著者
磯崎 行雄 丸山 茂徳 青木 一勝 中間 隆晃 宮下 敦 大藤 茂
出版者
公益社団法人 東京地学協会
雑誌
地学雑誌 (ISSN:0022135X)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.119, no.6, pp.999-1053, 2010-12-25 (Released:2011-03-17)
参考文献数
145
被引用文献数
26 74

The geotectonic subdivision and relevant definitions of geotectonic units in the Japanese Islands are revised on the basis of new data, particularly with detrital zircon dating of U-Pb ages and seismic profiling of the deep arc crust across the islands. In addition to the final confirmation of the subhorizontal structures of the Paleozoic to Cenozoic accretionary complexes and their high-P/T metamorphosed equivalents, several new aspects were recognized; i.e., detection of the eastern extension of the collisional suture between the Sino-Korean and Yangtze cratons in the Higo belt with medium-pressure-type metamorphism in SW Japan, and separation of the traditional Sanbagawa belt into two distinct metamorphic belts characterized by mutually different ages of protolith AC-formation and peak metamorphism. The occurrence and consumption of 4 Paleozoic to Mesozoic granite batholiths, as major provenances for the ancient Japanese Islands, are documented by detrital zircon dating of Paleozoic–Mesozoic sandstones. With respect to these new findings, the definitions of unit boundaries were thoroughly revised in terms of chronological spectrum in “ocean plate stratigraphy–metamorphism”. The geological significance of 5 major tectonic lines (faults) of the Pacific-type (or Miyashiro-type) orogen in Japan, i.e., the Nagato–Hida marginal TL, Osayama–Omi TL, Ishigaki–Kuga TL, Paleo–Median TL, and Butsuzo TL, is discussed. The current revision of the geotectonic subdivision and definitions of component units and their mutual boundaries leads to the following conclusions, which challenge the conventional understanding of the orogenic history of the Japanese Islands. (1) Proto-Japan in the Early Paleozoic was located closer to the South China (Yangtze) craton rather than the North China (Sino–Korean) craton. (2) Ever since 520 Ma, subduction of past Pacific ocean floors formed mature arc-trench systems with a full set of granite batholith, fore-arc basin, accretionary complex, and high-P/T metamorphosed equivalents at least 5 times; however, the former 4 sets were almost completely destroyed, with the exception of smaller tectonic blocks that currently occur within serpentinite mélange. (3) Tectonic erosion played a significant role in consuming ancient fore-arc crusts including 4 granite batholiths of the Paleozoic to mid-Mesozoic. (4) Serpentine mélange represents the former Wadati–Benioff plane along which tectonic erosion took place. (5) The Japanese Islands, which basically developed along the Yangtze continental margin, have experienced multiple episodes of oceanward growth and continentward retreat due to alternating subduction-accretion and tectonic erosion. (6) Net production of juvenile crust occurred on a large scale along the Japan margin during the 500 million year-long oceanic subduction regime since the Cambrian; however, intensive tectonic erosion effectively erased the older crusts from the surface and enriched the underlying sub-arc mantle with heat-generating continental material.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Yahoo!知恵袋 (1 users, 3 posts)

「日本列島の地体構造区分再訪」 https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jgeography/119/6/119_6_999/_pdf このファイルの3ページ目に、図1 日本列島の地体構造区分があります。 この図を見ると西日本から関東まで、美濃・丹波帯、領家帯、三波川帯、四万十帯などが連続していることが分かります。 東の端は棚倉構造線に切られていま ...
古い方から大理石、御影石、庵治石の順でしょう。 大理石は、海洋のホットスポットによる火山島の環礁などで礁石灰岩が堆積して、それが付加体として付加し、さらに地上まで隆起し、後にその付近が火山帯になってマグマで熱変成を受けなくてはなりません。 なので原岩としては大理石がもっとも古いでしょう。 日本の古い大理石ならば、3億~2億年以上前の石炭紀、ペルム紀の礁石灰岩が原岩になるでしょう。 ...
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/result/-char/ja/?item1=4&word1=%E4%B8%89%E6%B3%A2%E5%B7%9D%E5%A4%89%E6%88%90%E5%B8%AF 三波川変成帯の何について知りたいのか、できるだけ詳しく教えてください。 さて、補足がないのでこの論文を紹介します。 「日本列島の地体構造区分再訪」 h ...

Twitter (7 users, 7 posts, 28 favorites)

@niwawa25 そういえば、僕が昔最初に日本の地質全体の概観を勉強したときに使ったのはこういうやつでした https://t.co/9u5EHWU5ff
いくつかメモ: 〇中央構造線ってなに https://t.co/TGywUrTtk5 〇日本列島と周辺海域の地震地体構造区分PDF https://t.co/8yZNZbRscl 〇日本列島の地体構造区分再訪PDF https://t.co/qLMHILPeWh
@Yuasa_Yusuke  地質からの視点なら、マル氏・イソ氏のこの論文(日本語)と、このときの特集号にまとまってるのあるから良いと思う。 https://t.co/yh3zI82WYX https://t.co/V5w9fUhuGq

収集済み URL リスト