著者

日本女子大学漫画研究会 [編]

出版者

日本女子大学漫画研究会

巻号頁・発行日

1976

著者

日本女子大学校家政学部 編

出版者

桜楓会出版部

巻号頁・発行日

1938

著者

日本女子大学校家政館 編

出版者

大倉書店

巻号頁・発行日

1920

著者

日本女子大学校 編

出版者

日本女子大学校

巻号頁・発行日

1942

著者

日本女子大学紀要 文学部

出版者

日本女子大学

雑誌

日本女子大学紀要 文学部 (ISSN:02883031)

巻号頁・発行日

no.66, pp.1, 2017-03-20

著者

日本女子大学校桜楓会 編

出版者

桜楓会出版部

巻号頁・発行日

1907

著者

日本女子大学文学部日本文学科編

出版者

クレス出版

巻号頁・発行日

2012

著者

村角 洋子 Yoko MURAZUMI 日本女子大学付属高校 Junior High School attached to Tsukuba University and Senior High School attached to Japan Womens Unrversrty

出版者

大学英語教育学会

雑誌

大学英語教育学会紀要 = JACET bulletin (ISSN:02858673)

巻号頁・発行日

no.12, pp.47-62, 1981-11-15

---

The motion verbs "come" and "go" have been given explanations in both deictic and empathetic trameworks of research. However, when we look at the uses of these two verbs in greater detail, we find that these explanations are not complete. In this paper I have tried to find the most appropriate and available explanation that can account for every kind of use. First of all, we examine the deictic analysis of these verbs done by Fillmore arld deai with several problems in this analysis. Secondly, we compare the concepts of empathy and deixis. By deixis, we found that languages are produced by a very speaker-centered or egocentric point of view. By empathy, we found that language permits partial access to other people's inner states through linguistic communication and that information available through language compensates for the impossibility of directly experiencing the other person's point of view.

著者

佐藤 全 松澤 杏 Akira SATO Kyou MATSUZAWA 日本女子大学 日本女子大学附属豊明小学校 Japan Women's University Houmei Elementary School attached to Japan Women's University

出版者

東洋館

雑誌

教育社会学研究 = The journal of educational sociology (ISSN:03873145)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.72, pp.95-105, 2003-05-25

---

In Japan, municipal boards of education evaluate public school teachers, who are local public servants, under plans set by the prefectural boards of education. All of the prefectural boards of education enacted this teacher evaluation system about 45 years ago, but in 2000 Tokyo abolished this system (System I) and adopted a new performance appraisal system (System II). This paper aimed to extract the characteristic and the problem by examining each policy process about System I and System II. For the categorization of the policy process, two models are adopted from the results of research by Michio Muramatsu. One is the vertical administrative management model, followed by unitary influence. The other is the horizontal political competing model, followed by multi influence. The following conclusions were obtained. It is the common feature seen in System I and System II that original motive was not from only educational matters and the prefectural board of education did not accomplish the policy making duty due to the educational bureaucrat including the superintendent. It can be confirmed that the teacher evaluation policy is shifting from the vertical administrative management model to the horizontal political competing model. It was found during the decision process of System II that an administrative staff exercised individual influence power without being buried in bureaucracy. The teacher policy of the prefectural board of education starts on a new evaluation policy though the policy assessment of a present evaluation system is not passed. It is necessary to evaluate the teacher evaluation policy from the viewpoint of offering suitable and good quality teaching to the student.