Ceek.jp Altmetrics (α ver.)
  1. ホーム
  2. 文献一覧: Tomohiro Nishinaka (著者)
  3. 2件

11 0 0 0 OA JCS/JSCVS/JATS/JSVS 2021 Guideline on Implantable Left Ventricular Assist Device for Patients With Advanced Heart Failure

著者
Minoru Ono Osamu Yamaguchi Tomohito Ohtani Koichiro Kinugawa Yoshikatsu Saiki Yoshiki Sawa Akira Shiose Hiroyuki Tsutsui Norihide Fukushima Goro Matsumiya Masanobu Yanase Kenji Yamazaki Kazuhiro Yamamoto Masatoshi Akiyama Teruhiko Imamura Kiyotaka Iwasaki Miyoko Endo Yoshihiko Ohnishi Takahiro Okumura Koichi Kashiwa Osamu Kinoshita Kaori Kubota Osamu Seguchi Koichi Toda Hiroshi Nishioka Tomohiro Nishinaka Takashi Nishimura Toru Hashimoto Masaru Hatano Haruhiko Higashi Taiki Higo Takeo Fujino Yumiko Hori Toru Miyoshi Motoharu Yamanaka Takayuki Ohno Takeshi Kimura Shunei Kyo Yasushi Sakata Takeshi Nakatani on behalf of the JCS/JSCVS/JATS/JSVS Joint Working Group
出版者
The Japanese Circulation Society
雑誌
Circulation Journal (ISSN:13469843)
巻号頁・発行日
pp.CJ-21-0880, (Released:2022-04-05)
参考文献数
288
被引用文献数
10

2 0 0 0 OA Impact of Recurrent Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia on Outcome in Japanese Heart Transplant Candidates With a Left Ventricular Assist Device

著者
Hidetoshi Hattori Atsushi Suzuki Tsuyoshi Shiga Tomohiro Nishinaka Satoshi Saito Kenji Yamazaki Shinichi Nunoda Nobuhisa Hagiwara
出版者
The Japanese Circulation Society
雑誌
Circulation Journal (ISSN:13469843)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.82, no.9, pp.2305-2310, 2018-08-24 (Released:2018-08-24)
参考文献数
22
被引用文献数
1
Background: Recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTA) are “A factor” modifiers in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile. The effect of recurrent VTA on clinical outcome, however, is controversial. We evaluated the impact of recurrent VTA on outcome in Japanese heart transplant candidates with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Methods and Results: Sixty-six adult patients with advanced heart failure who were listed for heart transplantation between January 2005 and October 2017 were enrolled in the study. Recurrent VTA (modifier A status) was defined as a sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation that required implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks or an external defibrillator more than twice weekly. The primary outcome was death from any cause. The secondary outcomes were the first occurrence of VTA and recurrent VTA after LVAD implantation. Sixteen patients (24%) met the criteria for modifier A status, and 15 patients had an LVAD implanted. During a median follow-up of 1,124 days, 21 of 60 patients with an LVAD died. There was a significantly higher mortality rate in LVAD patients with modifier A status than in those who did not meet the modifier A criteria. On multivariate analysis, patients with modifier A status had an increased risk of mortality (HR, 3.43; 95% CI: 1.30–8.61, P=0.001). Conclusions: Recurrent VTA might be a marker for worse outcome in Japanese heart transplant candidates with an LVAD.