- 著者
- 早島 理
- 出版者
- 竜谷大学真宗学会
- 雑誌
- 真宗学 (ISSN:02886480)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- no.129, pp.1-21, 2014-03
2 0 0 0 OA ラトナーカラシャーンティの菩行道 -Prajñaparamitopadesa における-
- 著者
- 早島 理
- 出版者
- JAPANESE ASSOCIATION OF INDIAN AND BUDDHIST STUDIES
- 雑誌
- 印度學佛教學研究 (ISSN:00194344)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.25, no.2, pp.944-941, 1977-03-31 (Released:2010-03-09)
- 著者
- 横尾 美智代 早島 理
- 出版者
- 日本医学哲学・倫理学会
- 雑誌
- 医学哲学 医学倫理 (ISSN:02896427)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.28, pp.83-92, 2010-09-24 (Released:2018-02-01)
The purpose of this research was to examine whether the bioethics of medical students changed after receiving medical science lectures. The same questionnaire survey was conducted in the 1st year, 4th year and 6th year for new medical students in 2002-2003, and their replies were analyzed. As a result, the same trends were seen in all 3 surveys as regards "progress in medicine," "progress in genetic research," and "the use of genetic diagnostic tools for intractable nervous diseases with no cure." On the other hand, as to the question "would you willingly donate a sample to genetic research if asked?" the number who gave a positive response increased with increasing years of study (P < 0.001). This suggests that although students' perception of their own problems did change, their perception of problems related to society as a whole stayed the same from the time of their admission as new students right up to sixth grader.
- 著者
- 横尾 美智代 早島 理
- 出版者
- 日本医学哲学・倫理学会
- 雑誌
- 医学哲学 医学倫理 (ISSN:02896427)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.25, pp.121-127, 2007-10-18 (Released:2018-02-01)
The purpose of this survey was to determine whether there are differences in the knowledge, opinions, and way of thinking about state-of-the-art health care and bioethics among students from different disciplines who attended bioethics-related classes in departments of medicine, Buddhist studies, social welfare, and dietetics. The survey was conducted with 303 students in 4 departments in 3 universities by a questionnaire completed by each person. Some differences were found among the disciplines in self-evaluation concerning knowledge of "bioethics" (p<0.01). On the other hand, there were no significant differences among the disciplines in opinions or ideas concerning bioethical topics such as "development of research" and "organ sale". Experience with study in the academic field or biology made a difference in students' self-evaluation concerning knowledge of bioethics, but did not affect answers to questions regarding opinions or ideas. This held true for a comparison between students (n=169) who took classes on bioethics and those who did not. It appeared that while self-evaluation regarding knowledge of bioethics was enhanced by study experience, opinions and ideas on bioethics were significantly correlated with study experience.