著者

明仁親王 目黒 勝介

出版者

The Ichthyological Society of Japan

雑誌

魚類学雑誌 (ISSN:00215090)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.22, no.3, pp.127-142, 1975-12-29 (Released:2010-06-28)

参考文献数

28

---

フタゴハゼGlossogobius giuris (Hamilton) と見なされていたウロハゼ属の1型は新種と認められたのでG.aureus (新称: コンジキハゼ) として記載した.本種の最も重要な特徴は孔器の配列にある.ウロハゼ属の他の種と比較し, その特徴を明らかにした.

著者

明仁親王 目黒 勝介

出版者

The Ichthyological Society of Japan

雑誌

魚類学雑誌 (ISSN:00215090)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.27, no.3, pp.215-236, 1980-11-30 (Released:2011-07-04)

参考文献数

39

---

Six species of the genus Bathygobius collected in Japan were compared with each other and with the type specimens of nominal species considered as synonyms of three species of the genus Bathygobius: B.petrophilus, B.scapulopunctatus, and B.fuscus listed by Koumans (1953).The genus Bathygobius has the following combination of characters: a protuberance below the anterior nostril bordered by a groove containing pit organ line 6 on the upper side and by a groove containing pit organ line 7 on the posterior side, a median longitudinal groove containing pit organ line 10, which runs from the anterior margin of the cheek and divides into two posteriorly, the trapeziform mental flap bordered by a groove containing pit organ line 13 on the lateral side and by a groove containing pit organ line 14 on the posterior side, and free branched rays on the upper part of the pectoral fin.Six species of the genus Bathygobius were found in Japan, i.e., B. fuscus, B.padangensis, B.cocosensis, B.petrophilus, B.cyclopterus, and B.cotticeps.The differences between B.fuscus and B.padangensis are the least among the six species.Clearcut differences between them are only in the number of free branched rays on the pectoral fin and in coloration, although there are some specific differences in the number of pectoral fin rays and the angle between the lower and posterior axes of the first pterygiophore of the first dorsal fin. The number of differences between B.padangensis and B. cocosensis and between B.fuscus and B.cocosensis are only slightly greater. Although more differences are found between B.cyclopterus and B. cotticeps than those among the three species mentioned above, both of them have many common characteristics, some of which are specialized and are only found in these two species.Based on the number of common and distinctive characteristics, the six species are divided into three types: B.fuscus, B.padangensis, and B.cocosensis; B.petrophilus; B.cyclopterus and B.cotticeps.B.fuscus, B.padangensis, B.cocosensis, B.cyclopterus, and B.cotticeps are found in the tidal zone of rocky beaches, while B.petrophilus is collected near shore on substrates of sand or mixed mud and sand. B.fuscus, B.padangensis, and B.cocosensis are collected north of 35°N, but specimens of B.padangensis and B.cocosensis collected in the northern area of their range are extremely small in number compared with those of B.fuscus.B.petrophilus is collected between 33° and 35°N in Japan, but as the type specimens of Gobius petrophilus and Gobius villosus were collected in Indonesia, it is conjectured that B.petrophilus inhabits southern Japan south of 33°N.The examination of the type specimens revealed that Gobius poecilichthys should be synonymized with B.fuscus which is different from Mapo fuscus sensu Jordan, Tanaka and Snyder (1913).M. fuscus sensu Jordan, Tanaka and Snyder is presumed to be synonymous with B.padangensis from the description of M.fuscus sensu Snyder (1912a) from Tanegashima, in which the difference between M.fuscus and Mapo poecilichthys was recorded, and from the specimens of M. fuscus sensu Snyder (1912b) from Naha.Bathygobius sp.reported by Arai and Ida (1975), Zama and Fujita (1977), Hayashi and Itoh (1978) was identified as B.cocosensis on the basis of comparison with three specimens of that species (RMNH 4533) collected and identified by Bleeker.

著者

明仁親王 目黒 勝介

出版者

The Ichthyological Society of Japan

雑誌

魚類学雑誌 (ISSN:00215090)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.24, no.2, pp.113-127, 1977-09-15 (Released:2011-07-04)

参考文献数

31

---

Callogobius sclateri (Steindachner) is newly recorded from Japan;Callogobius moroanus (Seale) is synonymized with Callogobius hasseltii (Bleeker) and Callogobius snyderi (Fowler) is synonymized with Callogobius okinawae (Snyder), after comparison with the types.Therefore the species of Callogobius found in Japan are five species: C.snelliusi Koumans, C.sclateri, C.hasseltii, C.okinawae and C.tanegasimae (Snyder).

著者

明仁親王

出版者

The Ichthyological Society of Japan

雑誌

魚類学雑誌 (ISSN:00215090)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.11, no.1-2, pp.1-26, 1963-12-15 (Released:2010-06-28)

参考文献数

10

---

1. 肩胛骨の有無, 形態をハゼ科魚類67種についてアリザリン染色によって調べた。これらは次のように分類された。有肩胛骨型47種肩胛骨はよく発達し背方から肩胛骨孔をかこんで二叉するが, 完全に孔をとりかこむものはない。射出骨のうすく染まる体長の小さい時期から肩胛骨は染色点或は棒として現われる。特殊型2種有肩胛骨型より肩胛骨の発達の不十分な型で無肩胛骨型との中間に位する。射出骨の十分に染まった体長の大きな個体でも染色されないものがあり, 又肩胛骨のある場合でも二叉はしないように思われる。無肩胛骨型18種肩胛骨を欠く型である。シロウオを除き射出骨, 烏喙骨の骨化は他の型と変りがない。2. 肩胛骨の形は個体変異が著しく, 種の特徴として重要視することはむずかしいが, 肩胛骨の有無は十分に成熟した個体では特殊型を除き種によって決まっており, 種を区別するには安定した一形質とみなされる。3. 肩胛骨の有無は属を区別する一つの特徴として取り上げ得ると考えられる。

著者

明仁親王 目黒 勝介

出版者

The Ichthyological Society of Japan

雑誌

魚類学雑誌 (ISSN:18847374)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.34, no.4, pp.409-420, 1988

---

ロクラハゼ属の2種キマダラハゼ<I>Astrabe flavima-culata</I>とシマシロクラハゼ<I>A. fasciata</I>を新種として記載し, シロクラハゼ属の模式種であり, 今まで知られていた唯一の種であるシロクラハゼ<I>A. lactisella</I>についても前2種と比較して再記載した.キマダラハゼは日本産魚類大図鑑の中でキマダラハゼ<I>Astrabe sp</I>.として明仁親王 (1984) が解説を付したものである.キマダラハゼはシロクラハゼとは眼の上縁にある皮摺の上後部が突出しないこと, 縦列鱗数が少ないこと, 第1背鰭前方と腹部に鱗があること, 胸鰭基部を通る白色横帯の幅が狭いこと, 生時には胸鰭基部を通る白色横帯を除き, 暗褐色地に黄色模様が見られることによって区別される.シマシロクラハゼはシロクラハゼとは横列鱗数が少ないこと, 体側の鱗のある部分の幅が狭いこと, 胸鰭基部を通る白色横帯の幅が狭いこと, 第1背鰭前部から体の腹側に向かう白色横帯があることによって区別される.この度の標本の調査により, Snyder (1912) が記録した種子島産の<I>A. lactisella</I>はキマダラハゼであり, 本間・田村 (1972) が記録した佐渡島達者産のシロクラハゼはシマシロクラハゼであることが判明したので, これらの標本はそれぞれの種の副模式標本とした.また道津.塩垣 (1971) がシロクラハゼとして扱ったものの中, 標本を調べることが出来た鹿児島県馬毛島産のものはキマダラハゼであった.長崎県野母崎産の標本は図から判断するとシマシロクラハゼと考えられる.明仁親王 (1984) のシロクラハゼとキマダラハゼの解説は訂正しなければならない.

著者

明仁親王

出版者

The Ichthyological Society of Japan

雑誌

魚類学雑誌 (ISSN:00215090)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.18, no.2, pp.57-64, 1971-09-15 (Released:2010-06-28)

参考文献数

5

---

Among the 109 species of gobiids listed at the end, the supratemporals were found in six species: five out of sixteen species in Group 1 and one species in Group 3 (Table 1).No supratemporal was found in Group 2 and Group 4 (for the characteristics of the four groups, see Prince Akihito, 1969). These bones were found between the sensory canal groove of the pterotic and the post-temporal (Fig.1).These species had a continuous sensory canal from the anterior tip of the head to the area of the supratemporals and the supratemporal canal.The supratemporals consisted of three pieces, anterior, median, and posterior, which I named without particular consideration for the homology of Tominaga's (1968: 59) anterior and posterior supratemporals on the Pempheridae.They were all separated in three species, Oxyeleotris marmorata (Figs.1.A and 2.A), Bostrichthys sinensis (Fig.2.C), and Ophiocara porocephala (Fig.2.D), and each piece usually had one nerve foramen.In two species of the genus Butis, B.butis (Fig.2.E, F) and B. gymnopoma (Fig.2.G), the median and posterior supratemporals were fused. In Xenisthmus clarus (Figs.1.B and 2.H) the anterior and median supratemporals were fused.The fused bone had two nerve foramina.Wide individual variations were observed in the shape, including loss of a bone (Fig.2.B), separation of a fused bone, loss of a nerve foramen, or an additional foramen on the upper lateral side.The presence or absence of supratemporals was dependent on the presence or absence of the sensory canal on that part, except in the cases of Bathygobius petrophilus and Syciopterus japonicus (both belonging to Group 4) which had a continuous sensory canal but no supratemporal canal. Although the presence or absence of sensory canals was sometimes inconsistent, it seems that the systematic value of the supratemporal is signifcant, considering that the most unspecialized Oxyeleotris marmorata and Bostrichthys sinensis (which are the only species having a suborbital) have the most complete sensory canal systems with three supratemporals.

著者

明仁親王

出版者

文芸春秋

雑誌

文芸春秋

巻号頁・発行日

vol.77, no.10, pp.107-114, 1999-10

著者

明仁親王 目黒 勝介

出版者

The Ichthyological Society of Japan

雑誌

魚類学雑誌 (ISSN:00215090)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.22, no.2, pp.63-67, 1975-12-15 (Released:2010-06-28)

参考文献数

8

---

ゴマハゼPandaka lidwilliに類似する小型のハゼの新種Pandaka trimaculataを記載し, ミツボシゴマハゼの和名を附した.本種は沖縄県石垣島と西表島およびフィリピンのミンダナオ島で採集された.ミツボシゴマハゼとゴマハゼの相違は縦列鱗数と腹部の斑紋にある.ゴマハゼの属名として用いられたBerowraはPandaka属との類似のため, Pandaka属のシノニムとした.

著者

明仁親王

出版者

The Ichthyological Society of Japan

雑誌

魚類学雑誌 (ISSN:00215090)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.13, no.4-6, pp.73-101, 1966-07-31 (Released:2011-07-04)

参考文献数

49

---

1. ウロハゼとフタゴハゼGlossogobius giuris (HAMILTON) は同一種と認める人と, 異種或は異亜種として区別する人があるので, この両者の比較を試み, いくつかの違いを見いだした。2. ウロハゼとフタゴハゼGlossogocius giuris (HAMILTON) は形態上および分布上から考慮して別種とするのが妥当である。3. ウロハゼの学名には従来brunneusが日本では用いられて来たが, 高木 (1962) によってbrunneusはヨシノボリに用いるべきであることが明らかにされたので, 新たに学名を求める必要が生じた。そこでウロハゼの学名Gobius olivaceus TEMMINCK & SCHLEGELとGobius fasciato-punctatus RICHARDSONの発表年月日を調べ, Gobius olivaceusに先取権があることを見いだした。4. ウロハゼの学名はGlossogobius olivoceus (TEMMINCK & SCHKEGEL) が妥当であると考える。

著者

明仁親王 目黒 勝介

出版者

日本魚類学会

雑誌

魚類学雑誌 (ISSN:00215090)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.26, no.2, pp.p192-202, 1979-09

被引用文献数

1

著者

明仁親王 目黒 勝介

出版者

The Ichthyological Society of Japan

雑誌

魚類学雑誌 (ISSN:00215090)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.21, no.2, pp.72-84, 1974-11-30 (Released:2011-07-04)

参考文献数

18

---

Ophieleotris aporos was originally described by Bleeker (1854: 59) as Eleotris aporos.After Gill (1863: 270) established the genus Ophiocara based on Eleotris ophicephalusValenciennes, a synonym of Ophiocara porocephala (Valenciennes), E.aporos wasassigned to the genus Ophiocara by Bleeker (1877: 27).Aurich (1938: 132) established a new genus Ophieleotris for O.aporos based on the study of sensory canal pores, arrangement of pit organs and other characteristics. However, his genus has not been used by others but Whitley (1964: 55), as far as it is known to us.Our study on comparative morphology on O.porocephala and O.aporos with other species, listed on p.74, has revealed further different characteristics between two species and other species, some of which can be used for separating O.aporos from the genus Ophiocara and for recognizing the genus Ophieleotris for O.aporos.The characteristics of the two species are listed in Table 1.The most importantcharacteristics of the two genera, Ophiocara and Ophieleotris, in comparison with othergenera listed on p.74 are: 1) The presence of a process on the inner side of themaxillary in Ophiocara (Fig.1A) and the absence in Ophieleotris (Fig.1B).2) Thepresence of oculoscapular canal from nasal to posttemporal with the pores A to Lexcept for G, of preopercular canal with the pores M to Q and three supratemporalsin Ophiocara (Fig.2A);the absence of oculoscapular canal and supratemporals andthe presence of short preopercular canal with the pores N'and O'in Ophieleotris (Fig.2B). 3) 17 segmented caudal fin rays in Ophiocara and 15 segmented caudal finrays in Ophieleotris.4) 26 (or rarely 27) vertebrae and the first and second pterygiophoresof the first dorsal fin are inserted between the third and fourth vertebrae in Ophiocara (Fig.3A);25 vertebrae and the first pterygiophore between the third and fourthvertebrae (Fig.3B) or the first two or three pterygiophores between the fourth andfifth vertebrae in Ophieleotris (Fig.3C).5) The presence of a short, low longitudinalridge on frontal in Ophieleotris (Fig.4A);the absence of the ridge in Ophiocara (Fig.4B).6) The size of a scale of interorbital space of Ophiocara smaller than thatof caudal peduncle;the size of a scale of interorbital space of Ophieleotris larger thanthat of caudal peduncle and the largest of all the genera;the size of a scale of caudalpeduncle of both genera is not different.Although O. porocephala has no suborbitalwhose presence is thought to be an unspecialized characteristic, it has common characteristicsin 1) to 4) with the species with a suborbital, except for the loss of thepore G.Thus O.porocephala closely resembles the species with a suborbital whichare thought to be the most unspecialized species. As for O.aporos, when compared with them, it has no characteristics which are as unspecialized as those found in O.porocephala.

著者

明仁親王 目黒 勝介

出版者

The Ichthyological Society of Japan

雑誌

魚類学雑誌 (ISSN:00215090)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.34, no.4, pp.409-420, 1988-02-25 (Released:2011-02-23)

参考文献数

6

---

ロクラハゼ属の2種キマダラハゼAstrabe flavima-culataとシマシロクラハゼA. fasciataを新種として記載し, シロクラハゼ属の模式種であり, 今まで知られていた唯一の種であるシロクラハゼA. lactisellaについても前2種と比較して再記載した.キマダラハゼは日本産魚類大図鑑の中でキマダラハゼAstrabe sp.として明仁親王 (1984) が解説を付したものである.キマダラハゼはシロクラハゼとは眼の上縁にある皮摺の上後部が突出しないこと, 縦列鱗数が少ないこと, 第1背鰭前方と腹部に鱗があること, 胸鰭基部を通る白色横帯の幅が狭いこと, 生時には胸鰭基部を通る白色横帯を除き, 暗褐色地に黄色模様が見られることによって区別される.シマシロクラハゼはシロクラハゼとは横列鱗数が少ないこと, 体側の鱗のある部分の幅が狭いこと, 胸鰭基部を通る白色横帯の幅が狭いこと, 第1背鰭前部から体の腹側に向かう白色横帯があることによって区別される.この度の標本の調査により, Snyder (1912) が記録した種子島産のA. lactisellaはキマダラハゼであり, 本間・田村 (1972) が記録した佐渡島達者産のシロクラハゼはシマシロクラハゼであることが判明したので, これらの標本はそれぞれの種の副模式標本とした.また道津.塩垣 (1971) がシロクラハゼとして扱ったものの中, 標本を調べることが出来た鹿児島県馬毛島産のものはキマダラハゼであった.長崎県野母崎産の標本は図から判断するとシマシロクラハゼと考えられる.明仁親王 (1984) のシロクラハゼとキマダラハゼの解説は訂正しなければならない.

著者

明仁親王

出版者

日本魚類学会

雑誌

魚類学雑誌 (ISSN:00215090)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.16, no.3, pp.93-114, 1969-12-20 (Released:2010-06-28)

参考文献数

34

---

In order to establish a firmer classification of gobies, certain characters (listed in the title) were examined.The gobies studied were arranged in four groups on the basis of three featurs (Table2), namely, the presence or absence of the mesopterygoid and of the upper postcleithrum, and the number of branchiostegals.These characters were thought to be more reliable than the other four that were investigated-namely, the pelvic fins, scapula, lower postcleithrum, and suborbitals-because of individual variations in the latter at the intraspecific level and interspecific variations among related species.The characters of the four groups are shown in table2.Group 1 is thought to be the least specialized, because of minimal reduction of bones and the completely separated pelvic fins with a spine and five branched soft rays (except Percottus glehni).In many of the included species the enclosing scapula type, and in two of them a suborbital, were present.Groups 2 and 3 are intermediate between groups 1 and 4 from the point of view of these characters.Group 4 is regarded as the most specialized because of the greatest loss of bones.None of the members of this group (except one among threespecimens of Eleotriodes longipinnis and one among sixteen specimens of E.strigatus) displayed completely separated pelvic fins with five branched soft rays, and none had the enclosing scapula.Instead, the membrane uniting the pelvic fins, the pelvic frenum, fewer pelvic soft rays, and the blotched scapula or no scapula were found.Although group 4 seems capable of being divided, it is left undivided in this study because of the characters used.Owing to the limited number of species and characters examined here it is impossible to know more than that these four groups show four levels of specialization.

著者

明仁親王 目黒 勝介

出版者

日本魚類学会

雑誌

魚類学雑誌 (ISSN:00215090)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.27, no.3, pp.p215-236, 1980-11

著者

明仁親王

雑誌

魚類学雑誌

巻号頁・発行日

vol.14, pp.167-182, 1967

被引用文献数

1