著者

Tohru Masuyama Takeshi Tsujino Hideki Origasa Kazuhiro Yamamoto Takashi Akasaka Yutaka Hirano Nobuyuki Ohte Takashi Daimon Satoshi Nakatani Hiroshi Ito

出版者

The Japanese Circulation Society

雑誌

Circulation Journal (ISSN:13469843)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.76, no.4, pp.833-842, 2012 (Released:2012-03-23)

参考文献数

30

被引用文献数

46 49

---

Background: Diuretics are the most prescribed drug in heart failure (HF) patients. However, clinical evidence about their long-term effects is lacking. The purpose of this study was to compare the therapeutic effects of furosemide and azosemide, a short- and long-acting loop diuretic, respectively, in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Methods and Results: In this multicenter, prospective, randomized, open, blinded endpoint trial, we compared the effects of azosemide and furosemide in patients with CHF and New York Heart Association class II or III symptoms. 320 patients (160 patients in each group, mean age 71 years) were followed up for a minimum of 2 years. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death or unplanned admission to hospital for congestive HF. During a median follow-up of 35.2 months, the primary endpoint occurred in 23 patients in the azosemide group and in 34 patients in the furosemide group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.95: P=0.03). Among the secondary endpoints, unplanned admission to hospital for congestive HF or a need for modification of the treatment for HF were also reduced in the azosemide group compared with the furosemide group (HR, 0.60, 95%CI 0.36-0.99: P=0.048). Conclusions: Azosemide, compared with furosemide, reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or unplanned admission to hospital for congestive HF. (Circ J 2012; 76: 833-842)

著者

Hiroshi YAMADA Takashi DAIMON Katsuhiko MATSUDA Masayuki YOSHIDA Norikata TAKUMA Yukihiko HARA

出版者

The Japanese Society of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics

雑誌

臨床薬理 (ISSN:03881601)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.38, no.5, pp.323-330, 2007-09-30 (Released:2008-10-31)

参考文献数

30

被引用文献数

11 14

---

Experimental studies have revealed that tea catechins prevent influenza virus infection ; however, the clinical effects have been inconclusive. At the onset of the influenza season, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted from December 2005 to March 2006 in Japan. A total of 404 healthy volunteers, 20-65 years of age, were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups : the catechin group gargling with tea catechin extract solution (approximately 400 μg/mL catechins) or the placebo group gargling without tea catechin extracts. In both groups, gargling was performed three times daily for 90 days. All participants were inoculated with the influenza vaccine before participating in the study. The primary outcome measure was the incidence rate of influenza infection during the study identified by a rapid assay for influenza virus antigens. On an intention to treat basis, 195 participants in the catechin group and 200 in the placebo group who started the intervention were included in the analysis. Of the participants, 6 (1.5%) were infected with influenza. The incidence rate of influenza infection in the catechin group (1.0%, 2 participants) was half that in the control group (2.0%, 4 participants), but not significant between the two groups. We could not find significant effects of gargling with tea catechin on prevention of influenza in the healthy adults inoculated with the influenza vaccine of the 2005-2006 season. However, the effects in more susceptible groups, i.e., those not vaccinated against the influenza virus, children, elderly or immunosuppressed people remain inconclusive.

著者

Tsuyoshi Shiga Takanori Ikeda Wataru Shimizu Koichiro Kinugawa Atsuhiro Sakamoto Ryozo Nagai Takashi Daimon Kaori Oki Haruka Okamoto Takeshi Yamashita

出版者

The Japanese Circulation Society

雑誌

Circulation Reports (ISSN:24340790)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.2, no.8, pp.440-445, 2020-08-07 (Released:2020-08-07)

参考文献数

13

被引用文献数

5

---

Background:Post hoc analysis was used to investigate the effects of renal function on the efficacy and safety of landiolol using data from the J-Land II study, which evaluated landiolol in patients with hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) who were refractory to Class III antiarrhythmic drugs.Methods and Results:Patient data from the J-Land II study (n=29) were stratified by renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <45 and ≥45 mL/min/1.73 m2) and analyzed. Continuous landiolol infusion (1 μg/kg/min, i.v.) was initiated after VT/VF was suppressed with electrical defibrillation; subsequent dose adjustments were made (1–40 μg/kg/min). The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients free from recurrent VT/VF during the assessment period. Safety endpoints were also assessed. In the eGFR <45 and ≥45 mL/min/1.73 m2groups, the median doses of landiolol during the assessment period were 9.44 and 8.97 μg/kg/min, the proportions of patients free from recurrent VT/VF were 69.2% and 81.8%, and adverse events occurred in 9 and 10 of 13 patients in each group, respectively. There were no apparent differences in the efficacy or safety of landiolol between the 2 groups.Conclusions:The data suggest that renal function may not affect the efficacy and safety of landiolol for hemodynamically unstable VT or VF.

著者

Takanori Ikeda Tsuyoshi Shiga Wataru Shimizu Koichiro Kinugawa Atsuhiro Sakamoto Ryozo Nagai Takashi Daimon Kaori Oki Haruka Okamoto Takeshi Yamashita The J-Land II Study Investigators

出版者

The Japanese Circulation Society

雑誌

Circulation Journal (ISSN:13469843)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.83, no.7, pp.1456-1462, 2019-06-25 (Released:2019-06-25)

参考文献数

9

被引用文献数

18

---

Background:We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of landiolol in Japanese patients with recurrent hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia or recurrent ventricular fibrillation (recurrent VT/VF).Methods and Results:This was an open-label, uncontrolled, multicenter study. Patients with hemodynamically unstable VT or VF 24 h prior to providing informed consent, and who were refractory to class III antiarrhythmic drugs, were enrolled. Landiolol was started at a dose of 1 μg/kg/min, after VT/VF was suppressed with electrical defibrillation. Landiolol was titrated up to 10 μg/kg/min in 1 h and adjusted between 1 and 40 μg/kg/min for the efficacy assessment (1–49 h). The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients free from recurrent VT/VF. Secondary efficacy endpoints included the number of recurrent VT/VF events and the survival rate 30 days after the start of landiolol treatment. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed for safety; 27 and 29 patients were analyzed for efficacy and safety, respectively. The proportion of patients free from recurrent VT/VF was 77.8% (95% CI 57.1–89.3). The mean (±standard deviation) number of recurrent VT/VF events was 9.3±7.9. The survival rate was 96.3%. The overall incidence of AEs and of serious AEs was 72.4% and 6.9%, respectively.Conclusions:Landiolol may be useful for Japanese patients with recurrent VT/VF who do not respond to class III antiarrhythmic drugs.

著者

Ryozo Nagai Koichiro Kinugawa Hiroshi Inoue Hirotsugu Atarashi Yoshihiko Seino Takeshi Yamashita Wataru Shimizu Takeshi Aiba Masafumi Kitakaze Atsuhiro Sakamoto Takanori Ikeda Yasushi Imai Takashi Daimon Katsuhiro Fujino Tetsuji Nagano Tatsuaki Okamura Masatsugu Hori the J-Land Investigators

出版者

日本循環器学会

雑誌

Circulation Journal (ISSN:13469843)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.77, no.4, pp.908-916, 2013 (Released:2013-03-25)

参考文献数

24

被引用文献数

21 93

---

Background: A rapid heart rate (HR) during atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) in left ventricular (LV) dysfunction often impairs cardiac performance. The J-Land study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of landiolol, an ultra-short-acting β-blocker, with those of digoxin for swift control of tachycardia in AF/AFL in patients with LV dysfunction. Methods and Results: The 200 patients with AF/AFL, HR ≥120beats/min, and LV ejection fraction 25–50% were randomized to receive either landiolol (n=93) or digoxin (n=107). Successful HR control was defined as ≥20% reduction in HR together with HR <110beats/min at 2h after starting intravenous administration of landiolol or digoxin. The dose of landiolol was adjusted in the range of 1–10μg·kg–1·min–1 according to the patient’s condition. The mean HR at baseline was 138.2±15.7 and 138.0±15.0beats/min in the landiolol and digoxin groups, respectively. Successful HR control was achieved in 48.0% of patients treated with landiolol and in 13.9% of patients treated with digoxin (P<0.0001). Serious adverse events were reported in 2 and 3 patients in each group, respectively. Conclusions: Landiolol was more effective for controlling rapid HR than digoxin in AF/AFL patients with LV dysfunction, and could be considered as a therapeutic option in this clinical setting.  (Circ J 2013; 77: 908–916)

著者

Ryozo Nagai Koichiro Kinugawa Hiroshi Inoue Hirotsugu Atarashi Yoshihiko Seino Takeshi Yamashita Wataru Shimizu Takeshi Aiba Masafumi Kitakaze Atsuhiro Sakamoto Takanori Ikeda Yasushi Imai Takashi Daimon Katsuhiro Fujino Tetsuji Nagano Tatsuaki Okamura Masatsugu Hori the J-Land Investigators

出版者

日本循環器学会

雑誌

Circulation Journal (ISSN:13469843)

巻号頁・発行日

pp.CJ-12-1618, (Released:2013-03-15)

参考文献数

24

被引用文献数

21 93

---

Background: A rapid heart rate (HR) during atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) in left ventricular (LV) dysfunction often impairs cardiac performance. The J-Land study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of landiolol, an ultra-short-acting β-blocker, with those of digoxin for swift control of tachycardia in AF/AFL in patients with LV dysfunction. Methods and Results: The 200 patients with AF/AFL, HR ≥120beats/min, and LV ejection fraction 25–50% were randomized to receive either landiolol (n=93) or digoxin (n=107). Successful HR control was defined as ≥20% reduction in HR together with HR <110beats/min at 2h after starting intravenous administration of landiolol or digoxin. The dose of landiolol was adjusted in the range of 1–10μg·kg–1·min–1 according to the patient’s condition. The mean HR at baseline was 138.2±15.7 and 138.0±15.0beats/min in the landiolol and digoxin groups, respectively. Successful HR control was achieved in 48.0% of patients treated with landiolol and in 13.9% of patients treated with digoxin (P<0.0001). Serious adverse events were reported in 2 and 3 patients in each group, respectively. Conclusions: Landiolol was more effective for controlling rapid HR than digoxin in AF/AFL patients with LV dysfunction, and could be considered as a therapeutic option in this clinical setting.