にとっての法学学習の意味について 「法学部無用論」の手前で
- 著者
- 那須 耕介
- 出版者
- 日本法哲学会
- 雑誌
- 法哲学年報 (ISSN:03872890)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.2006, pp.57-75,266, 2007-10-30 (Released:2010-12-16)
- 参考文献数
- 21
With the recent establishment of law school in Japan, the social role of legal education at the university is now becoming our focus of attention. As often pointed out, the legal education at the Faculty of Law has suffered by its serious contradictions and blindness. Especially, although most students do not choose to become lawyer, both method and content of education has been designed without proper consideration of their needs. Now that the locus of lawyer training is moved to the law schools, the serious doubt turned to the raison d'_??_tre of the Faculty of Law will not be able to be removed, as far as this state continues. After pointing out that the current state of legal education in Japan owes much to the particular circumstances of many late-started modernization countries (including Japan), this report proposes a new task that should be borne so that Faculty of Law may continue next future. My main point is that bringing up the mediator who fills the gap between lawyers (the specialist) and citizens (the nonspecialists) might be a new role of the Faculty of Law. These jobs are supposed to function as translators, critics or commentators who understand and evaluates the way of thinking and acting of legal specialists. If the faculty of law should live through current impasse, it has to upgrade its educational program so as to develop the cultural foundation of the rule of law.
1 0 0 0 OA 法の支配を支えるもの
1 0 0 0 OA 法と経済学の法哲学的総合研究
本研究では、法と経済学に関して、法哲学を基軸としつつ経済哲学的・実定法学的な視点も導入した学際的視座から、総合的かつ多角的な考察を実施した。(1)学問方法については、効率性・正義等の基本概念の分析、経済学的法観念と法学的法観念の比較検討、経済学的人間モデルの吟味、法解釈学の射程の論定、厚生経済学の批判的精査を、(2)学問対象については、経済学的研究が従来未開拓だった公的扶助、学校教育、民事訴訟での立証責任分配に関する分析を行った。