著者

Tohru Masuyama Takeshi Tsujino Hideki Origasa Kazuhiro Yamamoto Takashi Akasaka Yutaka Hirano Nobuyuki Ohte Takashi Daimon Satoshi Nakatani Hiroshi Ito

出版者

The Japanese Circulation Society

雑誌

Circulation Journal (ISSN:13469843)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.76, no.4, pp.833-842, 2012 (Released:2012-03-23)

参考文献数

30

被引用文献数

46 49

---

Background: Diuretics are the most prescribed drug in heart failure (HF) patients. However, clinical evidence about their long-term effects is lacking. The purpose of this study was to compare the therapeutic effects of furosemide and azosemide, a short- and long-acting loop diuretic, respectively, in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Methods and Results: In this multicenter, prospective, randomized, open, blinded endpoint trial, we compared the effects of azosemide and furosemide in patients with CHF and New York Heart Association class II or III symptoms. 320 patients (160 patients in each group, mean age 71 years) were followed up for a minimum of 2 years. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death or unplanned admission to hospital for congestive HF. During a median follow-up of 35.2 months, the primary endpoint occurred in 23 patients in the azosemide group and in 34 patients in the furosemide group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.95: P=0.03). Among the secondary endpoints, unplanned admission to hospital for congestive HF or a need for modification of the treatment for HF were also reduced in the azosemide group compared with the furosemide group (HR, 0.60, 95%CI 0.36-0.99: P=0.048). Conclusions: Azosemide, compared with furosemide, reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or unplanned admission to hospital for congestive HF. (Circ J 2012; 76: 833-842)

著者

Yasuaki Takeji Tomohiko Taniguchi Takeshi Morimoto Naritatsu Saito Kenji Ando Shinichi Shirai Genichi Sakaguchi Yoshio Arai Yasushi Fuku Yuichi Kawase Tatsuhiko Komiya Natsuhiko Ehara Takeshi Kitai Tadaaki Koyama Shin Watanabe Hirotoshi Watanabe Hiroki Shiomi Eri Minamino-Muta Shintaro Matsuda Hidenori Yaku Yusuke Yoshikawa Kazuhiro Yamazaki Masahide Kawatou Kazuhisa Sakamoto Toshihiro Tamura Makoto Miyake Hisashi Sakaguchi Koichiro Murata Masanao Nakai Norio Kanamori Chisato Izumi Hirokazu Mitsuoka Masashi Kato Yutaka Hirano Tsukasa Inada Kazuya Nagao Hiroshi Mabuchi Yasuyo Takeuchi Keiichiro Yamane Takashi Tamura Mamoru Toyofuku Mitsuru Ishii Moriaki Inoko Tomoyuki Ikeda Katsuhisa Ishii Kozo Hotta Toshikazu Jinnai Nobuya Higashitani Yoshihiro Kato Yasutaka Inuzuka Yuko Morikami Kenji Minatoya Takeshi Kimura on befalf of the CURRENT AS Registry Investigators and K-TAVI Registry Investigators

出版者

The Japanese Circulation Society

雑誌

Circulation Journal (ISSN:13469843)

巻号頁・発行日

pp.CJ-19-0951, (Released:2020-02-01)

参考文献数

35

被引用文献数

12

---

Background:There are no data comparing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) outcomes in real clinical practice in Japan.Methods and Results:We combined 2 independent registries, the K-TAVI Registry (a 6-center prospective registry of consecutive patients who underwent TAVI) and the CURRENT AS Registry (a large, 27-center registry of 3,815 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis [AS]). In the K-TAVI Registry, 338 patients underwent TAVI with SAPIEN XT balloon-expandable valves from October 2013 to January 2016, whereas in the CURRENT AS Registry 237 patients with severe AS underwent SAVR from January 2003 to December 2011. Propensity score matching was conducted, with final cohort comprising 306 patients. The cumulative 2-year incidence of all-cause death and heart failure (HF) hospitalization did not differ significantly between the TAVI and SAVR groups (13.7% vs. 12.4% [P=0.81] and 7.9% vs 3.9% [P=0.13], respectively). After adjusting for residual confounders, there were no significant differences between the TAVI and SAVR groups in the risk for all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35–1.58; P=0.43) or HF hospitalization (HR 1.27; 95% CI 0.40–4.59; P=0.69).Conclusions:These findings from 2 independent Japanese registries suggest that the 2-year risk of all-cause mortality and HF does not differ significantly between TAVI and SAVR groups in real-world practice in Japan.

著者

Ryosuke Murai Yuichi Kawase Tomohiko Taniguchi Takeshi Morimoto Kazushige Kadota Masanobu Ohya Takenobu Shimada Takeshi Maruo Yasushi Fuku Tatsuhiko Komiya Kenji Ando Michiya Hanyu Norio Kanamori Takeshi Aoyama Koichiro Murata Tomoya Onodera Fumio Yamazaki Takeshi Kitai Yutaka Furukawa Tadaaki Koyama Makoto Miyake Chisato Izumi Yoshihisa Nakagawa Kazuo Yamanaka Hirokazu Mitsuoka Manabu Shirotani Masashi Kato Shinji Miki Hiroyuki Nakajima Yutaka Hirano Shunichi Miyazaki Toshihiko Saga Sachiko Sugioka Shintaro Matsuda Mitsuo Matsuda Tatsuya Ogawa Kazuya Nagao Tsukasa Inada Shogo Nakayama Hiroshi Mabuchi Yasuyo Takeuchi Hiroki Sakamoto Genichi Sakaguchi Keiichiro Yamane Hiroshi Eizawa Mamoru Toyofuku Takashi Tamura Atsushi Iwakura Mitsuru Ishii Masaharu Akao Kotaro Shiraga Eri Minamino-Muta Takao Kato Moriaki Inoko Koji Ueyama Tomoyuki Ikeda Yoshihiro Himura Akihiro Komasa Katsuhisa Ishii Kozo Hotta Yukihito Sato Keiichi Fujiwara Yoshihiro Kato Ichiro Kouchi Yasutaka Inuzuka Shigeru Ikeguchi Senri Miwa Chiyo Maeda Eiji Shinoda Junichiro Nishizawa Toshikazu Jinnai Nobuya Higashitani Mitsuru Kitano Yuko Morikami Shouji Kitaguchi Kenji Minatoya Takeshi Kimura on behalf of the CURRENT AS Registry Investigators

出版者

The Japanese Circulation Society

雑誌

Circulation Journal (ISSN:13469843)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.86, no.3, pp.427-437, 2022-02-25 (Released:2022-02-25)

参考文献数

26

被引用文献数

3

---

Background:The clinical significance of concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR) has not been well addressed in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS).Methods and Results:We analyzed 3,815 patients from a retrospective multicenter registry of severe AS in Japan (CURRENT AS registry). We compared the clinical outcomes between patients with moderate/severe MR and with none/mild MR according to the initial treatment strategy (initial aortic valve replacement [AVR] or conservative strategy). The primary outcome measure was a composite of aortic valve-related death or heart failure hospitalization. At baseline, moderate/severe MR was present in 227/1,197 (19%) patients with initial AVR strategy and in 536/2,618 (20%) patients with a conservative strategy. The crude cumulative 5-year incidence of the primary outcome measure was significantly higher in patients with moderate/severe MR than in those with none/mild MR, regardless of the initial treatment strategy (25.2% vs. 14.4%, P<0.001 in the initial AVR strategy, and 63.3% vs. 40.7%, P<0.001 in the conservative strategy). After adjusting confounders, moderate/severe MR was not independently associated with higher risk for the primary outcome measure in the initial AVR strategy (hazard ratio [HR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67–1.83, P=0.69), and in the conservative strategy (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.93–1.37, P=0.22).Conclusions:Concomitant moderate/severe MR was not independently associated with higher risk for the primary outcome measure regardless of the initial treatment strategy.

著者

Mamoru Toyofuku Tomohiko Taniguchi Takeshi Morimoto Kyohei Yamaji Yutaka Furukawa Kosuke Takahashi Takashi Tamura Hiroki Shiomi Kenji Ando Norio Kanamori Koichiro Murata Takeshi Kitai Yuichi Kawase Chisato Izumi Makoto Miyake Hirokazu Mitsuoka Masashi Kato Yutaka Hirano Shintaro Matsuda Tsukasa Inada Tomoyuki Murakami Yasuyo Takeuchi Keiichiro Yamane Mitsuru Ishii Eri Minamino-Muta Takao Kato Moriaki Inoko Tomoyuki Ikeda Akihiro Komasa Katsuhisa Ishii Kozo Hotta Nobuya Higashitani Yoshihiro Kato Yasutaka Inuzuka Chiyo Maeda Toshikazu Jinnai Yuko Morikami Naritatsu Saito Kenji Minatoya Takeshi Kimura on behalf of the CURRENT AS Registry Investigators

出版者

日本循環器学会

雑誌

Circulation Journal (ISSN:13469843)

巻号頁・発行日

pp.CJ-16-1244, (Released:2017-04-08)

参考文献数

23

被引用文献数

34

---

Background:There is a paucity of data on the sex differences in the prevalence, clinical presentation, and prognosis of aortic stenosis (AS).Methods and Results:A total of 3,815 consecutive patients with severe AS were enrolled in the multicenter CURRENT AS registry between January 2003 and December 2011. The registry included 1,443 men (38%) and 2,372 women (62%). Women were much older than men (79±10 vs. 75±10 years, P<0.0001), and the ratio of women to men increased with age. The cumulative 5-year incidence of all-cause death was significantly higher in men than in women (47% vs. 41%, P=0.003), although women were more symptomatic and much older. The 5-year mortality was similar between men and women at age <65 years (16% vs. 15%, P=0.99), whereas it was significantly higher in men than in women at age ≥65 years (65–74 years, 38% vs. 19%, P<0.0001; 75–84 years, 55% vs. 34%, P<0.0001; ≥85 years: 82% vs. 72%, P=0.03).Conclusions:A large Japanese multicenter registry of consecutive patients with severe AS included a much higher proportion of women than men, with the female:male sex ratio increasing with age. The 5-year mortality rate of women was lower than that of men. Lower 5-year mortality rates in women were consistently seen across all age groups >65 years.