著者
吉田 寛
出版者
The Society for Research in Asiatic Music (Toyo Ongaku Gakkai, TOG)
雑誌
東洋音楽研究 (ISSN:00393851)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.2001, no.66, pp.17-36,L3, 2001-08-20 (Released:2010-02-25)

Kozu Senzaburo (1852-97) is known as one of the central figures of Ongaku-torishirabe-gakari (Institute of Music) in Tokyo, and also famous for his major writing, Ongaku-no-rigai (Interests of Music), which has been recognized as one of the earliest works of modern Japanese musicology. Quoting no less than four hundred and fifty documents, ranging from time-honored Japanese and Chinese books to the newest Western writings, this compilation shows us plenty of musical anecdotes and episodes taken from various places and periods in the world. Arguing fully the influences and effects of music on human nature, it established a solid basis in theory for the educational policies of the Institute. Although this writing has been examined within the cultural contexts in Japan and Asia, few scholars have argued it in relation to the Western musical thoughts. This article examines the following: (1) the sorts of Western documents Kozu quoted, (2) the reasons for his selection, and (3) the ways in which he appropriated them for his own purpose.Born in Shinano, young Kozu cultivated himself within the circumstances of the Confucian tradition. He went up to Tokyo in 1869 and then studied English at private schools. When the new government determined to send young talents abroad to survey the educational systems in the modern nations, he was selected as one of members sent to the United States. Kozu seems to have been a student of the New York State Normal School at Albany from 1875 to 1877. There he learned the modern methods of artistic education such as vocal music and drawing, and gained knowledge of contemporary Western literatures on music, especially by British and American writers, and therefore established his own view on music, chiefly based on theories of music education in America (L. Mason), anthropology (Ch. Darwin) and comparative musicology (C. Engel and A. J. Ellis) in England. He is distinguished from the twentieth-century Japanese musicologists, who were mostly attracted by the German aesthetics of music.Kozu's view on music fostered in his Albany years had a definitive effect on the policy of Torishirabe-gakari and subsequent music education in modern Japan. In 1881, he was appointed to one of the supervisors of Torishirabe-gakari, founded two years before. At the Institute, he taught English, translated foreign books on musical grammar and harmony and gave lectures on music theory and history. His first theoretical work appeared in Ongaku-torishirabe-seiseki-shinposho (Report on the Result of the Investigations Concerning Music), which is a collaborative work with Izawa Shuji, the head director of the Institute. It includes “Ongaku-enkaku-taiko (Outlines on the History of Music)” and “Meiji-sho-sentei-no-koto (On the Selection of National Anthem for the Meiji Era)”, both of which are brief but comprehensive. In the former the author argues, chiefly referring to C. Engel's An Introduction to the Study of National Music (1866), that the Western diatonic scale and the Eastern pentatonic scale both originate in the pentatonic scale of Ancient India, as the Indo-European languages do, and emphasizes that the effect and interests of music has universal values. Here, however, he altered Engel's original arguments to accommodate them into the so-called “eclectic” policy of the Institute. In the latter essay, while summarizing the history of national anthems in European countries, Kozu examines how we can make an effective song that attracts people's attention and make their temperament obedient to the government. This report can be regarded as an important step to his more elaborate plan of Rigai.Ongaku-no-rigai (1891) consists of three parts with twenty-four volumes and three hundred fifty chapters. Each part shows, from the beginning, “Music and People, ” “Music and National Government” and

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (10 users, 12 posts, 11 favorites)

吉田寛(2001)によると、今から20年近く前、欧米の音楽学者のなかから、19世紀に登場した「天才」「傑作」(名曲)を特権的な考察対象とするドイツ的な音楽学に対して見直しを提唱する人々が現れた。 https://t.co/GuzYyTe2fV
見切り発車もいいところなんだけど、これを押し付けられた神津仙三郎のことを思うと涙が出ちゃう https://t.co/GuzYyTe2fV https://t.co/SXAPTX4Ike
@takashi1950 おおおお!眺めてみましたが情けないことに私では読めないなあ... https://t.co/FNOfXzwGI7 手始めに吉田寛のこれを読んでみようと思います、ありがとうございます! https://t.co/GuzYyTe2fV なるほど、伊澤修二の片腕的存在...
@leleLemon2525 ひらがな書き下し文をお求めですね? 吉田寛「神津仙三郎『音楽利害』(明治二四年)と明治前期の音楽思想世紀―音楽思想史再考のために」 https://t.co/7UVgTzkUgd →21ページ下の段「一-二-二長音階国家文教先進説」
@sourd 「音楽利害」は吉田寛さんの論考https://t.co/zXj9RFxoG6が参考になりますが、音楽という形のないものを音階理論で文明化させようとした取り組みが は、Visible speechに相通ずる姿勢、明治期の特質かもしれませんね。
吉田寛「神津仙三郎『音楽利害』(明治二四年) と明治前期の音楽思想ー一九世紀音楽思想史再考のために」『東洋音楽研究』66 、2001年。https://t.co/QrIRcdIAZJ
論文をいただきました→吉田寛「神津仙三郎『音楽利害』(明治二四年) と明治前期の音楽思想-一九世紀音楽思想史再考のために-」(2001) https://t.co/GY6I7vNxci

Wikipedia (1 pages, 1 posts, 1 contributors)

収集済み URL リスト