文献一覧: 関学西洋史論集 (雑誌)

2 0 0 0 OA <研究ノート>ハプスブルクの「忘れられた植民地(?)」 : ボスニア・ヘルツェゴヴィナ統治(1878-1918)をめぐる研究動向

著者: 村上亮 Ryo Murakami
雑誌: 関学西洋史論集 (ISSN:03860043)
巻号頁・発行日: no.36, pp.53-66, 2013-03-25

http://hdl.handle.net/10236/12805

1 0 0 0 OA <欧米歴史散歩>幻のリシュリュー城

著者: 阿河雄二郎 Yujiro Aga
雑誌: 関学西洋史論集 (ISSN:03860043)
巻号頁・発行日: no.36, pp.67-72, 2013-03-25

2023-04-26 19:37:39
1 + 0 Twitter

http://hdl.handle.net/10236/12806

1 0 0 0 OA <シンポジウム>「問いかけ」から始まる歴史の授業

著者: 笹川裕史 Hiroshi Sasagawa
雑誌: 関学西洋史論集 (ISSN:03860043)
巻号頁・発行日: no.42, pp.33-48, 2019-03-31

2022-10-24 20:38:34
1 + 2 Twitter

http://hdl.handle.net/10236/00027773

1 0 0 0 OA オリエンタリズム批評のあとさき : 原点としての『エジプト誌Description de l’Egypte』

著者: 杉本淑彦 Yoshihiko Sugimoto
雑誌: 関学西洋史論集 (ISSN:03860043)
巻号頁・発行日: no.45, pp.1-27, 2022-03-31

2022-05-22 15:28:24
1 + 5 Twitter

http://hdl.handle.net/10236/00030102

1 0 0 0 IR <研究動向>「ケルト」とは何か

著者: 九鬼由紀 Yuki Kuki
雑誌: 関学西洋史論集 (ISSN:03860043)
巻号頁・発行日: no.43, pp.71-94, 2020-03-31

2021-07-25 12:54:22
1 + 1 Twitter

https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/120006824338

1 0 0 0 IR デンマークの国際商業と「海洋帝国」のかたち

著者: 井上光子 Mitsuko Inoue
出版者: 関学西洋史研究会
雑誌: 関学西洋史論集 (ISSN:03860043)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.32, pp.21-31, 2009-03

2021-06-26 15:06:08
1 + 0 Twitter

https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/120005540978

1 0 0 0 OA <講演録>ボローニャ : 都市と大学の誕生と発展

著者: 山辺規子 Noriko Yamabe
雑誌: 関学西洋史論集 (ISSN:03860043)
巻号頁・発行日: no.43, pp.39-70, 2020-03-31

2020-05-06 06:19:28
1 + 0 Twitter

http://hdl.handle.net/10236/00028525

1 0 0 0 IR 書評山田康博著『原爆投下をめぐるアメリカ政治 : 開発から使用までの内政・外交分析』

著者: 内輪雅史 Masashi Uchiwa
出版者: 関学西洋史研究会
雑誌: 関学西洋史論集 (ISSN:03860043)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.40, pp.51-55, 2017-03

2020-01-23 17:52:00
1 はてなブックマーク

https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/120006607191

1 0 0 0 IR 古代末期とは何か? : 現時点でその研究状況をふりかえる

著者: 足立広明 Hiroaki Adachi
出版者: 関学西洋史研究会
雑誌: 関学西洋史論集 (ISSN:03860043)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.40, pp.29-46, 2017-03

2019-11-24 22:40:08
1 + 4 Twitter

https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/120006607189

1 0 0 0 IR 近世フランスにおける女性相続人 (シンポジウムヨーロッパ近世貴族の家系意識)

著者: 滝澤聡子 Satoko Takizawa
出版者: 関学西洋史研究会
雑誌: 関学西洋史論集 (ISSN:03860043)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.33, pp.3-9, 2010-03

2019-07-14 10:42:04
1 + 0 Twitter

https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/120005540983

1 0 0 0 OA デンマークの国際商業と「海洋帝国」のかたち

著者: 井上光子 Mitsuko Inoue
雑誌: 関学西洋史論集 (ISSN:03860043)
巻号頁・発行日: no.32, pp.21-31, 2009-03-26

2018-11-10 10:54:12
1 + 0 Twitter

http://hdl.handle.net/10236/12878

1 0 0 0 OA <論文>重商主義時代のデンマークによる海上貿易ネットワーク

著者: 井上光子 Mitsuko Inoue
雑誌: 関学西洋史論集 (ISSN:03860043)
巻号頁・発行日: no.30, pp.25-36, 2007-03-27

2018-11-10 10:53:42
1 + 0 Twitter

http://hdl.handle.net/10236/1825

1 0 0 0 IR オーストリア=ハンガリーとアルバニア侯国の誕生(1912-1913年)

著者: 馬場優
出版者: 関西学院大学
雑誌: 関学西洋史論集 (ISSN:03860043)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.31, pp.37-50, 2008-03

Albania became independent from Ottoman Empire during the first Balkan War (October 1912-May 1913). This independence owed not only the independent movement of Albanian, but also the diplomacy of the European 6 Great Powers, in particular Austria-Hungary and Italy. They saw that they had the great interest in Albania. The Great Powers hold the "London Ambassadors Conference" on December 1912 to consult about the end of the Balkan War. The Conference decided in the name of the "Europe" that (1) Albania would be autonomous and neutral state and (2) Austria-Hungary and Italy should submit the general opinion about the Albanian organization to the Conference. For Austria-Hungary, Albania was the one of the important factor in the Balkan policy. In the end of the 19th Century we can find the same standpoint. In 1896 the policy-makers in Austria-Hungary decided that Albania should be autonomous state if man can not be maintain the territorial integration of Ottoman Empire in the Balkan, and they should be cooperate with Italy in order to take this policy. Albania was bulwark against the extension of Serbia and a wedge between Montenegro and Serbia. Austria-Hungary and Italy could accord the Albanian policy since 1897. So the attitude of the Austria-Hungary in 1912 was an extension of the traditional Balkan policy. The Autonomous Albania was for Austria-Hungary the bulwark against the expansion of Serbia, in particular advance to the Adriatic Sea. Austria-Hungary thought that Albania had to have the sovereignty in order to make Albania of independent state. Austria-Hungary and Italy started the consultation on the Albanian organization on December 1912 and finally they submitted to the Ambassador Conference on July 1913. The matter was; (1) Albania would be a principality whose prince was elected by the Great Powers. (2) The neutrality of Albania would be guaranteed by the 6 Great Powers. (3) The International Control Committee which consisted of 6 delegates of the Great Powers and 1 Albanian would work the civil and financial administration for 5 years. (4) The international gendarmerie would work the public order. Though the term of the action of the International Control Commission was changed to 10 years, this proposal was generally approved in the Ambassador Conference on 29th July 1913.