著者
玉瀬 耕治 相原 和雄
出版者
奈良教育大学教育学部附属教育実践総合センター
雑誌
教育実践総合センター研究紀要 (ISSN:13476971)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.13, pp.23-31, 2004-03-31

According to Doi' s AMAE theory, it was predicted that there is some relationship between students' AMAE and Big-Five as personality traits. A new rating scale to assess the state of students' AMAE was developed on the basis of a previous study by Tamase and Wakimoto (2003). The AMAE scale consisted of 20 items, which constituted 4 subscales: AMAE-Desire, AMAE-Acceptance, AMAE-Contortion, and AMAERejection. The first two subscales were supposed to evaluate interdependent aspects of AMAE, whereas the last two subscales were supposed to evaluate distorted aspects of AMAE. One hundred and twenty-four undergraduate students participated as the rater who rated the AMAE scale (20 items) and an abbreviated form of Big-Five;Neo-PI-R, NEO-FFI (60 items). It was found that there were significant positive correlations between AMAEDesire and neuroticism (N), between AMAE-Acceptance and N, extroversion (E), or agreeableness (A), between AMAE-Contortion and N. It was also found that there were significant negative correlations between AMAEDesire and openness (O), between AMAE-Contortion and O or A, between AMAE-Rejection and E, O, or A. The implication of these findings was discussed in line with the predisposition of Japanese culture.
著者
玉瀬 耕治 相原 和雄
出版者
奈良教育大学
雑誌
奈良教育大学紀要. 人文・社会科学 (ISSN:05472393)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.54, no.1, pp.49-61, 2005-10-31

Using a multi-dimensional Amae scale developed by Tamase and Aihara (2004), the relationships between interdependent Amae and sympathy, and distorted Amae and narcissism were explored. Seventy male undergraduates and a hundred and thirty-seven female undergraduates served as the subjects. They were instructed to rate each item of the four Likert-type rating scales: the multi-dimensionl Mmae scale, the sympathy scale (Uchida & Kitayama, 2001), the trust scale (Amagai, 1995), and the narcissism scale (Okada, 1999). As expected, it was found that (a) there was a significant correlation between interdependent Amae and sympathy (γ=.53), and also (b) there was a significant correlation between distorted Amae and narcissism (γ=50). Multiple regression analyses revealed that sympathy was relatively well explained by interdependent Amae (β=.49), while the egocentrism factor in narcissism was well explained by distorted Amae (β=.53). These results were discussed in line with Doi's Amae theory and multicultural perspective.