著者
朴 根午 大村 謙二郎 有田 智一
出版者
公益社団法人 都市住宅学会
雑誌
都市住宅学 (ISSN:13418157)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.2007, no.59, pp.51-56, 2007-10-25 (Released:2012-08-01)
参考文献数
5

The purpose of this paper is to clarify the actual situation and the problem of land use control in greenbelt areas around Seoul Metropolitan Area. The case study area is Siheung City which is located in a neighborhood of Seoul City. The main findings are as follows: 1) In the land of the case study area, the classification of land category was largely changed to road sites by the local government. 2) The mixture of factories, warehouses and residential houses have appeared in the case study area. 3) Land prices in the case study area have increased evidently since the removal of the greenbelt in 2001-2002. Consequently, we suggest the trial of partial control technique at the time of cancellation of greenbelt, because this could be applied for considering the actual situation andtopographical characters in released greenbelt areas.
著者
浅見 泰司
出版者
公益社団法人 都市住宅学会
雑誌
都市住宅学 (ISSN:13418157)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.2009, no.64, pp.137-143, 2009-01-31 (Released:2012-08-01)
参考文献数
8

This paper examines the optimal majority rule and amount of social loss for consensus building in the event of rehabilitation of condominiums, when there is a correlation among benefits of stakeholders. The results show that (1) simple majority rule is optima even when excess compensation is necessary and even when there is some resistance in agreement for rehabilitation;(2) the larger the correlation among the benefits of stakeholders, the larger social loss may incur by having stricter majority rule;(3) the number of stakeholders does not influence so much concerning the optimal majority rule. These results suggesthat the 4/5 majority rule in current sectional ownership law should be amended to a simple majority rule or similar mild majority rule.
著者
田島 夏与 今井 美矢子 村田 喜彦
出版者
公益社団法人 都市住宅学会
雑誌
都市住宅学 (ISSN:13418157)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.2011, no.75, pp.44-49, 2011

Using a questionnaire survey dataset with 4,120 respondents, this paper examines the impacts of individuals' attributes on their preferences to various Quality of Life factors, as well as whether the actual choices of city reflects their preferences. For QOL factors such as the public transit, access to work, natural environment and clean air/water, satisfaction levels show clear geographical patterns and access-related factors earn high scores in the city center, whereas the nature-related factors are higher in the suburb. In these attributes, correlation between city residents' emphasis on these attributes and satisfaction scores are high, suggesting that people can successfully choose the place of living according to their emphases. For other factors, such as childcare/education and other public services provided by the municipalities, residential preferences for and the city's offerings are rarely aligned. One possible reason is that the information on the level and availability of these services is difficult for prospective residents to know.