著者
Koichiro Kinugawa Yasushi Sakata Minoru Ono Shinichi Nunoda Koichi Toda Norihide Fukushima Akira Shiose Shogo Oishi Dai Yumino Teruhiko Imamura Miyoko Endo Yumiko Hori Koichi Kashiwa Kaoruko Aita Hiroyuki Kojin Yutaka Tejima Yoshiki Sawa
出版者
The Japanese Circulation Society
雑誌
Circulation Journal (ISSN:13469843)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.85, no.10, pp.1906-1917, 2021-09-24 (Released:2021-09-24)
参考文献数
21
被引用文献数
8

Destination therapy (DT) is the indication to implant a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in a patient with stage D heart failure who is not a candidate for heart transplantation. The implantable LVAD has been utilized in Japan since 2011 under the indication of bridge to transplant (BTT). After almost 10 year lag, DT has finally been approved and reimbursed in May 2021 in Japan. To initiate the DT program in Japan, revision of the LVAD indication from BTT is necessary. Also, in-depth discussion of caregiver issues as well as end-of-life care is indispensable. For that purpose, we assembled a DT committee of multidisciplinary members in August 2020, and started monthly discussions via web-based communication during the COVID-19 pandemic. This is a summary of the consensus reached after 6 months’ discussion, and we have included as many relevant topics as possible. Clinical application of DT has just started, and we are willing to revise this consensus to meet the forthcoming issues raised during real-world clinical experience.
著者
Teruhiko Imamura Koichiro Kinugawa Takashi Nishimura Koichi Toda Yoshikatsu Saiki Hiroshi Niinami Shinichi Nunoda Goro Matsumiya Motonobu Nishimura Hirokuni Arai Masanobu Yanase Norihide Fukushima Takeshi Nakatani Akira Shiose Ikuko Shibasaki Yasushi Sakata Minoru Ono J-MACS Investigators
出版者
The Japanese Circulation Society
雑誌
Circulation Journal (ISSN:13469843)
巻号頁・発行日
pp.CJ-23-0264, (Released:2023-06-01)
参考文献数
18
被引用文献数
2

Background: Recently, destination therapy (DT) was approved in Japan, and patients ineligible for heart transplantation may now receive durable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Several conventional risk scores are available, but a risk score that is best to select optimal candidates for DT in the Japanese population remains unestablished.Methods and Results: A total of 1,287 patients who underwent durable LVAD implantation and were listed for the Japanese registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (J-MACS) were eligible for inclusion. Finally, 494 patients were assigned to the derivation cohort and 487 patients were assigned to the validation cohort. According to the time-to-event analyses, J-MACS risk scores were newly constructed to predict 3-year mortality rate, consisting of age, history of cardiac surgery, serum creatinine level, and central venous pressure to pulmonary artery wedge pressure ratio >0.71. The J-MACS risk score had the highest predictability of 3-year death compared with other conventional scores in the validation cohort, including HeartMate II risk score and HeartMate 3 risk score.Conclusions: We constructed the J-MACS risk score to estimate 3-year mortality rate after durable LVAD implantation using large-scale multicenter Japanese data. The clinical utility of this scoring to guide the indication of DT should be validated in the next study.
著者
Asami Yoshimura Noriko Kikuchi Satoshi Saito Atsushi Suzuki Hidetoshi Hattori Morio Shoda Yuki Ichihara Hiroshi Niinami Nobuhisa Hagiwara Junichi Yamaguchi Shinichi Nunoda
出版者
The Japanese Circulation Society
雑誌
Circulation Reports (ISSN:24340790)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.4, no.9, pp.405-411, 2022-09-09 (Released:2022-09-09)
参考文献数
23
被引用文献数
1

Background: For elderly patients with refractory heart failure (HF), destination therapy (DT) with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is a possible treatment. The aim of DT is for long-term, satisfying quality of life on LVAD support. Previously, elderly non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) were primarily destined for palliative care, but DT has been available in Japan since April 30, 2021. This study investigated the prognosis of elderly CRT non-responders and assessed the feasibility of DT in these patients based on the J-HeartMate Risk Score (J-HMRS).Methods and Results: Of the 559 patients who underwent CRT at Tokyo Women’s Medical University between 2000 and 2018, 198 were aged 65–75 years. Among these, 76 were identified as non-responders based on echocardiographic data, and were included in this study. We calculated patients’ J-HMRS and investigated associations between the J-HMRS and cardiac events after CRT. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the J-HMRS: low (n=23), medium (n=29), and high (n=24) risk. Patients in the low-risk group experienced as many HF rehospitalizations and ventricular arrhythmia events as those in the other groups. However, survival analysis revealed that, after CRT, survival was higher for patients in the low- compared with high-risk group (P=0.04).Conclusions: The J-HMRS classified 30% of elderly CRT non-responders as low risk and as suitable candidates for DT in Japan.
著者
Hidetoshi Hattori Atsushi Suzuki Tsuyoshi Shiga Tomohiro Nishinaka Satoshi Saito Kenji Yamazaki Shinichi Nunoda Nobuhisa Hagiwara
出版者
The Japanese Circulation Society
雑誌
Circulation Journal (ISSN:13469843)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.82, no.9, pp.2305-2310, 2018-08-24 (Released:2018-08-24)
参考文献数
22
被引用文献数
1

Background: Recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTA) are “A factor” modifiers in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile. The effect of recurrent VTA on clinical outcome, however, is controversial. We evaluated the impact of recurrent VTA on outcome in Japanese heart transplant candidates with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Methods and Results: Sixty-six adult patients with advanced heart failure who were listed for heart transplantation between January 2005 and October 2017 were enrolled in the study. Recurrent VTA (modifier A status) was defined as a sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation that required implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks or an external defibrillator more than twice weekly. The primary outcome was death from any cause. The secondary outcomes were the first occurrence of VTA and recurrent VTA after LVAD implantation. Sixteen patients (24%) met the criteria for modifier A status, and 15 patients had an LVAD implanted. During a median follow-up of 1,124 days, 21 of 60 patients with an LVAD died. There was a significantly higher mortality rate in LVAD patients with modifier A status than in those who did not meet the modifier A criteria. On multivariate analysis, patients with modifier A status had an increased risk of mortality (HR, 3.43; 95% CI: 1.30–8.61, P=0.001). Conclusions: Recurrent VTA might be a marker for worse outcome in Japanese heart transplant candidates with an LVAD.