著者

外山 知徳 門内 輝行

出版者

一般社団法人 日本建築学会

雑誌

日本建築学会論文報告集 (ISSN:03871185)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.275, pp.119-129, 1979-01-30 (Released:2017-08-22)

被引用文献数

2

---

Design semiotics is a science whose object is design and whose language is semiotics. In this context semiotics serves to extract the essence of design. Modern semiotics, Charles S. Peirce's semiotics in particular, made the concept of sign universal. Peirce's semiotics is universally applicable because of its way to define a Sign. According to Peirce's definition of Sign, anything can be a Sign as long as it forms a Triadic Relation-i. e. as long as it stands for something (its Object) and creates a new Sign (its Interpretant). Such universality of Peirce's semiotics is of great advantage in the explanation of design, its processes and systems. For this reason we think that semiotics is well suited to extract a model of design thinking. We will find that the usefulness of semiotics to design science consists in its function to shedlight on the process of human thinking and to correlate the conceptual aspects of design. Fundamentally it can be said that Peirce's Triadic Relation of a Sign is a module of design thinking. The approach of design semiotics will be decided upon in detail by what is regarded as Sign. Any design phenomenon can be a Sign and can be described as a sign system and its transformation. The finding of Signs in design phenomena will represent method, logic and technique of design. A remarkable feature in the description of sign systems is the fact that a Sign mediates between man who conceives and acts and the object of his conceptions and actions. This feature constitutes a new science of design which takes into account the Triadic Relation of a Sign. Traditional design theories are all monadic, diadic, or quassi-triadic. Design information, which correlates between design activity and its object, develops into a Sign through its performance. This aspect is represented only in the Triadic Relation of a Sign. The Triadic Relation of a Sign is too general a theory to analyse design phenomena. Differentiation of designing is described in sign sequences-sequential description of Triadic Relation in semiosis. We can find in design phenomena various kinds of sign sequences : a sign sequence consists of, e. g., designing, production, and usage; thinking process of design objects; a sign sequence in the evaluation of alternative designs; function of design tools. A sign sequences adequately represents the fact that designing is generation and degeneration of a Sign. Studies of design semiotics are undertaken in order to extend the ability of science to describe and explain its objects. The necessity of these studies becomes obvious when they are applied to design activities. The present study has been accompanied by the development of an Information System for Design and by an examination of user participation work in a redevelopment project at the Kiba districtof Tokyo.

著者

馬居 政幸 外山 知徳 阿部 耕也 磯山 恭子 唐木 清志

出版者

静岡大学

雑誌

基盤研究(B)

巻号頁・発行日

2002

---

95年度から実施してきた調査を踏まえ、平成14年度から3年計画で次の3種の調査研究を実施した。1.日本文化開放政策進行に伴う韓国青少年の意識と行動の変化把握のためのソウル市、大田市、釜山市での継続・発展調査。2.日本理解・批判に関係する学習機会の青少年への影響と社会的文化的基盤解明のための新調査。3.日韓相互理解教育のためのプログラム開発とモデル授業実施。これらの調査結果の分析から、現代韓国青少年が日本と同様に個人化が進行する豊かな社会に育ち、社会的自立への課題を日本青少年と共有することを明らかにした。さらに、日本文化への接触状況と日本・日本人への評価の継続調査の総合分析から、漫画を中心に日本文化開放以前に浸透した日本文化が韓流文化の源流を形成し、文化開放の進行に伴いアニメや歌謡も類似の傾向が見られることを把握した。また日本・日本人観の変化の5類型を析出し、相互理解を阻む新たな意識構造を解明した。特に韓国中高生の「日本・日本人評価」と「推測する韓国・韓国人評価」の比較から、日本と同水準の生活を享受する青少年による既存世代と異なる韓国上位の意識形成を確認。これらとモデルプログラム実施結果との総合分析から相互理解教育促進への次の課題を解明した。1.インターネットを代表にIT化の進行が自国文化・言語内に閉じた意識と行動を強化するため、従来と異なる相互の理解(誤解・不信)に関わる多様な情報サイトの影響の実証研究と相互理解促進のための情報サイトの増設が必要である。2.両国の現代文化共有化は相互理解の基盤形成に寄与する反面、両国社会の問題点を認識させる側面もある。その克服は規制ではなく、より積極的かつ多面的な現代文化共有化の機会拡大が必要である。3.世代間格差を伴う新たな相互理解の障壁形成を克服するために、差異の相互認知に止まらず相互に修正をも要求しあうことで二国間を超えて共有すべきアジア的シチズンシップの構築とその教育システムが必要である。