著者

横山 友子 杉本 吉恵 中岡 亜希子 田中 結華 高辻 功一

出版者

日本看護技術学会

雑誌

日本看護技術学会誌 (ISSN:13495429)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.12, no.3, pp.24-33, 2014-01-20 (Released:2016-07-08)

参考文献数

30

---

洗浄剤を使用せずナノミストシャワーを用いた洗髪 (NMS) の有用性について,洗浄剤を用いた洗髪 (TS) と比較するため,健康な成人35名 (31±9歳) を対象に,NMSとTSの両方を実施した.有意水準は5%とした. ATP値では,NMSは洗髪前7381±7171RLUから洗髪後4317±3236RLUに,TSは7763±9977RLUから5921±1782RLUに有意に低下した.皮脂量では,NMSは洗髪前66±30から洗髪後11±9に,TSは93±2から4±2に有意に低下した.ATP値と皮脂量ともに両洗髪間に有意な差はなかった.洗浄感は,両洗髪間に有意な差はなかったが,NMSは「音」「爽快感」「におい」においてTSより有意に劣っていた.所要時間は,TSが8分45秒±1分22秒に対し,NMSは3分52秒±34秒で有意に短かった.使用湯量は,TSが18.5±2.2Lに対し,NMSは4.4±0.8Lで有意に少なかった. 以上より,NMSはTSと同程度の洗浄効果があり,少量の湯と短時間で洗髪できるため臨床での有用性が示唆された.

著者

香川 秀太 澁谷 幸 三谷 理恵 中岡 亜希子

出版者

日本認知科学会

雑誌

認知科学 (ISSN:13417924)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.23, no.4, pp.355-376, 2016-12

著者

香川 秀太 澁谷 幸 三谷 理恵 中岡 亜希子

出版者

日本認知科学会

雑誌

認知科学 (ISSN:13417924)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.23, no.4, pp.355-376, 2016-12-01 (Released:2017-05-31)

参考文献数

39

---

This study constituted action research that nurses and researchers tried to change a training system for novice nurses by building a community of dialogue that went beyond existing frameworks. First, we interviewed the administrator, clinical educa-tor, and preceptor who were concerned with newcomer education and the design of the training system, and we analyzed the differences or gaps among their perspectives. Second, we planned and tried a cross-boundary method whereby the nurses exchanged knowledge and created a new training system for newcomers, negotiating the bound-aries among wards or between researchers and hospital staff. The micro-process of creating new knowledge through dialogue was examined using discourse analysis and activity theory. The results were as follows: new knowledge was generated; and the training system became multilateral. This was achieved through a process of continu-ous context transformation: from past-oriented interviews to a context on the border between past-oriented and future-oriented activity, then to a context of making con-tradictions visible, and so on. In this process, a ‘nonsense proposal’by the researcher (facilitator), one that nurses had laughed at and denied, also emerged as a springboard for new, important knowledge. The discussion also describes what was created, and its associated or conflicted heterogeneous historicity. This is discussed from the viewpoint of concepts of zone of time perspectives (ZTP) and inter-historicity.