著者
山田 慎太郎 藤井 聡 宮川 愛由
出版者
人間環境学研究会
雑誌
人間環境学研究 (ISSN:13485253)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.14, no.2, pp.155-164, 2016 (Released:2017-01-06)

A referendum in a manner of direct democracy has been occasionally adopted in Japan for a political decision. However, it may not always maximize public interest, and it may thus lead failure. This referendum failure can easily emerge when those who insist a controversial policy, such as politicians who can benefit from the policy, use sophistry to justify the policy. This is because voters can not rationally judge the policy ouing to the sophistry. In this research we focus on politicians' remarks related to the referendum of "Osaka Metropolis Concept" of which voting day was 17th May, 2015 in Osaka City. We quantitatively analyzed remarks by 2 politicians, who are representative debaters in 2 major political parties in Twitter for a month (from 17th, April, 2015 to 17th, May, 2015), and remarks by them in a debate TV program casted in 12th, February, 2015. The result indicates that sophistry accounted for 33.9 % of the Twitter sentences and 48.0 % of the verbal sentences spoken by a politician who insisted the concept, whereas almost no sophistry (only 0.1 %) for the other politician. This result implies that there was risk that voters might not be able not rationally judge based on such frequent sophistry.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (7 users, 7 posts, 4 favorites)

政治家の政治的言説における詭弁に関する実証的研究 https://t.co/Fqkkq0jeAG
藤井教授研究室の学生が主著者の政治家の詭弁に関する論文 https://t.co/JIrZBuy7WJ よく書けているし面白い。流石京大。が、致命的なのは共著者の藤井教授の広義の利益相反(利害関係)が疑われる都構想、橋下氏、柳本氏を研究対象としていること。
@jerry_rigging もしお時間があれば以下の論文も参考にされてはいかがでしょうか。 政治家の政治的言説における詭弁に関する実証的研究 https://t.co/3An8zoMsJ2
承前6(論理的ウソ)に該当するものであったことも、発話分析の学術研究から明らかにされています(なお、その対抗論者の詭弁率はわずか2.6%) ※https://t.co/mu1IjuGYpr さらに橋下維新は、上記(事実1)(事実2… https://t.co/mcrqxcMH6p
詭弁濃度 https://t.co/BQ1rUABT1Q

収集済み URL リスト