著者
朱 琳
出版者
関西大学文化交渉学教育研究拠点(ICIS)
雑誌
東アジア文化交渉研究 = Journal of East Asian Cultural Interaction Studies (ISSN:18827748)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.4, pp.193-212, 2011-03-31

This essay focuses on Liang Qichao( 1873-1929) and the significance of his role in the use of the word “civilization” 文明, a term that entered China from Japan and reflects Meiji-period modernity and values. Pursuing his cognizance of “civilization” as well as the changes in his understanding of this term, this research is the first in-depth investigation and explanation of Liang’s entire view of “civilization”. The first to be considered is Liang’s theories of environmental determinism and ethnography, both of which reflect Liang’s reception of “civilization” and the influence of Meiji Japan. This is followed with an analysis of Liang’s speech and conduct in the East- West Cultural Debate, something in which he threw himself whole-heartedly after seeing the scars of war during a tour of the West. Finally, this author touches upon his unstable personality and appeal of his opinions
著者
朱 琳
出版者
関西大学文化交渉学教育研究拠点(ICIS)
雑誌
東アジア文化交渉研究 = Journal of East Asian Cultural Interaction Studies (ISSN:18827748)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.5, pp.115-129, 2012-02-01

This essay focuses on Liang Qichao (1873-1929), an important figure in modern Chinese history, and explores his discussion and views of “revolution”. There are many who point to Kang and Liang as being the “reformation school”, but at the beginning of the 20th century, Liang Qichao experienced internal conflict over “reform” and “revolution”, and faced a watershed in his thinking. I have therefore turned to the concept of “revolution” as a suggestion or hint to analyse the interior and exterior background that led to the changes in Liang’s theory of “revolution” as well as the changes in his ideology in an attempt to portray Liang’s “change” and his “stability”.After providing a basic background for Liang’s activities, I focus on an historical setting for 1902, and open with a discussion of Liang’s political novel Xinzhongguo weilaiji, in which I consider the psychological conflict of “reform” and “revolution” in this work. I trace the changes in his ideology through an interpretation of Liang’s choice of terms for translation of “revolution” – geming [Jp. kakumei] – and the implications of this choice. I end with an analysis of his record of a tour of the United States in 1903 as part of my search to identify the catalyst that lead to the change in his ideology.Given that the Xinhai Revolution occurred one hundred years ago, I believe there is great significance in returning once more to the era in which the term geming, or“revolution”, first appeared.
著者
朱 琳
出版者
神奈川大学人文学研究所
雑誌
人文学研究所報 (ISSN:02877082)
巻号頁・発行日
no.52, pp.95-115, 2014-08

Taking its cue from the three "encounters" in the acceptance of an evolutionary theory, using the evolution of "despotism" and the basis of "politics" as keywords, this paper focuses on the Chinese historical accounts of Liang Qichao(梁啓超), which has not been systematically considered up to now, and aims to clarify the features thereof. Firstly, it analyzes in detail the three "encounters" of Kang Youwei (康有為)'s "The Thesis on the Three Stages to Datong(大同)", Yan Fu(厳復)'s "Evolution Theory(天演論)", and the evolutionary theory via Japan. Next, it clarifies the concrete application to the Chinese history, as well as the diagram of political system evolution presented by Liang Qichao. Furthermore, it considers the proposed new world view based on such application, and the discourse on "The Second Warring States Period". Finally, it casts in sharp relief the features of the Chinese historical accounts of Liang Qichao, while comparing the Chinese history discourse of Naitō Konan(内藤湖南), which is widely known through the "Tang-Sung Transition, Modern Sung Dynasty(唐宋変革、宋代近世)" discourse (in short, there was a great transition between the Tang and Sung Dynasties, and the period after the Sung Dynasty is taken as the Modern Period).
著者
朱 琳
出版者
神奈川大学人文学研究所
雑誌
人文学研究所報 (ISSN:02877082)
巻号頁・発行日
no.53, pp.87-115, 2015-03

Taking its cue from the three "encounters" in the acceptance of an evolutionary theory, using the evolution of "despotism" and the basis of "politics" as keywords, this paper focuses on the Chinese historical accounts of Liang Qichao(梁啓超), which has not been systematically considered up to now, and aims to clarify the features thereof. Firstly, it analyzes in detail the three "encounters" of Kang Youwei(康有為)ʼs "The Thesis on the Three Stages to Datong(大同)", Yan Fu(厳復)ʼs "Evolution Theory(天演論)", and the evolutionary theory via Japan. Next, it clarifies the concrete application to the Chinese history, as well as the diagram of political system evolution presented by Liang Qichao. Furthermore, it considers the proposed new world view based on such application, and the discourse on "The Second Warring States Period". Finally, it casts in sharp relief the features of the Chinese historical accounts of Liang Qichao, while comparing the Chinese history discourse of Naitō Konan(内藤湖南), which is widely known through the "Tang-Sung Transition, Modern Sung Dynasty(唐宋変革,宋代近世)" discourse(in short, there was a great transition between the Tang and Sung Dynasties, and the period after the Sung Dynasty is taken as the Modern Period).
著者
朱 琳
出版者
関西大学文化交渉学教育研究拠点(ICIS)
雑誌
東アジア文化交渉研究 (ISSN:18827748)
巻号頁・発行日
no.4, pp.193-212, 2011-03

This essay focuses on Liang Qichao( 1873-1929) and the significance of his role in the use of the word "civilization" 文明, a term that entered China from Japan and reflects Meiji-period modernity and values. Pursuing his cognizance of "civilization" as well as the changes in his understanding of this term, this research is the first in-depth investigation and explanation of Liang's entire view of "civilization". The first to be considered is Liang's theories of environmental determinism and ethnography, both of which reflect Liang's reception of "civilization" and the influence of Meiji Japan. This is followed with an analysis of Liang's speech and conduct in the East- West Cultural Debate, something in which he threw himself whole-heartedly after seeing the scars of war during a tour of the West. Finally, this author touches upon his unstable personality and appeal of his opinions
著者
朱 琳
出版者
関西大学文化交渉学教育研究拠点(ICIS)
雑誌
東アジア文化交渉研究 = Journal of East Asian Cultural Interaction Studies (ISSN:18827748)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.4, pp.193-212, 2011-03-31

This essay focuses on Liang Qichao( 1873-1929) and the significance of his role in the use of the word “civilization” 文明, a term that entered China from Japan and reflects Meiji-period modernity and values. Pursuing his cognizance of “civilization” as well as the changes in his understanding of this term, this research is the first in-depth investigation and explanation of Liang’s entire view of “civilization”. The first to be considered is Liang’s theories of environmental determinism and ethnography, both of which reflect Liang’s reception of “civilization” and the influence of Meiji Japan. This is followed with an analysis of Liang’s speech and conduct in the East- West Cultural Debate, something in which he threw himself whole-heartedly after seeing the scars of war during a tour of the West. Finally, this author touches upon his unstable personality and appeal of his opinions