著者
森田 尚人
出版者
滋賀大学経済学会
雑誌
彦根論叢 (ISSN:03875989)
巻号頁・発行日
no.383, pp.1-33[含 英語文要旨], 2010-03

Izawa Shuji who was one of the leading educators in early modernJapan published a famous textbook on education that has been the firstbook titled "Pedagogy" in Japan. He also the first person who introducedevolution theory by translating T. H. Huxley's On the Origin of Species. Although these works were frequently referred in textbooks on both historyof education and history of science, their contents and relations betweenthem have never been analyzed nor argued in their historical contexts. In 1875 Ministry of Education sent three young men to the UnitedState to investigate teacher training course in normal schools. Izawa wasadmitted to Bridgewater Normal School and studied under Albert G.Boyden whose transcript of a lecture provided the source of his Pedagogy.Examining Izawa's handwritten notes, we find that Boyden's lecture was profoundly influenced by Mark Hopkins' An Outline Study ofMan. In this book Hopkins discussed psychological and ethical nature ofman from the standpoint of Scottish "common sense" philosophy, so Scot's tradition of mental philosophy was reflected in Izawa's Pedagogy.Nevertheless Hopkins who could not keep out of the impact of evolutionrecognized man as a organism and paved the way for Izawa's acceptanceof evolution theory. After graduation Izawa went to Lawrence Scientific School at Harvard, where he studied a variety of subjects in natural science. Upon his return to Japan Izawa became head of Tokyo NormalSchool. Izawa's faith in education as scientific thinking as well as morallyuplifting had its roots in contemporary American education. Izawawas expecting Japanese educators for acquiring scientific method and knowledge and applying them practically.
著者
中野桂
出版者
滋賀大学経済経営研究所
雑誌
彦根論叢
巻号頁・発行日
no.357, 2006-01-31
著者
二上 季代司
出版者
滋賀大学経済学会
雑誌
彦根論叢 (ISSN:03875989)
巻号頁・発行日
no.395, pp.114-127, 2013

Transition to the negotiated commission regimefrom fixed one and to the registration system from the licensing system in securitiesbusiness has entered the field of view in 1990s,at the same time the unbundling of securitiesbrokerage business has begun. In this paper, Ishow that the unbundling of these securitiesbusiness has been in the background the transitionto economic maturity from high-growth economy.
著者
有馬 敏則
出版者
滋賀大学経済学会
雑誌
彦根論叢 (ISSN:03875989)
巻号頁・発行日
no.第220号, pp.47-68, 1983-05
著者
有馬 敏則
出版者
滋賀大学
雑誌
彦根論叢 (ISSN:03875989)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.220, pp.47-68, 1983-05
著者
川瀬 光義
出版者
滋賀大学経済学会
雑誌
彦根論叢 (ISSN:03875989)
巻号頁・発行日
no.第415号, pp.60-75, 2018-02 (Released:2018-09-13)
著者
河相俊之
出版者
滋賀大学経済経営研究所
雑誌
彦根論叢
巻号頁・発行日
no.372, 2008-04-30
著者
水地 宗明
出版者
滋賀大学
雑誌
彦根論叢 (ISSN:03875989)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.224, pp.1-25, 1984-01
著者
小栗 誠治
出版者
滋賀大学経済学会
雑誌
彦根論叢 (ISSN:03875989)
巻号頁・発行日
no.405, pp.92-111, 2015

This paper inquires into the essence of the bank note and the seigniorage in central bank, and in the light of this inquiry this paper presents a unified accounting understanding of the bank note issued by central bank and of the coin issued by government. It is indispensable to the financial soundness of central bank that central bank grasps the essence of the bank note and the coin and that it does accurately accounting for them. Furthermore, the financial soundness is essential in maintaining the credibility of central bank and it forms the basis of accomplishing the mission of central bank. This paper consists of as follows: (1) the views over the nature of the modern bank note (inconvertible bank note) are investigated and the reason why bank note is debt is explained. (2) the essence of the seigniorage and its accounting understanding are discussed, and the accounting methods of the seigniorage in current central bank are assessed. (3) the details of the accounting of the bank note and the coin are investigated concretely. (4) being based on the nature of debt in currency, a unified accounting understanding of the bank note and the coin is presented conceptually.
著者
藤田 真樹
出版者
滋賀大学経済学会
雑誌
彦根論叢 (ISSN:03875989)
巻号頁・発行日
no.402, pp.4-18, 2014

On June 20, 2014, Japanese Congress passedthe revision of Companies Act. In this amendment,introduction of double derivative actionis drawing the attention of not only academiccommentators but also practitioners. It ispointed that Japanese double derivative actionis mainly influenced by American common law.However American courts and academiccommentators have had difficulty finding a singletheory in support of double derivativeaction. American legal scholars suggested thatdouble derivative suit have two purposes in thesame way as single derivative suit: compensationand deterrence. But American scholarsargued that which the main purpose is.Japanese double derivative suit is also rationalizedby two purposes as well as singlederivative suit by the Japanese Ministry of Justice'sLegislative Council Subcommittee on theCompanies Act. But Japanese Double derivativesuit seemed to be introduced mainlyemphasizing on compensation, Neverthelessrecent Japanese academic trend tend to emphasizeon deterrence in concern of singlederivative suit. I doubt Japanese police makerselected consistent policy concerning doublederivative suit compared with single derivativesuit.Therefore we will take a look at the theoriesof American double derivative action, then wewill check the Japanese double derivative actionfrom a comparative point of view, and pointout the problems of Japanese double derivativeaction.