著者
市原 攝子
出版者
北海道大学大学院国際広報メディア・観光学院 = Graduate School of International Media, Communication, and Tourism Studies, Hokkaido University
雑誌
国際広報メディア・観光学ジャーナル
巻号頁・発行日
vol.23, pp.3-19, 2016-09-30

Soon after two cervical cancer vaccines were introduced in 2009 in Japan, their severe adverse drug reactions (ADR) were recognized, which put the vaccines' safety and efficacy in question. Using the concept of Ulrich Beck's ‘individualization’, this paper examines the decision-making process of those who chose these vaccines and suffered from severe ADR. It also looks at how they took responsibility for their choices, revealing the fact that the sufferers of ADR were surrounded by aggressive marketing campaigns and vaccine support organizations, economic measures such as free inoculations, and the powerful effects of intermediate groups (school, family, local community and so on). This paper argues that the choice of these vaccines showed that individualization in Japan is uneven because of a gap between subjective individualization and objective individualization, which makes individual decision making difficult.

言及状況

Twitter (35 users, 39 posts, 34 favorites)

Add. https://t.co/5C5PxRkZuy https://t.co/jQQdCAuXZE https://t.co/cWKk5paFYi https://t.co/4eSUsZ4AFo https://t.co/uZH4sz5zhc
@tcv2catnap 続編もあった。「個人化する社会における選択と責任 : 日本における子宮頸がんワクチン事業を事例に」市原 攝子 https://t.co/eE8vSlowY3
北大博士課程・市原攝子「子宮頸がんワクチン事業における医学というサブ政治」16-03-25 https://t.co/iXSk4HAhTg 同じく市原攝子「個人化する社会における選択と責任:日本における子宮頸がんワクチン事業を事例… https://t.co/lkv3ABH15S
>~の中間集団は、ワクチン接種をして副反応に遭 うというリスクを逃れた状態にあり、それゆえに、接種に関する自分の意見 を述べているのではなく、制度における中間集団の代弁者として機能してい る。(13p)https://t.co/WdHs3vow9B

収集済み URL リスト