著者
五賀 友継 松尾 牧則
出版者
日本武道学会
雑誌
武道学研究 (ISSN:02879700)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.52, no.2, pp.57-72, 2020-03-31 (Released:2020-08-26)
参考文献数
80

The aim of this study was to consider the transition period and reasons for the name change from “kyujutsu” to “kyudo” in school kyudo clubs and publications, when the word “kyudo” appeared, and what was thought to be the differences between it and “kyujutsu”.Firstly, the transition period from “kyujutsu club” to “kyudo club” in school kyudo clubs’ names was analyzed. Starting with the renaming at Daihachi Senior High School in 1911, the transition started to gather momentum in 1919, and by 1932, the transition was almost fully underway. However, the transition to “kyudo club” was never fully completed, and from studying the transition periods at respective schools, it was difficult to determine any uniform policy or specific trends. On the other hand, with respect to publications of that period, it was possible to confirm the attempt to transition from “kyujutsu” to “kyudo” from Gendai no Kyudo published in 1918, but not locate any use of the term “kyujutsu” after the publication of Yumi (1933). By juxtaposing the renaming of kyudo clubs in schools with the transition period of publications, the transition from “kyujutsu” to “kyudo” roughly took place in the 15-year period from 1918 to 1933.Next, it was found that the reason behind the transition from “kyujutsu” to “kyudo” was to place an emphasis on the art’s spiritual aspects. However, there were differences in the opinions of kyudo archers regarding the specific details of such spiritual aspects, as well as their importance relative to physical and technical aspects. As such, it was found that a variety of differences had emerged in terms of the practitioners’ conception of kyudo, as well as their ideal training methods and means of assessment.The transition period from “kyujutsu” to “kyudo”, and the reasons behind it, differ from those of the transitions from “bujutsu” to “budo”, as well as from “jujutsu” and “kenjutsu (gekiken)” to “judo” and “kendo” as presented in the From Jutsu to Do research. What sets kyudo apart includes the fact that some kyujutsu clubs remained and the term “kyudo” was not necessarily always enforced, as well as the suggestion by some that kyujutsu is essentially a part of kyudo.
著者
五賀 友継 松尾 牧則
出版者
日本武道学会
雑誌
武道学研究 (ISSN:02879700)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.51, no.2, pp.89-99, 2018-12-28 (Released:2019-12-28)
参考文献数
54

The aim of this study was to consider the influence of “Medical Research on Kyudo”, which was conducted by surgeons in Tokyo Provisional First Army Hospital from 1939 to 1941, and which subsequently lead to the dissolution of Kyudoyosoku. This research also looks to clarify the sequence of events during that period from historical records, research contents, and the reaction of archers after the publication of “Medical Research on Kyudo”. The results can be summarized as follows:1) Kyudo was adopted at the Tokyo Provisional First Army Hospital in 1939 as part of a rehabilitation program for disabled veterans with the aim of not only restoring military spirit, but also improving body posture.2) Following the adoption of kyudo, Tokyo Provisional First Army Hospital began the “Medical Research on Kyudo” project to select the most suitable kyudo forms to aid rehabilitation. Impact on the lungs and spinal cord were examined by radiographing the chest of the archers while performing the techniques of chukan-uchiokoshi and shomen-uchiokoshi. The research concluded that skeletal deformity and chest muscle distortion could occur with the chukan-uchiokoshi style. Moreover, the research assumed that incorrect lung position could trigger the risk of pleural inflammation and several diseases with chukan-uchiokoshi, but not with shomen-uchiokoshi.3) The results of the research study were widely publicized in kyudo and budo magazines, medical academic papers, newspapers and presentations not only for the kyudo archers, but also for the general public. This widespread dissemination of information also lead to the criticism of Kyudoyosoku from outside the kyudo field. This intensified pressure on the Greater Japan Martial Virtues Association, which had adopted chukan-uchiokoshi in Kyudoyosoku, to announce a strong statement denying the research on August 22, 1941.4) In our research, we could not confirm any other cases where the Greater Japan Martial Virtues Association got into such a situation as this to give a statement against criticism of kyudo’s essential rule. Therefore, it is conceivable that “Medical Research on Kyudo” gave validity or medical justification to criticize Kyudoyosoku. Taken together, the overall criticism from kyudo archers, budo martial artists, doctors, and society in general, and specifically the results from the “Medical Research on Kyudo” that indicated harm to the human body, was one of the main factors that lead to the elimination of the kyudo rationale, or the dissolution of Kyudoyosoku.
著者
森 俊男 細谷 聡 松尾 牧則
出版者
日本武道学会
雑誌
武道学研究 (ISSN:02879700)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.21, no.2, pp.67-68, 1988-11-30 (Released:2012-11-27)
参考文献数
3
著者
五賀 友継 洪 子甯 松尾 牧則
出版者
日本武道学会
雑誌
武道学研究 (ISSN:02879700)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.54, no.2, pp.87-102, 2022-03-31 (Released:2022-04-07)
参考文献数
90

The aim of this study was to clarify how kyudo was introduced and disseminated in Taiwan during the period of Japanese rule from 1895 to 1945.The first approach in investigating how kyudo began in Taiwan was by analyzing the local newspaper articles published during the period. It was found that the very first “Daikyujo” was established in Taipei in 1896, where kyudo activities first appeared. Some of the “Daikyujo” in this early period were for the purpose of physical exercise and training, while others were similar to “Yabaeigyo”, where the customers were charged to do kyudo as a form of entertainment.Next, understanding how the foundation was laid for the spread of kyudo in Taiwan was conducted by researching the role that the Dai Nippon Butoku Kai (DNBK) and the Dai Nippon Kyudo Kai (DNKK) played at the time. In the Taiwan branch of DNBK, the department of kyujutsu was established at the Taipei Chihou Iinbu (Taipei Regional Committee), which was the predecessor of the Taiwan branch of the DNBK, in 1901. This marked the beginning of kyudo practice on the island. However, the kyujutsu department was transferred out of the DNBK to Taiiku Club in 1903 and was temporarily separated from the DNBK. After the dissolution of Taiiku Club in 1916, it returned to the DNBK. Around the same time, the DNKK established its first branch in Takao (Kaohsiung) in 1915, but local promotion activities only began in earnest from 1924, after the visit of Kako NEYA, the founder of the DNKK. Subsequently, Seiko OIZUMI, a master of the DNKK, was stationed in Taiwan and further promoted the spread of kyudo.Lastly, the geographical locations and establishment timeline of the Kyudo group, mainly established by the DNBK and DNKK in Taiwan over the period of Japanese rule, were analyzed to identify the extent of the spread of kyudo in the region at the time. It was found that Kyudo group was not only established in urban areas on the west coast of the main island, but also on the less populated east coast, central mountainous areas, and remote islands. In particular, the DNKK accounts for 30% of the kyudo groups in total. On the other hand, it was not clear whether the DNBK had successfully spread to those regions. In addition, it was observed that a high concentration of kyudo organizations established in southern Taiwan were affiliated with the sugar industry. Besides the DNBK and DNKK, the Dai Nippon Shakakuin was another kyudo organization that had its branch in Taipei, but its influence was limited.
著者
大熊 燦雨 松尾 牧則 村井 友樹
出版者
筑波大学
雑誌
基盤研究(B)
巻号頁・発行日
2018-04-01

本研究は、東アジアに跨る武文化の固有性と相似性の解明に向け、文禄・慶長の役(萬暦朝鮮之役、壬辰倭乱:1592~1598年)を通して披露された日本・中国・韓国武術が、近世東アジアの武文化に与えた影響を実証的に検討することを目的としている。そのために、2019年度には、以下のような研究活動を行いに、主に日中韓武文化の交流の痕跡を物語る資料を網羅的に検討・収集した。1.先行研究の検討及び関連資料収集:400年前に起きたアジア最大の戦争であった文禄・慶長の役に関しては、その歴史や波及力の故に多方面で数多くの研究が行われてきた。そのため、前年度に引き続き多岐にわたり先行研究を含めた文禄・慶長の役に関する膨大な2次史料を検討し、本課題と関連する日本側の史資料の収集に努めた。また、それを基に、文禄・慶長の役にまつわる武に関する1次史料の範囲を絞り、その収集に努めた。2.史資料の分析:収集した日本側の関連史資料の整理・解読を進めながら、先行研究で言及された既存史料との比較検討を行い、当該戦争に対する全体像の把握に努めながら日韓武文化交流の痕跡を浮き彫りにした。3.台湾側の情報収集及び史料調査:台湾の台東大学・高雄大学等を訪問し、研究者と意見交換しながら情報収集に努め、また、台湾における武術研究の現在把握と中国武術に関する史料・情報を収集した。4.情報収集及び成果発表:東北アジア体育・スポーツ史学会、体育史学会、日本体育学会、国際体育・スポーツ史学会、筑波大学体育史研究会などの国内・国際学会に参加し研究協力者との情報交換を行い、また、Northeast Asian Society for History of Physical Education and Sport学会の定例Conferenceにて研究成果の一部を発表し、学会会員との意見交換など更なる情報収集に努めた。
著者
五賀 友継 洪 子甯 松尾 牧則
出版者
日本武道学会
雑誌
武道学研究 (ISSN:02879700)
巻号頁・発行日
pp.2107, (Released:2021-12-15)
参考文献数
90

The aim of this study was to clarify how kyudo was introduced and disseminated in Taiwan during the period of Japanese rule from 1895 to 1945.The first approach in investigating how kyudo began in Taiwan was by analyzing the local newspaper articles published during the period. It was found that the very first “Daikyujo” was established in Taipei in 1896, where kyudo activities first appeared. Some of the “Daikyujo” in this early period were for the purpose of physical exercise and training, while others were similar to “Yabaeigyo”, where the customers were charged to do kyudo as a form of entertainment.Next, understanding how the foundation was laid for the spread of kyudo in Taiwan was conducted by researching the role that the Dai Nippon Butoku Kai (DNBK) and the Dai Nippon Kyudo Kai (DNKK) played at the time. In the Taiwan branch of DNBK, the department of kyujutsu was established at the Taipei Chihou Iinbu (Taipei Regional Committee), which was the predecessor of the Taiwan branch of the DNBK, in 1901. This marked the beginning of kyudo practice on the island. However, the kyujutsu department was transferred out of the DNBK to Taiiku Club in 1903 and was temporarily separated from the DNBK. After the dissolution of Taiiku Club in 1916, it returned to the DNBK. Around the same time, the DNKK established its first branch in Takao (Kaohsiung) in 1915, but local promotion activities only began in earnest from 1924, after the visit of Kako NEYA, the founder of the DNKK. Subsequently, Seiko OIZUMI, a master of the DNKK, was stationed in Taiwan and further promoted the spread of kyudo.Lastly, the geographical locations and establishment timeline of the Kyudo group, mainly established by the DNBK and DNKK in Taiwan over the period of Japanese rule, were analyzed to identify the extent of the spread of kyudo in the region at the time. It was found that Kyudo group was not only established in urban areas on the west coast of the main island, but also on the less populated east coast, central mountainous areas, and remote islands. In particular, the DNKK accounts for 30% of the kyudo groups in total. On the other hand, it was not clear whether the DNBK had successfully spread to those regions. In addition, it was observed that a high concentration of kyudo organizations established in southern Taiwan were affiliated with the sugar industry. Besides the DNBK and DNKK, the Dai Nippon Shakakuin was another kyudo organization that had its branch in Taipei, but its influence was limited.
著者
松尾 牧則 入江 康平
出版者
日本武道学会
雑誌
武道学研究 (ISSN:02879700)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.21, no.2, pp.65-66, 1988-11-30 (Released:2012-11-27)
参考文献数
7