著者
立花 希一
出版者
日本科学哲学会
雑誌
科学哲学 (ISSN:02893428)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.31, no.1, pp.85-99, 1998-05-10 (Released:2009-05-29)

This paper deals with the problem whether Popper's falsificationism has been refuted by the Duhem-Quine thesis. According to the Duhem-Quine thesis it is not an isolated hypothesis but a theory as a whole that is subjected to an experimental test. And it is claimed that by adding an ad hoc hypothesis or by changing a minor auxiliary hypothesis any falsifications of a theory as a whole can be evaded or at least main hypotheses can be saved from falsifications. Against this I claim that it is not always possible to evade the falsifications. Thus Popper's falsificationism has not been refuted by the Duhem-Quine thesis.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

はてなブックマーク (1 users, 1 posts)

Twitter (4 users, 5 posts, 1 favorites)

立花希一「デュエム=クワイン・テーゼとポパー」 https://t.co/al8Oi4lLCE
反証主義関連で行くと、ここら辺も面白いと思う https://t.co/Or82Kmc6XG 「デュエム=クワイン・テーゼとポパー」
https://t.co/Or82Kmc6XG 「デュエム=クワイン・テーゼとポパー」 後で読む

収集済み URL リスト