著者

西村 賀子 桜井 万里子 和泉 ちえ 森谷 公俊 樋笠 勝士 後藤 篤子 北野 雅弘

出版者

日本西洋古典学会

雑誌

西洋古典学研究 (ISSN:04479114)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.67, pp.63-106, 2019 (Released:2022-03-08)

著者

シクロス ディオドロス 森谷 公俊

出版者

帝京大学文学部史学科

雑誌

帝京史学 (ISSN:09114645)

巻号頁・発行日

no.31, pp.29-165, 2016-02

著者

森谷 公俊 鈴木 革

出版者

帝京大学

雑誌

基盤研究(C)

巻号頁・発行日

2016-04-01

---

紀元前329年から326年までのアレクサンドロス大王遠征路の実地調査を行った。ウズベキスタン(古代ソグディアナ)では、アムダリヤ川の渡河点および正妃ロクサネの故郷とされるクズルテパ遺跡を調査した。最大の課題は地元住民が立てこもった3つの岩砦の特定であったが、現地の状況により登山は不可能で、完全な実証には至らなかった。パキスタン(古代インド)では北西辺境州において、スワート地方の住民が立てこもったピールサル(古代アオルノス)へ2度の日帰り登山を行い、現場を精査して戦闘状況を復元できた。またインダス川下りの行程を可能な限りたどった。大王の遠征地域がいかに豊かな多様性を持っていたかが認識できた。

著者

森谷 公俊

出版者

帝京大学文学部史学科

雑誌

帝京史学 (ISSN:09114645)

巻号頁・発行日

no.27, pp.257-318, 2012-02

著者

森谷 公俊

出版者

日本西洋史学会

雑誌

西洋史学 (ISSN:03869253)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.252, pp.34, 2013 (Released:2022-04-28)

著者

森谷 公俊

出版者

公益財団法人史学会

雑誌

史學雜誌 (ISSN:00182478)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.104, no.6, pp.1094-1114, 1209-1208, 1995-06-20

---

The Thessalian Confederacy played an important role in the course of the conquest of Greece by Philip II. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relation between the Third Sacred War and Philip's invasion in the context of Thessalian history. At the time of the outbreak of the Sacred War in 356 B.C., we find no conflict within the Thessalians, but the next year, tyranny was revived in Pherai and set to recover the rule of Thessaly, in alliance with Phocis, who had occupied Delphi and provoked the Sacred War. In oppositon to them, the Thessalians urged Philip to support them, which forced him to concern himself directly with the Sacred War. In 354 B.C., the allied forces of Phocis and Pherai defeated the Thessalians and the Macedonians, and gained superiority in Thessaly. Then, at least three polis stood for Pherai. In 353 B.C., Philip marched south again. In the Crocus Plain, the Macedonian and the Thessalian army enjoyed a great victory over the Phocians and the Pheraians. Philip banished the tyrants from Pherai and recovered the unification of the Thessalian Confederacy. During the same year, the Thessalians appointed Philip as archon of the Confederacy for life. It was the Aleuadai, the great aristocrats of Larissa, who proposed this appointment. They had had friendly relations with the Macedonian royal house since the fifth century, but it was unprecedented for a Greek state to entrust their supreme power to a foreign king. Why did this occur ? In the first place, the Aleuadai aimed at exterminating the Pheraian tyranny and unifying Thessaly under their hegemony. Because they have not been able to control the Pheraian tyranny by themselves since c.400 B.C., they decided to rely on Philip, even if it meant that they had to be content with the position of an ally subordinate to Philip. Secondly, the offensive of Pherai and Phocis in 354 B.C. was so critical to the unification of Thessaly that the Thessalians welcomed Philip as a liberator of the confederacy. Thirdly, there was a profound suspicion among the Thessalian cities. The Aleuadai chose to give the office of archon to Philip, who was a reliable ally rather than to share it with the other cities. Finally, Philip was not a mere foreigner to the Aleuadai, because they and the Macedonian royal house alleged that the Heracleidai were their common ancestors. On the other hand, Thessaly was extremely valuable to Philip both in securing the south frontier of his kingdom and in its abundant resources. Now Philip 'legitimately' gained it. In the end, the complicated situation of Thessalian politics, connected with the course of the Third Sacred War, opened the way to Philip' invasion of the south.

著者

森谷 公俊 Moritani Kimitoshi

出版者

帝京大学文学部史学科

雑誌

帝京史学 (ISSN:09114645)

巻号頁・発行日

no.29, pp.237-282, 2014-02

著者

森谷 公俊

出版者

帝京大学文学部史学科

雑誌

帝京史学 (ISSN:09114645)

巻号頁・発行日

no.29, pp.237-282, 2014-02

著者

森谷 公俊 MORITANI Kimitoshi

出版者

帝京大学文学部史学科

雑誌

帝京史学 (ISSN:09114645)

巻号頁・発行日

no.28, pp.221-315, 2013-02

著者

森谷 公俊

出版者

帝京大学文学部史学科

雑誌

帝京史学 (ISSN:09114645)

巻号頁・発行日

no.28, pp.221-315, 2013-02

著者

森谷 公俊

出版者

日本西洋史学会

雑誌

西洋史学 (ISSN:03869253)

巻号頁・発行日

no.252, pp.254-266, 2013

著者

森谷 公俊

出版者

ニュートンプレス

雑誌

Newton (ISSN:02860651)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.32, no.4, pp.80-89, 2012-04

著者

森谷 公俊

出版者

帝京大学文学部史学科

雑誌

帝京史学 (ISSN:09114645)

巻号頁・発行日

no.27, pp.257-318, 2012-02

著者

森谷 公俊

出版者

校倉書房

雑誌

歴史評論 (ISSN:03868907)

巻号頁・発行日

no.773, pp.104-108, 2014-09

著者

森谷 公俊

出版者

日本西洋古典学会

雑誌

西洋古典學研究 (ISSN:04479114)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.33, pp.40-48, 1985-03-29

---

The concepts of arche and hegemonia in Isocrates have the following features in the light of analysis conducted from a politico-historical perspective. In the first place, Isocrates attributed a highly moral and ethical value to the concept of hegemonia. In his Panegyricus, he claimed that Athens alone deserved the title of supreme leader of the Greeks because the city had been a benefactor of the Greeks and a protector of all those who had suffered. This claim never changed throughout his political discourses. Secondly, Isocrates located the essence of arche in sea-power which he criticized as bringing misfortune to Greece, and stressed the ethical superiority of land hegemony. He came to this conclusion in his On the Peace as a result of the downfall of Sparta after the battle of Leuctra and the defeat of Athens in the Social War. His position is in sharp contrast to that of Thucydides and Old Oligarch, who insisted on the superiority of Athens as a sea-power. In the third place, he considered the problem of constitutional reform in the light of his concept of hegemonia. He sought the model of the ideal constitution in the age of hegemonia of Athens and Sparta, and described it in contrast to the age of arche. The concepts of arche and hegemonia in Isocrates reflect the political situation of Greece in the middle of the fourth century when Sparta, Thebes and Athens fell one after the other, and differ from those of historians such as Herodotus, Thucydides and Xenophon.