著者
佐藤 泉
出版者
成蹊大学アジア太平洋研究センター
雑誌
アジア太平洋研究 = Review of Asian and Pacific studies (ISSN:09138439)
巻号頁・発行日
no.42, pp.71-85, 2017

This paper considers two Japanese-speaking authors from the linguistic view. Park Kyong Mi places "translation" at the core of poetic experience, and senses the inner gap of language. Sakiyama Tami, a Novelist in Okinawa, tries to put a voice inside the language through conflict between Japanese as a literary language and everyday language.
著者
松田 潤
出版者
成蹊大学アジア太平洋研究センター
雑誌
アジア太平洋研究 = Review of Asian and Pacific studies (ISSN:09138439)
巻号頁・発行日
no.41, pp.45-61, 2016

In this paper, the topics concerning of mourning and melancholy are discussed in reference to "Namaeyotattearuke Nakaya Kokichi Ikousyu"(1972). First, the potential and limit of Nakaya's participation in Movement at Ryukyu University though 1960s which was triggered by the death of his niece in the incident of 1959 Okinawa F-100 Crash will be examined in a historical context. I will further examine that the movement was aiming to overcome an aspect of its sectionality and inflexibility and to criticize the significance of Reversion Movement in Japan in the context of historical trend in Neo-leftism. Secondly, Nakaya's journey for 40 days in his "motherland Japan" was the second trigger after the death of his niece to change his perspectives. Nakaya's arrest for occupation in Legislature of the Government of the Ryukyu Islands was evaluated to be separation from representative politics and to be in the process of population becoming "people". Lastly, the poem of Nakaya's which was believed to be Nakaya's fail in political conflicts should be dealt. Nakaya endeavored to perpetuate his poem and death by the means of opposition to the contemporary political system. In addition, whether the way of incorporation of the trace of alterity and endless mourning work or not should be.
著者
小林 盾 大﨑 裕子 川端 健嗣 渡邉 大輔
出版者
成蹊大学アジア太平洋研究センター
雑誌
アジア太平洋研究 = Review of Asian and Pacific studies (ISSN:09138439)
巻号頁・発行日
no.42, pp.115-126, 2017

This paper scrutinizes on transformation of the romantic love ideology in Japan. The ideology has characterized the modern family by uniting love, marriage, and sex (and therefore birth). The paper decomposes the ideology into two sub norms: the "love and marriage combination" norm and the "marriage and birth combination" norm. Still, these norms are yet to be quantitatively examined. So, data are collected in the 2015 Japanese National Survey on Social Stratification and Life Course (SSL-2015) with 12,007 respondents. They are asked whether they agree that love is indispensable for marriage and that marriage is so for birth. Results are shown as follows. (1) By distributions, about 80 percent agree with the both norms. (2) By comparing proportions, most young males and females relax the norms. However, young females tighten the "marriage and birth combination" norm. (3) As a result, by odds ratios, young males present consistent patterns on the two norms, while young females not. Therefore, mostly the romantic love ideology has been relaxed, but the "marriage and birth combination" norm survives and even revitalizes. This means that the ideology has been transformed and diversified, which may affect future forms of the family. These findings are obtained only in quantitative analyses.