著者
森 久美子 福田 恭介 松尾 太加志 志堂寺 和則 早見 武人
出版者
福岡県立大学人間社会学部
雑誌
福岡県立大学人間社会学部紀要 (ISSN:13490230)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.23, no.2, pp.33-44, 2015-02

Pupil dilation is mediated by the inhibition of the parasympathetic Edinger-Westphal oculomotor and the facilitation of sympathetic ophthalmic nerve activity. That emotional and sensory events provoke pupillary dilation is well documented. We examined the relationship between pupillary response and depression-anxiety among university students through affective word presentation. Twenty-five students were classified into high (12students) or low (13 students) groups via all of the following-BDI (Beck Depression Inventory), depressive scheme, and STAI (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory). The students individually and voluntarily participated in an experiment whereby their right eye was recorded while affective words (positive, neutral, and negative) consisting of two Chinese-characters were presented successively on a computer monitor. Participants were instructed to determine whether they personally considered each words to be pleasant or unpleasant while pressing a key to the next affective word. Reaction time and pupil dilation were measured. Reaction time was found to be significantly longer in cases of neutral words than in cases of either positive or negative words.Pupil dilation appeared approximately one second after negative word onset, and approximately one second before neutral word onset. No significant difference in pupillary response and reaction time was observed between high-depressive or anxiety-affected groups. These results suggest that pupils may dilate due to the sympathetic activation associated with negative affection, and also by the information processing load associated with the determination of neutral words.
著者
福田 恭介 水口 美咲 松尾 太加志 志堂寺 和則 早見 武人
出版者
公益社団法人 日本心理学会
雑誌
心理学研究 (ISSN:00215236)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.92, no.2, pp.122-128, 2021 (Released:2021-06-25)
参考文献数
23
被引用文献数
1

The “Tip of the Tongue” (TOT) is a well-known phenomenon in which one cannot recall the name of a familiar person or object but can recall related words. In the TOT state, cognitive processing activities based on relating information are frequently performed. Blinking is suppressed when waiting for information and when inputting or processing information, and instead occurs at the end of the processing phase. However, the relationship between blinking and the TOT state is not yet clear. In this study, we investigated how the timing of blink suppression and occurrence changes during the TOT state. We presented successive facial photographs of famous people interspersed with those of unknown persons. The participant’s task was to name the person during recall-stimulus after each of the photographs. The participant’s responses were classified as “Recognized,” “TOT,” and “Not recognized.” Our results indicated that blink suppression occurred most frequently while waiting for the recall-stimulus period in “Not recognized” responses, whereas suppression occurred least frequently in TOT responses. We conclude that blink suppression and occurrence is related to memory-system-access processing.
著者
福田 恭介 水口 美咲 松尾 太加志 志堂寺 和則 早見 武人
出版者
公益社団法人 日本心理学会
雑誌
心理学研究 (ISSN:00215236)
巻号頁・発行日
pp.92.20023, (Released:2021-03-31)
参考文献数
23
被引用文献数
1

The “Tip of the Tongue” (TOT) is a well-known phenomenon in which one cannot recall the name of a familiar person or object but can recall related words. In the TOT state, cognitive processing activities based on relating information are frequently performed. Blinking is suppressed when waiting for information and when inputting or processing information, and instead occurs at the end of the processing phase. However, the relationship between blinking and the TOT state is not yet clear. In this study, we investigated how the timing of blink suppression and occurrence changes during the TOT state. We presented successive facial photographs of famous people interspersed with those of unknown persons. The participant’s task was to name the person during recall-stimulus after each of the photographs. The participant’s responses were classified as “Recognized,” “TOT,” and “Not recognized.” Our results indicated that blink suppression occurred most frequently while waiting for the recall-stimulus period in “Not recognized” responses, whereas suppression occurred least frequently in TOT responses. We conclude that blink suppression and occurrence is related to memory-system-access processing.