著者
大井 赤亥
出版者
日本政治学会
雑誌
年報政治学 (ISSN:05494192)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.71, no.1, pp.1_106-1_127, 2020 (Released:2021-06-16)
参考文献数
27
被引用文献数
1

冷戦終焉に伴う 「革新」 の一方的衰退をへて、1990年代以降の日本政治は、コンセンサス型意思決定によって利益配分を担ってきた 「守旧保守」 と、強いリーダーシップによって行政機構の縮小再編成を断行する 「改革保守」 との対立軸へと変容した。ここにおいて支配的趨勢となったのは 「改革保守」 であり、「改革」 が 「革新」 を代替して現状打開のための結集軸を担うようになった。 親社会主義と憲法9条を旗印とした 「革新」 と、規制緩和や民営化と日米同盟を基軸とする 「改革」 とは似て非なるものである。55年体制下において 「革新」 が左から自民党政治を攻撃したとすれば、ポスト冷戦下においては 「改革」 が自民党政治を右から解体しようとしたのであり、その方向性において二つのシンボルの出所は真逆であった。 しかしながら、「革新」 と 「改革」 とは、いずれも官僚主導や自民党の利益配分政治を否定する点において類似してもきた。二つのシンボルはいずれも現状変革の結集軸となり、ある種の等価物として機能してきたのである。 本稿はそのような 「革新」 と 「改革」 の意図せざる共振と 「改革」 が孕んだ二面性を考察するものである。
著者
大井 赤亥
出版者
日本政治学会
雑誌
年報政治学 (ISSN:05494192)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.63, no.2, pp.2_288-2_308, 2012 (Released:2016-02-24)

The early 20th century was marked by the advent of both communism and fascism, and their challenges against the traditional western civilization. This paper examines the historical dynamism shown by those political struggles in the early 20th through the works of Laski. In the 1920s, Laski considered both communism and fascism as the negation of the legacies of western civilization. However, the political turmoil in the 1930s had led Laski to distinguish Soviet Union and Nazi Germany, and he thought Soviet communism as a “new civilization” which had been overcoming capitalist societies. But Laski's appreciation of Soviet communism was different from other British socialists in that Laski evaluated social welfare in Soviet Union as long as it served as the basis for individual freedom. This paper concludes that those Laski's ideas contain an actual potentiality in making contemporary criticism to liberal democracy after the collapse of Soviet communism.
著者
大井 赤亥
出版者
JAPANESE POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION
雑誌
年報政治学 (ISSN:05494192)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.60, no.2, pp.2_225-2_245, 2009 (Released:2013-02-07)

Harold Laski was once a popular political theorist in postwar Japanese politics. This paper examines the ‘Laski boom’ in the 1950s by comparing three Japanese political scholars: Masao Maruyama, Yoshihiko Seki, and Yasuzo Suzuki.   While Maruyama depicts Laski as a consistent thinker, Seki stresses Laski's waver in his theory of state and liberty. Meanwhile, while holding a Marxist perspective, Suzuki sincerely accepts Laski's individualism and his theory of liberty. Through the comparison, we shall comprehend that Maruyama and Suzuki similarly appreciate Laski's political ambivalence between western democracy and communism.   However, this paper also suggests a curious irregularity that Maruyama was attracted to Laski's gradual commitment to communism, and that Suzuki learned liberal theory of right from Laski. In conclusion, Laski's dilemma was also the shared dilemma of Maruyama and Suzuki, and this paper proves the ‘Laski boom’ in postwar Japanese politics as the intellectual cross-point where these political scholars intersected.
著者
大井 赤亥
出版者
日本政治学会
雑誌
日本政治學會年報政治學 (ISSN:05494192)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.60, no.2, pp.2_225-2_245, 2009

&nbsp;&nbsp;Harold Laski was once a popular political theorist in postwar Japanese politics. This paper examines the &lsquo;Laski boom&rsquo; in the 1950s by comparing three Japanese political scholars: Masao Maruyama, Yoshihiko Seki, and Yasuzo Suzuki. <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;While Maruyama depicts Laski as a consistent thinker, Seki stresses Laski's waver in his theory of state and liberty. Meanwhile, while holding a Marxist perspective, Suzuki sincerely accepts Laski's individualism and his theory of liberty. Through the comparison, we shall comprehend that Maruyama and Suzuki similarly appreciate Laski's political ambivalence between western democracy and communism. <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;However, this paper also suggests a curious irregularity that Maruyama was attracted to Laski's gradual commitment to communism, and that Suzuki learned liberal theory of right from Laski. In conclusion, Laski's dilemma was also the shared dilemma of Maruyama and Suzuki, and this paper proves the &lsquo;Laski boom&rsquo; in postwar Japanese politics as the intellectual cross-point where these political scholars intersected.