文献一覧: 田上孝一 (著者)

29 0 0 0 OA マルクスの物象化論と廣松の物象化論(<特集>廣松物象化論と経済学)

著者: 田上孝一
出版者: 経済理論学会
雑誌: 季刊経済理論 (ISSN:18825184)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.48, no.2, pp.40-49, 2011-07-20 (Released:2017-04-25)

The aim of this paper is to compare Wataru Hiromatsu's theory of reification with Karl Marx's theory of reification. Hiromatsu insists that his theory is the genuine interpretation of Marx. So I examine Hiromatsu's remark. In this paper, I mainly concern the rightness of Hiromatsu's interpretation of Marx. I do not concern the validity of Hiromatsu's theory on the contemporary society. In section one, I doubt the Japanese translation of reification. In original German word, reification is Versachlichung. In ordinary Japanese translation, Versachlichung is "Butsushoka". Butsusho means phenomenal thing. Ka means transformation. So Butsushoka means something is transformed to phenomenal thing. But this meaning cannot tell the conceptual content of Versachlichung. The stem of Versachlichung is Sache. Sache is the counter word of Person. So Versachlicung means that Person is transformed to Sache, in English, personality is transformed to thing. It means not epistemological aspect but ontological situation. So Butsushoka is not correct. "Butsukenka" is correct. Because "butsuken" correctly means Sache. That is why I insist that Versachlichung should be translated into not Butsushoka but Butsukenka. In section two, I explain the core concept of Marx's theory of reification. The basic usage of reification by Marx is "reification of personality and personalization of thing". The conceptual dimension of reification in Marx's case is not epistemological but ontological. By the theory of reification Marx tries to clarify the real upside-down structure of capitalism. For Marx capitalism is the society in which labor's personality becomes a thing like goods. Capitalism is not slavery. But in fact, it is the wage-slave society. Marx charges this fact by the theory of reification. In short, for Marx reification is the essence of capitalism. Marx also charges the fetishism in capitalism. The concept of fetishism in Marx's case is expression of reification. It is also phenomenon of reification. The relationships of reification and fetishism are "cause and effect" and "essence and phenomenon". And reification is also alienation. It is one dimension of alienation. Marx insists that capitalist is arisen by alienated labor. The alienation of labor of workers from his/her own labor process is cause of capitalism. So alienation is cause of reification. That is why alienation and reification and fetishism are mutual "cause and effect" and "essence and phenomenon" relationships. In section three, I examine Hiromatsu's theory of reification. Hiromatsu tells about reification but he does not analyze Versachlichung. Only he analyses is not Versachlichung but Fetischismus. But fetishism is only a expression of reification. Owing to analyze fetishism we cannot clarify reification. Why has he this illusion? Because he thinks reification and fetishism as being the same. Through this reason he one-sidedly looks reification as epistemological concept. For Hiromatsu, reification as the real upside-down structure is "the vulgar reification". But Marx himself has this vulgar idea. Hiromatsu's reification is a very odd theory. Conclusion: Hiromatsu's theory of reification is a distortion of Marx's theory of reification. Hiromatsu himself thinks that his theory is the genuine interpretation of Marx. But in fact, Hiromatsu's theory has nothing to do with Marx. So Hiromatsu's theory of reification is not Marxist one but his own philosophical fantasy.

19 0 0 0 IR いわゆる「個人的所有の再建」について

著者: 田上孝一
出版者: 東京電機大学
雑誌: 東京電機大学総合文化研究 = Bulletin of Tokyo Denki University, arts and sciences (ISSN:1348799X)
巻号頁・発行日: no.16, pp.127-130, 2018

https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/120006635818

16 0 0 0 非常勤講師と研究 (特集非正規・不安定雇用と学問継承の危機)

著者: 田上孝一
出版者: 日本科学者会議 ; 1966-
雑誌: 日本の科学者 (ISSN:00290335)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.53, no.11, pp.612-617, 2018-11

2020-07-07 04:02:49
16 + 47 Twitter

https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/40021711043

8 0 0 0 初期マルクスの疎外論 : 疎外論超克説批判

著者: 田上孝一
出版者: 立正大学
巻号頁・発行日: 2000

博士論文

2023-04-15 12:36:02
8 + 26 Twitter

5 0 0 0 OA 『ゴータ綱領批判』におけるGenossenschaft概念について

著者: 田上孝一
雑誌: 東京電機大学総合文化研究 = Bulletin of Tokyo Denki University, Arts and Sciences (ISSN:1348799X)
巻号頁・発行日: no.14, pp.233-236, 2016-12-20

2018-07-01 16:00:51
5 + 0 Twitter

http://id.nii.ac.jp/1262/00000031/

5 0 0 0 マルクスの物象化論と廣松の物象化論(<特集>廣松物象化論と経済学)

著者: 田上孝一
出版者: 経済理論学会
雑誌: 季刊経済理論 (ISSN:18825184)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.48, no.2, pp.40-49, 2011

2017-03-04 14:07:10
5 + 13 Twitter

4 0 0 0 IR 初期マルクス研究の意義

著者: 田上孝一
出版者: 東京電機大学
雑誌: 東京電機大学総合文化研究 = Bulletin of Tokyo Denki University, arts and sciences (ISSN:1348799X)
巻号頁・発行日: no.17, pp.119-122, 2019

2021-03-09 20:33:49
4 + 9 Twitter

https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/120006847342

4 0 0 0 マルクスのプロレタリア独裁概念について

著者: 田上孝一
出版者: 東京電機大学
雑誌: 東京電機大学総合文化研究 (ISSN:1348799X)
巻号頁・発行日: no.13, pp.305-309, 2015-12

2020-05-06 14:28:11
4 + 14 Twitter

https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/40020784650

4 0 0 0 毛沢東の矛盾論について

著者: 田上孝一
出版者: 東京電機大学
雑誌: 東京電機大学総合文化研究 (ISSN:1348799X)
巻号頁・発行日: no.12, pp.251-255, 2014-12

2019-09-02 11:30:15
4 + 7 Twitter

https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/40020376097

3 0 0 0 自然の弁証法と弁証法の真正性

著者: Zivotic Miladin 田上孝一
出版者: 季報「唯物論研究」刊行会
雑誌: 季報唯物論研究 (ISSN:02852993)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.23, pp.132-144, 1999-08

https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/40004384149

2 0 0 0 コスモポリタニズムのアクチュアリティ

著者: 有賀誠松元雅和伊藤恭彦上原賢司施光恒田上孝一松井暁
出版者: 防衛大学校(総合教育学群、人文社会科学群、応用科学群、電気情報学群及びシステム工学群)
雑誌: 基盤研究(C)
巻号頁・発行日: 2021-04-01

現代世界は、不可避的にグローバル化が進む世界である。そうした流れの中で、国民国家という枠組みでは解くことのできない環境問題等の課題が数多く出現している。このとき注目されるのは、「コスモポリタニズム」という歴史ある思想である。本研究は、「コスモポリタニズム」を、現代的な課題に応答可能なものとしてアップデートすることを目指している。